Running for CSM next year:

[Bjorn_Tyrson]

NOTHING!!! (also I accept bribes. Just sayin)

[Ima_Wreckyou]

I’m not sure if I can vote for someone who does not accept bribes. This feels kinda wrong

[Jonah_Gravenstein]

@Salvos_Rhoska

I have answered the questions I have deemed to be reasonable and ignored the rest because I dismissed them as trolling for daring to question my platform or because of their author.

FTFY.

[Wander_Prian]

It’s not if, it’s when. Your rule would do absolutely nothing to push forward your agenda. We all know how Eve works.

If you know the rule will be of zero use, why even suggest it?

I’d also like some proof of this corruption and political influence you are so afraid of. While having most of the CSM from null may not be the optimal choice, so far I’ve seen them tackle issues all over Eve, not just in null or for null.

[Salvos_Rhoska]

@Jonah_Gravenstein

@Salvos_Rhoska

I have answered the questions I have deemed to be reasonable and ignored the rest because I dismissed them as trolling for daring to question my platform or because of their author.

FTFY.

Quote editting is a forum violation.

[Jonah_Gravenstein]

Not to my knowledge, please point out the specific rule I have violated.

Also, irony.

[Salvos_Rhoska]

@Wander_Prian

Your rule would do absolutely nothing to push forward your agenda.

Then you have no reason to resist that change.

If you disagree with it, vote for someone else.

[Mintoko]

To some it will have appeared to work and then he would be praised. It’s smoke and mirrors. I mean, look…there’s only 1 goon on the CSM. It doesn’t matter that the other 6 left the alliance just before the elections.

[Mintoko]

@Salvos_Rhoska

Then you have no reason to resist that change.

Change for the sake of change? A waste of time.

[Wander_Prian]

Oh I am going to vote for someone else. It won’t stop me from asking you questions to show just how bad your ideas are though

[Salvos_Rhoska]

@Mintoko

there’s only 1 goon on the CSM

There are 3 GoonWaffe/GSF members on the CSM atm.
We dont know definitively which of the others are on the Goon payroll/influence list.

[Mintoko]

I wasn’t referencing the current CSM. It’s an example of what would happen if you got your way.

[Salvos_Rhoska]

@Mintoko

I wasn’t referencing the current CSM.

I am.

This is the situation at this time.

[Mintoko]

Your idea won’t affect the current CSM, nor the next. What we’re talking about is the future, after CSM14.

[Salvos_Rhoska]

@Mintoko

Your idea won’t affect the current CSM, nor the next. What we’re talking about is the future, after CSM14.

Correct.

[Mintoko]

I wasn’t asking for clarification. I know we’re talking about the future. My example was of that future. Your idea won’t do anything but hide the candidate’s true affiliation.

[Salvos_Rhoska]

@Mintoko

I wasn’t asking for clarification. I know we’re talking about the future. My example was of that future.

If CSM is not changed, that future may well have 6/10 GoonWaffe/GSF Corp/Alliance tagged seated CSM.

[Mintoko]

The result is the same if there’s a single Goon with several others who are goons with different corp/alliance tags.

[Salvos_Rhoska]

@Mintoko

The result is the same if there’s a single Goon with several others who are goons with different corp/alliance tags.

It is not the same.

[Mintoko]

It is the same. I’m sorry that you’re incapable of seeing that. There is no purpose to this.