You can try your potential apparel when you click on the items. It will show you the item on a grey mannequin. There’s a button at the bottom to switch to your live character. The item will then be shown in its original state and your character will still be dressed with whatever isn’t the item so you can see if color or style match your current outfit.
1 Like
I get what you mean.
It’s hard to tell how the game changed when you come back to it if you didn’t keep track of all the changes.
On the other hand this is easily solved by not pushing your limits immediately when you come back, but taking is low and building up from there while looking into recent changes as well.
I’m aware. In most games you can try on multiple items. Not just one at a time. Being able to look at one item at a time isn’t how it should be. We should be able to fit entire outfits, prosthetics, etc. all at once.
What incentive does CCP have to institute such a return policy on PLEX?
Am I missing something or is the mentioned ‘‘trying on outfits’’ the one that can be done in NES? Because that’s the only place in the game where I can try outfits – only the ones on sale in the NES store. I cannot try anything outside the NES, even if the apparel item was part of NES stock at one time.
And NES is very limited, practically useless, I would say. All the rare more valuable stuff, like Triglavian combat suits, ‘Field Marshal’ coat, even the not-so-rare black suit I have on – all the suits in fact, and countless other items – there is no way to try them on. You have to purchase the item first. Or is it different for Windows clients?
That’s what I thought they were talking about and simply mistyped “bottom” instead of “top”. If they mean viewing directly from the in-game market then I’m as lost as you are. And, yeah, the NES barely has anything.
They created SKINR to be a one-way money gouging scheme with no way to correct errors, recoup losses from mistakes, or reprocess them from mistakes or failure to sell… It’s all deliberate greedy BS… And isn’t funny that it’s missing a simple transaction history that should have been a no-brainer to include with it… Gee, did they deliberately omit a transaction history so there’s no record of it to avoid paying taxes on the tansactions??? It sure looks like it… Now watch their tools descend upon this comment to do damage control for what should be obvious to everyone…