My point was made by your unwillingness to answer those questions.
The name “Slave-1” didn’t appear in the script. I don’t believe it appeared in the novelization. I believe the first time it was actually used was (ironically) on a toy box. So, the first question was to bring up the point of how little canon supports that name.
The second question is about the name itself. If either Fett named the ship “Slave-1”, they would have a reason. But there is never a reason given for the name. Considering it’s a personal ship, you’d expect the owner of the ship to have a good reason for the name used. Ask anyone who owns a ship, most of them have good reasons for the name they give their ships. This question shows that the name of the ship is unimportant; changing it has literally no effect on the series.
The third question shows that while you complain of “idiocy”, “this mental illness to fester and poison our collective social dialog”, and making “a stink so huge even corporate ninnies in their board rooms will keel over coughing and gasping for air”, that you’re the one who is so easily offended and upset…
Most of us simply don’t care because it doesn’t change anything. It’s not like changing the name of an iconic and important ship like the Enterprise, Galactica, Serenity, or Millennium Falcon.
But you care about a barely canonized name that has no meaning… which begs the question: why do you care so much about the name “Slave-1”… no need to answer, I have my assumptions and more importantly: I don’t care.