But AG can’t exist without ganking 
So in reality you’re trying to murder 2 playstyles
Actually, this thread is a guide dedicated to AG
Interesting that you’re coming in, attempting to derail it
Do you have anything constructive to add my guy?
1 Like
It’s a thread dedicated to misrepresenting AG as a viable playstyle. It’s not.
Actually that is your opinion
The reality is quite different.
Why apparently NEPF itself is proof of concept.
Thankee for playing tho
Nope, it’s a fact.
So what meaningful impact does NEPF have on ganking?
Well you have no way of proving that really. So yes, it is an opinion
Huh. Its almost like you’re just trolling in this thread.
Strange innit?
One would almost think you’re attempting to murder two playstyles, not just one
Did NEPF not let you play either?
The fact that there has never been an AG group that made even the slightest dent in ganking is proof.
I’m making perfectly reasonable statements on the topic of this thread. You’re the one derailing it by trying to attack me for doing so.
You make me giggle
Why would AGers want ganking to end? That would end their playstyle silly.
I guess I am the last person who will play with you huh? Everyone else catching on to your shtick.
In reality bruv, there is nothing anyone can do to anyone that can force them to quit. Everyone makes that choice for themselves.
AGers need the gankers. Gankers don’t need the AGers.
You seem to be under the misunderstanding that AGers want gankers gone. In reality, gankers are their whole reason for being
1 Like
But but but without gankers, AGs could finally engage in all this sweet and super fun PVE and mining. Which they want to do, but cannot because gankers exists.
They don’t want to sit hours on Sivala gate whoring on CONCORD kills and accomplishing nothing. They want to actually play the game and do lvl 4 missions in blinged marauders and mine plagio in 0.5 in ORE stripper hulks. But because those stupid gankers they are unable to do so.
If I were AG, I’d want even more people to gank, because then more action.
AGers want to be able to actually make an impact to ganking, to offer an actual challenge. That’s currently impossible as ganking is so ludicrously overpowered in comparison to AG.
And Gith says they do
Are you calling a notable AGer a liar?
If he’s claiming that AG groups have an impact on gankers then yes, he’s a liar.
Ganking has many counters, why do players continuously deny this fact?
Inconvenient yes, but watch local, watch d-scan, watch intel, don’t autopilot, don’t AFK, use your contacts list etc… it’s frustratingly easy. I’ve been on both ends of the spectrum and I can confirm AG provides easy / low-risk content. Whilst ganking requires meticulous planning, co-ordination, optimals, timing etc. (to name a few variables).
2 Likes
Wow ROFL.
Also uh, Gith is a girl.
Chip truth omae
You are incorrect.
You are correct.
We made a very big dent in the large ganks in places like uedama, we stopped many ganks, we even stopped Kusion 3 times in a row one day, our burst attacks on gank fleets work great, we even had success in stopping moving gank fleets going after miners, until they realised how good we was at that, now they won’t come near us.
Like I said before gankers don’t want to die to us and will find away around it.
Now they mostly attack miner and missions with a rich pool of targets to pick, we can never be in the right place and if we are they move on.
Only thing we can do is blockade an area but that gets boring fast, which we sometime have done in the past with big mining fleets we know.
It really needs miners to work together more and ask us for some cover why they mine
According to Lucas, you’re just lying apparently
1 Like
Maybe he doesn’t have all the facts, Eve is a funny place, the other day I was 3 jumps from the pipe and chatting to locals and they had never heard of Safety or Aiko or AG
Lying or delusional. There’s clearly not been any dents in Uedama ganking.