So You Want To Be An AG? Here's A Starter Guide :D

The above is just your opinion to be clear. I have been involved in many successful saves with many of the techniques Gix suggested in his post.

Please stop derailing threads or start one of your own and post there

Uh huh.

So you’re saying she should stop taking in game action and simply cry to daddy CCP?

You caught on to what he’s doing huh?

:smiley:

I don’t think he can physically not post about ganking and how everyone else is completely wrong about almost everything. You could type “I took my dog for a walk today” and almost immediately get back an “Incorrect”. Of course, to hear him say it, he is hardly concerned about ganking.

1 Like

Very true. He also won’t share his secrets to keep the nubs safe.

Interesting :smiley:

I seriously doubt that. You’re either incredibly deluded or you’re a ganker shill.

In what universe is it derailing a thread to simply disagree with the OP? :rofl: :rofl: I guess “ganker shill” it is then.

I’m not a ganker shill.

If you think @Githany_Red is a ganker shill, you would have lost any credibility you still had, if you had any. Fortunately for you, after you deleted all the comments you made about gankers just being basement dwelling psychotic incels and then trying to act like you were the one being personally attacked all the time, that’s not something you have to worry about.

Calling Gith a ganker shill is just chef’s kiss LOL.

True. He’s kinda killed my theory with that tho haha.

Maybe if he’d follow my guide, he could save AG :frowning:

1 Like

Propaganda, morale boost

3 Likes

Yeeees! Really, why hasn’t she?! Crying to CCP is the way to achieve your dreams in EVE, nullsec blocs can tell.

@Githany_Red stop being so proud and and start crying and demanding CCP to nerf ganking.

1 Like

Now first I found out I’m someone’s AI alt gone rogue, now I’m a ganker shill.

Can I ask what’s a shill .

I was going to google it but I thought as I go on about Eve only works best with other players I will try and ask a human being, so enlighten me if you fit that roll.

(Sorry didn’t mean to ask just Aiko, it’s open to anyone )

He’s saying you support gankers basically :smiley:

As a play style I do

So many play styles do far greater damage than ganking

1 Like

Careful, in my very recent experience, bringing up past objectively-said comments will get all your posts flagged in a single thread as a targeted forum meta-game tactic.

3 Likes

Is the goal of anti-ganking really to end ganking? Surely it’s just an opposing playstyle that has emerged as a result of ganking?

AG succeeds if those people who are doing AG are having fun and finding satisfaction in doing it.

Talking about ganking in an AG thread is on topic. That only seems to happen when a certain forum member who shall not be named (but who rhymes with mucus) starts pulling threads off topic by making them about ganking.

I didn’t say it was to “end ganking” but it’s certainly to actually make a meaningful impact in ganking, that’s the whole idea of a counter playstyle.

It happens when gankers start criticising individual posters as the focus of their comments. The topic is ganking/anti-ganking, the topic is not about how outraged you guys get when someone disagrees with you.

Struggling with this sentence, perhaps adding some grammar might make it legible?

Nobody has disagreed with me and I didn’t get outraged, unsure how this links to my comment or the thread?

Missed a word. Fixed. By ignoring the first paragraph you kinda proved my point though.

Please clarify what point that was?

Here is the first paragraph in question where you clarify that you feel the goal of a counter play style is to make a meaningful impact in the playstyle it counters. I don’t agree with your opinion, I actually think it smacks of gate keeping, however it didn’t require further comment.

Thanks for making that legible. Well from what I’ve seen of the comments being flagged it’s all comments that look off topic not comments that look as though they break the forum community guidelines. Though I suppose that is open for interpretation and I could be interpreting that wrong.