I came across your comment Milenna, only because it was the last one posted when I revisited this thread for the first time since my own final post, solely to edit and slightly correct my statement about shifting to the marvelous and relaxing game X4: Foundations. That is the only reason I saw it. I was not reading comments after my last contribution, and I will not do so going forward.
However, this particular comment deserves a response, because it is both incorrectly framed and factually misrepresented.
You mentioned that you hold a PhD in clinical psychology. For the sake of clarity, I hold a PhD in applied mathematics - a field that is fundamentally grounded in logic, formal reasoning, and rigorous analytical intelligence. Without comparing disciplines competitively, it is nevertheless true that mathematics provides an exceptionally clear framework for understanding logical structures, causal relationships, and interaction dynamics in complex systems, including human interactions.
Every single question you answered with “No” reflects a biased, non-professional, and quasi-mediocre analysis. The core issue is methodological: the analysis was performed without properly examining the initial post. Instead, the questioner assumed the right to judge and analyze while bypassing the foundational text entirely. This is not analysis; it is projection.
More importantly, every one of those “No” answers is, in fact, directly attributable to later commenters - not to the original post itself. This is easily verifiable. Read the text carefully. Every word carries specific logical weight, intent, and meaning. When done properly, it becomes evident that the denials and negative attributions originate exclusively from subsequent commenters. In that sense, your analysis unintentionally (I sincerly hope so…) demonstrates precisely the lack of intelligence and rigor displayed by those commenters.
Do not confuse ironic replies or ironic outwitting that appeared later in the thread with legitimate foundations for psychological analysis. They are not equivalent. They are reactions, not premises.
Many commenters engaged solely to oppose something, without properly reading - let alone understanding - the original post. I responded respectfully to all reasonable comments and provided arguments where someone proposed something presented as a “solution” that objectively was not. When confronted with clear evidence, several commenters did not even attempt refutation. Instead, they remained silent and substituted personal opinion for fact. You know very well what psychology calls that - just as I do.
At this point, I will certainly not revisit this post, read additional comments, or respond further. I am replying now only out of collegial responsibility, to inform you where your judgment and analytical process failed, for the reasons outlined above.
Regarding what followed: as a matter of personal integrity, I was unwilling to delete the post. I would have done so only if corporate members had explicitly asked me to - which they did not. They left the decision to me, and even before that, I had decided not to erase it.
What happened instead was a permanent ban - within a timeframe of roughly 4–5 hours - starting from the moment I began extracting my belongings, all (lot of them…) of which were stored in corporate and alliance structures. From a psychological perspective, this behavior aligns with over-inflated egocentrism unsupported by substance, often resulting in fixation-driven egomania: removing someone not for misconduct, but for refusing to delete a post in which they fairly and respectfully defended their position.
History has a very clear name for censorship and social exclusion based on written word and expressed opinion… You know it. So do I.
By the way, all my assets are safe. None entered asset safety. And yes, I know you are happy for me in that regard. That outcome was achieved solely due to foresight, forward thinking/sensing, and - unsurprisingly - intelligence. Not an easy task under docking bans, access restrictions, and similar constraints.
In conclusion: intelligence combined with personal integrity outweighs almost anything else. A healthy adult existence is directly and unequivocally connected to both.
A sincere “o7” to all people of goodwill and intelligence who may read this.
Bye.
