Thank you for your replies, both of them. I did misunderstand your position, as the translation expressed it, on morality and security status.
However, this:
reminded me of a post written on these forums in 2019. It is still in my opinion the best explanation of why “high security” does not equal “safety” in EVE. So, I going to post a link here:
And for those that won’t click the link, the relevant paragraphs in Mr. Tyrson’s argument/explanation:
Lastly lets take the busiest night-club in the city, lets even say they are having some big special event. They probably have teams of bouncers, everyone going into the club is getting pat-down at the door, hell they may even have some actual cops on duty just to make sure everything goes smoothly. about as high security as you can possibly get at a social function, but also the greatest likelyhood that SOMETHING is gonna happen, probably at least a couple fights during the night, some phones are gonna get stolen, the bathroom is gonna have more drugs go through it than a pharmacy. So high security, but also the lowest safety out of these examples.
Point being, the highest security does not directly translate to the highest levels of safety. (Incidentally, thats also why null-sec is generally one of the safest places in eve, because even though its got the lowest “security” its the back-yard bbq style example, except you and all of your friends are packing world-shattering doomsday weapons)
That post and the paragraphs quoted were written by @Bjorn_Tyrson .
I still take my hat off to him for that piece of writing.
Jita is EVE’s “night-club”.
As Mr. Tyrson expressed, and you stated Jita (Zhita) is the most dangerous, despite it’s 0.9 status. Jita, EVE’s busiest system, reflects real life in this regard.
And, I have no problem with that, given that player piracy is a supported, and intended, game play.
While I do not share your opinion, I have a better understanding of your position.
Thank you.