But farming level 4 missions will remain intact and become 100% risk-free, so his game is fine.
Excellent idea. In fact, let’s take it a step farther: only level 1-2 missions (and mining of similar value) exist in highsec, and only T1 ships and modules of destroyer size and smaller can be built or sold in highsec. Now highsec has zero profit to go along with your demands for zero risk.
And?
Is this an argument for a pvp free high?
I would agree if i would get rid of gankers…
But i bet even THIS would be too much for the bittervets…
And yes…that means i’m so anti pvp that i would even would take this imposition if there would be no other way.
So… what exactly would you do in highsec at this point?
What point do you imagine highsec serving the game?
Because uh… Gankers aren’t having a significant impact on people running around in T1 fitted destroyers.
Nothing…
That comment alone means CCP will will never take him seriously and neither should anybody in eve from this point onwards.
Debating him is pointless.
Well yes, I don’t think it’s so much from this point onwards as years ago already.
But it’s still interesting to see responses to questions like that.
And about why they hate all the highsec players so much that they want to ruin all the highsec activities that much.
Sometimes I think Balos is a Goon alt making satirical posts intended to make highsec players look bad and convince CCP to ignore it or turn it into a noob zone just to feed null more people.
Oh jeez that is several layers of tinfoil. Stil… 
Ah yes…the complainers about a needed change,needed is a safe spot for pve only,bittervets that only want 2005 Eve,the last time ‘eve was great’…
The mere thought of changing this game to the better(away from the suicidal pvp favor) is blasphemic right?
There is nothing you can say to change whqat is needed for the game…
Nice spam and utter dodging of actually giving any answer of substance.
Dodging what?
Do i have to prechew you this answer?
What is so difficult about me saying ‘only mining and missions in high’?
What else would you do?
Expressive dance?
Don’t play as dump as you really are,nobody would believe this,totally unrealistic…
So, why do you feel it’s ok for you to totally ruin every other high sec play style just because you don’t like gankers.
Why do you feel it’s ok to make isk and thereby skew the market in perfect safety.
Why do you feel it’s ok to mine ore in perfect safety and therefore utter AFK gameplay and skew the market.
Why do you feel that players who can’t be interacted with in any way other than them negatively impacting everyone elses market experience are desirable.
Regarding the pve player loss the bubble you live in must be very cozy and warm…
No safe spot for pve = pve players leaving…really easy…
So, you don’t mind destroying the entire incursion community, the entire invasion community, all relic & data site runners, all combat sig runners, all anom runners…
You don’t imagine that entirely removing their gameplay might cause people to quit?
Dude that was not my idea…this was demanded from others,conditions suggested by THEM for a pvp free high.
I would let all as it is and just ban pvp from high…
You confuse cause and effect.
And no…i will not ‘prove’ it…just scroll up…
Even if it was not your idea initially, you have latched onto it to try and justify your case.
This makes it your responsibility to explain why you think it’s ok to destroy all those play styles just so you can have a space free for gankers.
Or alternatively, why the ability to make utterly risk free isk & minerals in significant quantities isn’t unbalancing for the game, especially when CCP themselves have stated destruction is a required component of the EVE economy and it isn’t happening in sufficient quantities right now.
Ah…
You mean as the person who is printing money in the printingworks is responsible for a bank robbery because said person prints money?
With that logic everything is possible right?
Cozy bubble you live in…
No…
It’s your responsibility because you literally said it. You have used it as a ‘See if we do this it will be balanced’ argument yourself.
That’s why it’s your responsibility.
Of course I’m not sure why I’d expect anything better than a total strawman dodge from you… well actually that’s exactly what I expected from you, but I hoped you might actually come up with something better. Guess not.
Because what you in your ignorance call ‘strawman dodge’ is in reality simply the truth you are not able or willing to see.
This is sad but not unexpected.
Bad PvE players leaving = more wealth and power for competent and ambitious PvE players… really easy…
this
…
wen i leave goons i go to low to live
my irl friend leave goons to at the same time
he is a pve player
now he does abyssal tier 5 and make a SHI$ LOAD OF ISK
eve never had so much high end pve
people complaining want free money
edit: he does more isk than i will ever dream of making , as always , because big pve guys earn a lot of money you know?
Well… not for capsuleers.
CONCORD is there to protect normals from the Space Gods.
–Space Goddess Gadget