Switch 4 for CSM 21 - Low-Sec, Faction Warfare, Pirate FW & the People Who Create the Fights

Hey everyone,

I’m Switch 4, and I’m running for CSM.

I ran previously during CSM 19 because I believed low-sec, Faction Warfare, solo pilots, small gangs, and smaller organizations needed a stronger voice.

A lot has happened since then.

We have seen substantial development in Faction Warfare, major changes to capitals and industry, continued iteration on Pirate FW, and meaningful attention given to problems that players in our communities had been raising for years.

A huge amount of credit for keeping those conversations moving belongs to the work done through those in CSM 19 and 20 who put an incredible amount of effort into representing Faction Warfare, low-sec, and small-to-mid-sized organizations through communities like the Low Sec Union and FW Parliament.

I don’t want that work to stop.

I’m not running to tear everything down and present a giant list of things FC has supposedly gotten wrong. A lot of good work has been done. I’m running because there is still work to do, new systems to evaluate, old systems to continue improving, and a community that deserves to keep its voice at the table.

My EVE Online Story

I have played EVE since 2007. In nearly twenty years, I have managed to find my way into just about every corner of this game at one point or another. I have done the high-sec carebear thing, I have lived in nullsec and experienced the insanity that comes with the massive blocs, I have mined, manufactured, run PvE, managed structures, dealt with logistics, FC’d fleets, and have dedicated more hours to this game than I would ever want to calculate.

I actively fly everything from frigates to supercapitals.

But through all of it, my heart and home has always been low-sec piracy. My PvP roots go back to the early days of Minmatar FW, where I became heavily involved as an FC and learned what made FW such a unique part of EVE.

It gave newer pilots somewhere to learn PvP, it gave experienced pilots constant fights, it gave small groups somewhere they could matter, and most importantly, it created the kind of unpredictable player-driven stories that have kept many of us playing this ridiculous game for far longer than we probably ever intended.

Today, I still live in Amamake. I am the CEO of Heretic Army, an alliance executive in SEDIT, and a lead FC and organizer for the public Angel Cartel community. That last part has given me a very different view of modern Faction Warfare. I went from the old Minmatar militia experience to helping lead players in one of EVE’s Pirate Factions. I’ve now watched FW evolve from what it originally was, through Uprising, through the introduction of Pirate FW, and into the system we are playing today.

I have seen great ideas work, and watched other systems completely miss the mark. I have seen nerfs that were desperately needed and others that probably went a little too far. And I have learned that very few problems in EVE are as simple as they first appear.

Outside of EVE, I have kids, work full time, and volunteer in public safety as a firefighter, EMT, and search and rescue diver. As Captain of our dive team, I have learned the importance of clear communication, level-headed decision making, accountability, and being willing to address difficult problems directly.

I am not afraid to stand behind what I believe, but I’m also not afraid to listen, have a constructive disagreement, or change my position when somebody brings better information to the table.

I think those qualities matter on the CSM.

My Areas of Expertise

My strongest areas are low-sec, Faction Warfare, Pirate Faction Warfare, unstructured PvP, fleet command, and the realities of operating small-to-mid-sized organizations.

I am not going to pretend to be an expert in everything EVE. Even after nearly twenty years, I’m still learning new things about this game every day. Where I have experience, I will bring it. Where I don’t, I will find and listen to the people who do.

Factional Warfare

FW is one of the areas I know best. I was involved in the early days of Minmatar FW, and today I see the system from the Pirate FW side through the Angel Cartel. Modern FW is dramatically different from what we had years ago. A lot of good work has already been done, but there is still plenty left to do.

With the new release, we FINALLY saw SOME iteration on Pirate FW, giving us shorter insurgencies, new sites, and a greater emphasis on winning instead of the constant cycle of draws.

BUT, I REALLY want to see Pirate FW continue developing into something communities can actually build around, with meaningful identity and purpose beyond LP farming and multiboxing.

Unstructured PvP

This is probably the part of EVE closest to my heart. Low-sec is at its best when players log in without knowing exactly what is going to happen.

A small gang roams through; someone gets caught, their friends show up, you escalate, they escalate, someone does something stupid, someone else does something even more stupid, and half an hour later there are capitals on grid and everybody involved has completely forgotten what started the fight. THIS is peak EVE for me.

Ships, Gameplay & HUD

I regularly fly everything from frigates through capitals and supers, and I want changes that give people more reasons to do the same. For me, good ship and gameplay changes should create more meaningful choices, more reasons to undock, and more opportunities to escalate without taking away the things that make different styles of combat fun.

The same applies to the HUD and UI.

I support improvements that make important information clearer and reduce unnecessary friction, but I do NOT want EVE to become overloaded with warnings, indicators, prompts, and constantly competing information. The new HUD that has been presented is a good example of where that balance matters. More information is not automatically better information.

The goal should be to make the interface clearer and more useful without burying players in visual noise or taking attention away from what is actually happening in space.

Industry & Markets

I am not a Jita market wizard. I dabble in personal industry and PI. My experience comes from running organizations that depend on industry: ships, structures, fuel, moons, PI, manufacturing, logistics, capital production, and replacement hulls. I want to continue seeing healthy markets and industrial systems that keep ships affordable enough to use, resources worth fighting over, and industry tied directly to content generation across New Eden.

Sovereignty & Logistics

My perspective is primarily from running smaller organizations rather than giant null blocs.

Structures, fuel, hauling, deployments, timers, capital movement, administration and leadership workload hit small and mid-sized groups very differently than they hit massive coalitions. Those organizations matter, and I want to better understand their perspectives and explore changes that account for the needs of groups of all sizes.

Having dealt extensively with nullsec force projection into our area of low-sec over the last six months, the new Ansi changes are particularly relevant to me. I’m eager to see how these restrictions affect smaller organizations, regional conflicts, fleet mobility, and the ability of large alliances to respond to fights far from home.

Highsec & New Players

High-sec is not my specialty, and I won’t pretend otherwise. But every part of EVE depends on new players sticking around. EVE does not need to become easy. It needs to become easier to understand.

Faction Warfare can be one of the best bridges from being a brand-new player to becoming an active PvPer. Sometimes all somebody needs is a cheap frigate, a fleet invite, and someone willing to answer questions.

EVE Online & Vanguard

My experience with Vanguard is more limited, so I would lean heavily on people who actively play both games. My basic view is that the connection should make players of each game care about what happens in the other without making either game feel mandatory to enjoy the other.

Why Am I Running?

Because the work isn’t finished.

Two years ago, I felt low-sec and FW needed stronger representation. Since then, we’ve seen what sustained community advocacy and CSM representation can accomplish, and I want to see that progress continue.

My experience in traditional FW, Pirate FW, low-sec piracy, and alliance leadership has given me my own perspective on the challenges facing our communities. I want to bring that experience to the CSM while continuing to learn from players across New Eden.

My campaign is primarily focused on:

  • Low-sec

  • Faction Warfare

  • Pirate Faction Warfare

  • Solo and small-gang PvP

  • Small-to-mid-sized organizations

  • Ships and escalation gameplay

But I also understand that none of those systems exist in isolation. Industry feeds PvP. PvP creates industrial demand. High-sec creates future low-sec, nullsec and wormhole pilots. Every part of EVE affects another.

I ultimately want to make sure the players in low-sec and FW continue to have a strong voice with FC, and that the progress made over the last several years keeps moving forward.

What Can Players Expect From Me?

You can expect me to be accessible. My DMs are open. I will listen to people outside my corporation, alliance, faction, and area of space. I will disagree with people sometimes, and I’ll explain why. I want to continue the community-focused approach that has worked well for low-sec advocacy: discussions, roundtables, talking directly with the people actually using these systems, and turning complaints into useful feedback.

I’m also not going to pretend I know something when I don’t. If I don’t know the answer, I’ll find somebody who does.

My Main Priorities - TL;DR

Continue Faction Warfare iteration
Keep building on the progress already made instead of letting FW stagnate.

Develop Pirate FW
Build on the insurgency changes and give Pirate factions stronger long-term identity, objectives, and reasons for communities to organize around them.

Keep low-sec dangerous
Support the mix of piracy, industry, structures, capitals, resources, FW, and independent groups that make low-sec unique.

Support solo, small-gang, and mid-scale PvP
Not every meaningful fight should require hundreds or thousands of players.

Keep ships worth undocking and losing
Affordability matters, but so do usefulness, counterplay, escalation, and reasons to risk expensive ships.

Support small and mid-sized organizations
Evaluate the impact of the new force-projection changes while continuing to examine the economic, logistical, and administrative challenges facing groups.

And the Truly Critical Issues

Some positions from my previous campaign remain non-negotiable:

  • More Police SKINs

  • Custom manufacturable fireworks

I remain prepared to die on these hills.


If you want to talk, disagree, complain, suggest something, or just shoot the ■■■■ about EVE, reach out. You don’t need to be blue, and you don’t even need to like me. If there’s a legitimate issue affecting your part of EVE, I want to hear it.

You’ll also be able to find me on various streams and interviews throughout the campaign, which I’ll keep updated below.

Heretic Discord
Angel Cartel Public Discord
Twitch

Fly dangerous,

Switch 4
CEO - Heretic Army
Alliance Executive - SEDIT
Angel Cartel FC
CSM Hopeful

10 Likes

I can’t think of anyone that has done more to hold up the Angel Cartel community since it emerged. Not just well deserved, but necessary for Switch to get in CSM and have a solid voice to represent the pirate factions in FW as well as FW and lowsec in general.

1 Like

Switch 4 has my full support as candidate for CSM.

I am hoping and asking people to set aside their differences and tribalism when it comes to wanting “their guy” in office. If you live in lowsec or have any interaction with the greater faction war mechanics, we need to unite as a single people to have our voice heard. Do not let CSM be filed with only nullsec bloc players.

Switch is as genuine as it gets and I truly believe that he will do his best to get favorable changes for us.

Thank you

1 Like

Switch 4, How would you bring proving grounds back? Proving grounds would be a source of destruction and content for those who don’t have the time to go about roaming or large fleet fights

1 Like

I preferred Switch 3.

1 Like

While I alone cant bring back proving grounds, it is a common ask that I hear from the player base and I would wholeheartedly support it as a CSM representative. I would absolutely push to have it return.

1 Like

He has a secret agenda to remove HighSec Ganking from the game. Just in case some miner wanna vote for him.

1 Like

SHHHHHH, that’s top secret.

Sir,

Thank you for your service IRL and for representing Insurgencies/FW in New Eden. This is an area I believe needs significant work so having a voice on the council to support improvements there is sorely needed.

As someone who finds third-party tools detrimental to the experience of playing EVE, I am always keen to see development of the information presented in the client, such as with map filters or shared bookmark folders, etc. As a CSM candidate, do you feel that the client needs more or better tools, and if so, what is one in-game utility you would push to create/improve/overhaul? If not, why not?

Hello. I would like to know how are you gonna fix Ieski’s smol pp behavior.

Now while I do support a lot of the 3rd party tools available. I DO wholeheartedly support more in game tools for information. The one downside to this is how complete they would be, how much work goes into reiteration and how it takes away from the larger goals at hand. I also don’t want to see more information overload than we already have. A lot of the tools and resources we have access to now are clunky or confusing imo.

With that said, the biggest fix/overhaul I would like to see is better access to corporations and alliances involved in specific areas of gameplay. Corporation ads to me are a bit clunky and generic. If a new player wants to join FW for instance, they should be directed to active groups within that faction selected. Those groups should be able to provide more in depth information for players to make decisions on.

I’m afraid there may be no fixing that. Too far gone.

1 Like

I have gotten to fly with Switch on multiple occasions, and trust that he will do what is needed to keep EVE fun and balanced in this CSM term.

1 Like

I have served along side Switch for years in both alliance leadership and as an advocate for small-gang pvp. His generosity to the Angel Cartel community, his tireless work ethic, willingness to listen and his deep understanding of faction warfare / lowsec systems make him an excellent candidate to represent the voice of lowsec. I wholeheartedly endorse Switch 4 for CSM.

1 Like

Switch 4 is obviously the best candidate running this year.

He has worked extensively with CCP on faction warfare and a variety of other topics, including insurgency changes and his involvement with the Lowsec Focus Group. His experience working directly on these issues, combined with his understanding of the lowsec and FW communities, gives him a strong foundation going into the CSM.

I’m genuinely excited to see what he can accomplish on the CSM and how he continues to grow in that role. I believe he has the character, skill set, and determination necessary to achieve his goal of becoming a first-time CSM member.

I hope he gets the opportunity to serve, and I fully and strongly endorse Switch 4 for CSM 21.

For the Feet!

Best of luck, my guy. I’m rooting for you! :slight_smile:

3 Likes

Switch 4 is a great dude and will be a great csm

Will do great things for the WZs

1 Like

Thanks oomfie! <3

1 Like

Switch4 is someone i can confidently say is a massive massive bellend.

Therefore he has my vote for CSM.

2 Likes

Switch 4 is a great leader, someone who really knows the ecosystem of FW LS well, and someone who genuinely wants to make the game a better place.

Small groups are the beating heart of low sec, and some of my favorite times in this game were when my former alliance Pirate Lords of War was beefing with other similar sized groups at the time such as Patchwork Freelancers, Cruisers Crew, No Forks Given, Strictly Unprofessional, and even Sedition. I believe that kind of dynamic political environment needs to return to low sec for creating more spontaneous fights and stories for people to tell years after.

I’ll Endorse and Vote for Switch 4 to make Low Sec a better place for smaller groups again!

1 Like

Do you have any thoughts on the problems FW faces with large multiboxing nullsec farming groups moving in and abusing faction mechanics to extract wealth from the warzones without contributing to their health?

As I understand it, this is a problem in both warzones and I would be curious if you had any thoughts or plans you would advocate for to FC on our behalf.