Then CONCORD must be added to low/null?
Wormhole Concord!
Then Concord could referee the Jetcan soccer matches.
negative we need pvp zones, highsec stays with concord tho
Iâm so upset right now
Merin
So like we said, you arenât looking for equality. You are looking for superiority.
If you call equality superiority, sure
How is it equal when you are saying Concord wonât be equal.
You have a very strange idea on things.
How is it equal when you are saying Concord wonât be equal.
You have a very strange idea on things.
Well for you anytime highsec is good things are totally unbalanced, so lol
Stop dodging the question: do you support genuine equality, or a game where you have special privileges?
Lol special privilegeâs, because your equality is dumb.
CCP really ought to just make a Ponyville server for all the PVE people to grind on, with zero contact with Tranquility.
The Infrastructure of Ponyville consists of mostly medieval village-style architecture.
medieval âresembling or likened to the Middle Ages, especially in being cruel, uncivilized, or primitive.â
I was mostly thinking of Fluttershy and Twilight Sparkle, but it is true that Pinkie Pie and Applejack would be badass PVPers.
Itâs called Sisi and already exists. They donât like it.
They donât like it because it keeps mirroring Tranquility. They need a server that they can permanently move their character to and grind their isk on.
More because itâs pointless grinding without the risk.
Yes, how dumb it is to suggest that âequalityâ means âeverything is equal, nobody gets special privilegesâ and not âhighsec gets special privileges over everyone else because Sabus Narian wants buffsâ. I canât understand how anyone could use the word âequalityâ in that wayâŚ
Bittervet who hates newbies angry that someone wants to help newbiesâŚâŚ.ok lol
Farmer trash still trying to deflect attention from its dishonest argument for âequalityâ that is nothing more than a demand for inequality in favor of farmer trash.
Also, newbies do not fly capital ships. Stop making this dishonest argument.