The Case for a 100% Safe Highsec

I never ask or encourage people to quit this game.

I do encourage them to be better citizens.

Maybe try ask why they reduced number of path in high sec and all freighters actually have only one way? It was change dedicated to killing flying freighters and making life easier for multiacounters gankers threw out hundreds of people who were engaged in trading and weren’t interested in shooting or thieving.

1 Like

That’s the goal, yes.

1 Like

Oh look another stupid thread from Chatgpt

3 Likes

So, if I used crayons, would you be able to understand it?


Yes indeed. Seems like Writing is bound to go the way of Spelling after Imagination and Grammar.
Oh well, good thing it’s only a forum.

I think you people want a Single player space game…

2 Likes

I think they want Cheat Codes :sweat_smile:

2 Likes

So, you’re very confused, but I’m supposed to take your advice seriously?

Got it!


giphy


This is a myth. New players are least likely to be ganked, and CCP’s own research showed that players who get killed are more likely to stay.

Also they have systems where it’s against the rules to gank them already.

Destruction is the engine that drives the EVE economy. If freighters never died in HiSec the stuff you build will be worth a lot less.

You need to show why this is a good thing instead of just saying it as if it is.

Ganking has already been nerfed a million times. If you can’t hang in HiSec in 2025 you just suck.

Anyway, HiSec PvP / griefing has been nerfed continuously over the last 12 years. The fact that you are still whining about PvP in a PvP game in 2025 is proof that no matter what CCP nerfs next, your ilk will never be happy and will always “compromise” the line further and further towards carebearism.

3 Likes

Right back at you.

Let’s see where ganking is in a year or two…

That doesn’t even make sense as a reply to what I said.

Let’s see where the game is in a year or two. Every time CCP caters to carebears, the playerbase shrinks. Enjoy your single player mining game.

1 Like

Yes, it does. You said my “ilk” will never be happy. So, I just said, neither will yours.

100% the opposite of reality.

But hey, you can say anything you like…

Except I’m not complaining. You are.

Demonstrably false.

I like how you added an ellipses for dramatic effect, as if it adds any validity to your childish ramblings.

2 Likes

What was the point of this picture?

1 Like

Make HS safe again.

Because Gankers Cry Harder When Their Targets Shoot Back.

It was never safe to begin with.

1 Like

In a very practical sense, it was 100% safe in the beginning.



Hard disagree, Ganking has only ever been nerfed, and CCP themselves always have said that space is dangerous. Remember these are people who live on a volcano and don’t physically stop people from going past warning signs. They believe that just telling us space is dangerous is all we need warning wise. Other players saying CCP is wrong in that HS is safe are the only ones saying that HS was ever safe to begin with.

5 Likes

Any facts to back up that statement? I would like to see them please.

2 Likes