This thread is hilarious! 
So… classic! This is going to get great! 
This thread is hilarious! 
So… classic! This is going to get great! 
So you just listed all the people who you feel agree with you, and share your views
and that is why they are more relevant
Than the other on topic replies which you ignored
because everyone who agrees with you is trash?
Now I see it clearly, it was wrong of myself and others to speak our minds, all we had to do was say what you wanted to hear!
That’s not a discussion though is it?
No adverse commentary intended towards anyone quoted, as many did add to the discussion, but most just seem to share a common ‘worldview’ if @Fabulous_Rod. And none disagreed outright, which is why they are included here I imagine.
Q1: What is your problem with people who do not agree with you, in general?
Q2. **How does quoting @Dinsdale_Pirannha further your point, that you went through and found 'the more relevant posts and question’s as opposed to the most self satisfying?
As his post, like all his posts, has nothing to do with your idea, and is about CCP being in league with/controlled by/consisting of (depending on mood) ‘the Null Sec cartels’.
Q3. Are you aware that my tone towards you, and the tone of others I am sure, is a result of the way you have behaved since you came on these forums, calling everyone trash, and yourself an elite PVPer?
What kind of response did you expect?
In one way I regret sinking to your level, but given you have behaved ‘like a Troll’ despite not being one, as it seems you actually did want to discuss something and not just make trouble and drama, I reserve the right to have treated you like one.
Thanks for reading that, Salvos.
Quickly then; in the same way that governments call tax increases ‘closing a loophole’ and ‘ensuring fairness and balance’, CCP avoids headlining changes which adversely affect our playstyle as ‘Nerf to Ganking!’.
There is a list somewhere, but I’ve been unable to turn it up. For now, you’ll have to believe me that it is quite a lengthy list (it goes back a bit) and I don’t believe ‘Nerf to Ganking’ appears on it at all. However, the effect of the changes was indeed as I’ve described.
It has to be said that we’ve also benefitted occasionally (the buff to destroyers, tags for sec), and I don’t discount that. However, the overall trend has been to draw a rope more and more tightly around our activities and to make Highsec non-consensual player combat increasingly challenging in an environment which is dominated (for everyone) by a humungous set of rules.
I’m not the one who spends all their time going around beating up on randoms and noobs who can’t fight back, and arguing incessantly on the forums because nobody can stand me IRL. The truth hurts sometimes, I understand.
Dude, that is LITERALLY what you are.
This is like the third thread or something you have made and you just keep posting the same stuff.
Also, Salvos: reasons are irrelevant. they do not change the end results, which fit the definition of “nerf”.
I’m not sure you’re trying to wordweasel around intentionally, but no matter the reason, the outcome is what matters. Otherwise we’d have a perfect comparison to real life and politicians, who just need to state proper “reasons” for justifying whatever horrible ■■■■ they decide. there’s always a group of (paid?) nutjobs who will defend the reasons, ignoring that in reality the reasons change nothing about the outcome.
Thanks.
I’m actually wet now…
EDIT:
@Fabulous_Rod I am confused by this exchange, genuinely, and wonder if you could clarify for me, what you mean?
A quick google-fu gives all the answers
Google-fu
You can do the research yourself, but here’s a few
-insurance denied
-hull resists added
-hyperdunking deadified
And many more…
and for every one of these changes, we had the same dumb people telling us to “adapt or die”. They are either too stupid to understand the inequity of the problems or they are benefiting from it and don’t care.
What do you mean, the same damn people telling ‘US’ to adapt or die?
These were presented as nerfs to suicide ganking, so whether we agree they are or not, it was unlikely anyone who hated suicide ganking (I assume that’s what ‘us’ means),
because regardless as to whether they are nerfs to suicide ganking in particular these changes can hardly be said to help them.
Do you know what hyperdunking is?
Or am I confused, and by US do you mean the suicide gankers, and you have been a CODE alt all along
SO CONFUZED
Why ?
Roddyboy is a great example of a totalitarian.
Why ?
Aridity is not conducive to the growing either of plants or of ideas. Patti is moist with intellectual fecundity. I think.
Something like that ![]()
I just think I have learnt LOADS AND LOADS about high sec ganking mechanics and whatnot from @Fabulous_Rod’s threads and the replies to his posts.
I have learnt a lot about the community and its unwritten rules from reading through his threads.
Was it even THIS THREAD in which universally renowned forum raconteur of tinfoil hattery @Dinsdale_Pirannha asked me if I was a CCP Dev/Null Sec Cartel leader’s alt? Golden.
So for pure entertainment value, and informative discussion, I give this thread an
A+
Unfortunately none of the good stuff has come from the OP, except the response he invokes in others, which is like sweet
honey fresh from the bee, full of vitamins and such, but sticky
THUS… I am moist
X
EDIT:
Roddyboy is a great example of a totalitarian.
Don’t you mean an elite totalitarian from UO and Darkfall or whatever the ■■■■ it’s called that he was banned from. This is the same guy right… they do blur together a bit I will admit.
Did Rod’s Forum PvP fleet just launch the most badly fit wall of text carrier?
Yes it was awesome.
MY WALL OF TEXT WAS FIT WITH THE FOLLOWING.
some people who agreed with me- who may or may not be alts but talk like a 12 year old like I do
some people I didn’t understand
some people who are agreeing with me at the moment but who I will call names as soon as they disagree with anything, was it @Anderson_Geten who got that treatment, I forget after 700 posts.
and @Dinsdale_Pirannha T2 ‘Tinfoil Rig of Bittervet’ for enhanced credibility
Yeah I was laughing so much at that rig.
Its the definition of anti-tank
Other trade hubs exists in Eve, just dump your stuff in a different station and stop passing through the Jita drain pipe, make the gankers work a little more. Instead you autopilot through space riddled with bored peeps sitting in stations waiting for a fat juicy whale to slow boat through system. Then cry when said peeps blow it up, i constantly wonder after all these years of this happening daily. Why people still feel the need for the game to change in regards to ganking?
Best Tank
@Dinsdale_Pirannha Tank
They don’t find out about any of this stuff until it happens, then
they come here and ask for the game to be turned into something else to suit them
They forget to look how many freighter get blown up and don’t have pilots crying like this in the forums
Its a new player thing you have to get used to dealing with real feelings of loss and rage and whatnot that don’t happen in other games,
That’s why I will always try to help someone get through it and come out the other side a player,
some people don’t want to play with us, they want to kick over the table and throw the pieces at the wall
‘Mommy its not fair they cheated’
But vast majority of people do get it of course.
LIKE THIS GUY IN MY FAVOURITE EVE VIDEO, WHO IS MY EVE HERO
@Fabulous_Rod what do you think about this, and the guy who made the video, and the guys/girls ganking him?
Genuinely interested in a response.
Looks like content to me.
BTW That is how you behave when you get ganked, once you have learned to play, that’s why this guy is my hero
Wow that’s the biggest quote tree I have seen yet!! Not gonna bother trying to reply to all that. Waste of time. I will say that you miss understand what I want. If you and your ganker buddies would have bothered to actually read what we are saying rather than hacking our posts into quote trees and leaving out key parts you might have seen that we dont want to see ganking done away with. I want it balanced. Risk vs reward.
I read your post, and stop it with the “selective quoting” Bravo Sierra, this new forum has 2 nice features.
Second you have completely failed to answer my question:
You have basically admitted you are doing something that is the height of imprudence. Why? And why should those seeking to take advantage of your imprudence face equally high risk?
I submit you nor @Fabulous_Rod can answer these questions.
Also there is this,
I want it balanced. Risk vs reward.
Again, if I take on lots of risk why should those seeking to take advantage of my high degree of risk taking also face a high degree of risk?
If anything, the fact that those taking advantage of others excessive risk taking in turn face low risk is itself game balancing. Risk in EVE Online is a function of your actions.
prime example. You really expect people to know everything about the game before they log in?
Of course not, but that is why having friends and people in game can help you. When I bought my first freighter I got advice from buddies in game on how to avoid such ganks. And even if that doesn’t work, well that is part of the game: learning by doing.
learning by dying.
Ftfy ![]()
Shut up anslo
RALPH! \O/