You want wars to stick to players. It’s only not necessary as it complicates the mechanic and the war dynamic.
When you want a second war with another corporation while you’re in a war then you’ll simply have to declare a new war. I’m sure you can handle this.
You have this odd thing where you take what someone says and turn it into what you think they say and then have a go at them for it. You do it all the time, there are numerous examples above, it is like you just want to attack people and twist and turn in any which way you can to do it.
Not so much dumb, extremely dishonest and sad, but please continue as you are rather bad at it.
I never said that? I have no idea where you have got that from, are you doing a Dom?
What’s this then:
Oof…
It is detailed above what it is all about.
As I said I never said:
How many times do I have to repeat that, there is an if in there you know, try to work it out please.
I don’t know. Perhaps try saying something different. Maybe that’ll make it stop.
You really want to push it don’t you, as I clearly laid out I never said what he said I said. Do you both work from the same play book, are you twins in your misconception and desire to misrepresent.
We just so happen to be right
And you’re mad we are.
Please refrain from projecting onto us lol
If they recreate a new corp. Many war deckers have criticised this mechanic and quite rightly too, this is all about game balance in terms of the other suggestions which are taken as negative by war deckers, this is removing what many see as a glaring hole in the mechanics and one I can understand.
I didn’t think you want wars to stick to players indefinitely, but you’re still trying to make them stick. You cannot argue this away or wish it wasn’t so, when it’s you who is saying it.
You are never right about anything, you think you are, and come out with this type of comment often, I find it a matter of insecurity on your part, that you must tell people that you are right, one of your issues.
Hahahahahahahahahaha, just pointing out your inconsistencies.
Talk about the pot calling the kettle black, you do it all the time, you misrepresent like no tomorrow, you are an extremely dishonest poster.
Sigh, well I will just accept that you have not managed to work out my intent and the actual mechanic. The war does not stick to them indefinitely, seriously mate where the hell did you work that out. You are acting Dom like.
@Whitehound what say you? 
I’m so dishonest most people agree with me 
That’s so very strange
P.s. keep it up with the personal attacks, it’s making you look so much superior
Appealing to like minded people, that is a win in your play book. Gold star for you…
Pointing out your methodology is what I am doing, there is a difference mate.
Anyway time for some Super ratting, toodle pip…
Uh huh
Sure
No personal attacks here,
I said, “I didn’t think you want wars to stick to players indefinitely” … are we talking the same language here?
You are raising something that is so obviously not the case as a question, I wonder why you even bothered doing that.
Wrong, see you missed the second part out, and with that little gem of misrepresentation of your own intent I am now getting my Super into warp. So that is it, fun is over guys!
I didn’t miss the second part. It clearly states that during the first week of a war a player will bring the war to a new corporation.
The war does stick to the player leaving the corp and follows the player to the new corp. It does get carried over, doesn’t it?
All I’m saying is that this is not needed. A corp who wants a war with a new corporation can decide to declare war, or not. By making it stick to a player is the decision in fact taken out of the CEO’s hands and placed into the hands of any leaving player. Does this sound right to you? Shouldn’t CEOs have the last say when it comes to deciding with whom they want to have a war?
I think I get what you are saying and it is something I missed, someone like PIRAT will set up a front corp, that will get a war dec and then that character will join PIRAT and move the war dec to PIRAT as an example. Yes I missed that. I would add the facility for the corp who is the aggressor to accept or reject a war dec on this basis. So if that was what you were trying to point out I am sorry that I missed it and sorry for lumping you in with Dom.
This is something that many smaller war deckers were annoyed about as they would spend the war dec fee and see the CEO disband the corp and then start a new corp, perhaps on the disbanding of the corp the war dec fee would be reimbursed on a pro-rata basis to the time within the war dec as a better option. Can you think of anything else that will help the smaller war deckers in this situation.
PS Installing a new driver for the graphics card so have a break.