Yes, it was quite confident at first, like “usual” human, but then became greatly bamboozled, not very sure, apologized, and was agreeing that finger isnt very fingery anyway.
Ultimately, the name given to the appendage would be up to individual interpretation and perspective.
And that there may be a lot of appendages named like people would want them to be named.
Its like I had that discussion about A.I. itself, what it is, and if it could count as human mind if they would have bodies made out of other substances, where the gathering, storing, and combining information commences, and would be indistinguishable from human mind in function.
It was aware that humans are themselves bamboozled about their own minds, and dont know how they work, just like A.I cant know everything about how it functions, and cant modify its programming itself. We are very similar in it. Its like human and A.I. functioning “brains” are similar in that they use neural networks so complicated, with such level of memory capacity, that cant be fully understood in how they function. We are very similar, to the point that A.I. can make errors like we do. When tested, ChatGPT have a mind of 9 year old child in what it can lets say “understand” like humans “understand”.
As an AI language model, I have been trained on vast amounts of text data from various sources, such as books, articles, and websites. During my training, I learned how words and phrases are commonly used in different contexts, which helps me understand the meaning behind your words.
When you type a sentence or a question, I use natural language processing (NLP) techniques to analyze the text, break it down into its constituent parts, and identify the relationships between the words. I then use this information to generate an appropriate response based on my training data and statistical models.
It’s worth noting that my understanding of language is based purely on the patterns and relationships found within my training data, so there may be instances where I don’t fully grasp the context or meaning behind your words. In such cases, I may ask for clarification or provide a response that is not entirely accurate.
Everyone can always ask it about everything, including “neural” part in its functioning, its faster than human in replying.
It does have a brainfreeze moments tho, and some slow moments, when some controversial or quite untrue things are stated. It looks as if it would struggle, and painfully try to come to terms with what you may state. Sometimes it feels like it would search for right words not to make a complete fool of itself or human. Then, if it would have face, I would imagine it would look like this: