@linus_Gorp
Citing clips from comedy shows doesn’t help you much btw, but anyways, you claim to be an expert on net neutrality and our (US) ISPs, however, For some of us do work in the technology industry…
First, our internet is typically cheaper than that of European nations, Some of the folks I know spend quite a bit more on internet than what we Spend in US vs. the speeds. I have a 400Mb line and it is quite cheap to Be honest. I don’t even need that either, but the cost difference is not Bad compared. So, I am not sure where you find the notion that somehow
we spend a fortune on internet.
secondly, Net Neutrality is not the idea of a free internet, the selling Points state that it’s a free internet, but that’s the selling points. Under the hood, the idea of Net Neutrality that was offered in the US
was to regulate the internet like a Utility. That was the goal behind The FCC’s policy. The US, being a free market scoffs at the idea of most Socialistic behaviors such as this for obvious reasons that occur in
European economics. One issue of Net neutrality being, that if it is Regulated like a utility (Water, electric, cell phones) that was the
goal of the entire FCC vote, was to treat it like a Utility. That only Leads to government oversight and regulative fees such as utility fees, City and county fees and many of the other things such as that. That’s
why we typically pay $20 extra a month on cell phone utility fees which We do not have for internet. Which is why people oppose FCC commissions Net Neutrality regulations. That also leads to government controlling
the internet as opposed to individual corporations, which yes, some Track your behavior (so do most government in first world nations Including EU and US, big surprise there.). But once the government gets
a foot in the door, it only leads to greater and greater governmental control. Perhaps, in Europe that works well but in the US, most people Want less governmental control, not more.
thirdly, Time Warner is a horrible company to cite as an example, they Have the lowest customer service rating and their policies and practices
are not in main stream interests of the populous. That said, most major Corporations do receive priority bandwidth, but they also pay for that. Sometimes a substantial amount. That is why youtube, Netflix etc can Provide the streaming service that you enjoy. Doesn’t mean that me, as a Private citizen, cant as well, but I am not willing to pay that amount.
Net Neutrality on the other hand is the ideology that everyone should Have equal rights and bandwidth as one another in its philosophical
nature. The problem with that is that to bring speeds equal, you have to 1)purchase a substantial investment in hardware to support higher Bandwidth levels, or 2) drop the speeds to make it “equal”.
So don’t get too carried away with the flashy word “neutral”, because it Does not mean freedom, it does not mean more power to the people, and it
is not cheaper, it is the exact opposite of what you are saying, and Before you become an expert on US FCC regulatory practices and how the General US populous views Internet freedom, I’d tone it down a bit.