Expecting the newbies to pay more than market price for structure and fuel, then locking them out from it, kicking people from Corp, and raising the tax to 100% isn’t you carrying them, it’s you blatantly exploiting them.
Also I love how you’ve presented zero.evidemce to defend any of the other points and instead are trying to appeal to emotion here, I even have you the opportunity to not dig yourself deeper by pretending it was other people’s fault…
Stop pretending like we dont know what you mean by “a specific demographic that is the one of the last bastion in the industry”
WE both know you intended the egotistical kids who desire complexity and pvp-related abuse. And we can confirm that with your resistance to change the game in any way that effects that specific player audience.
Please do not insult my intelligence or telepathic abilities like that. You are not fooling anyone.
Ok, Glad we agree eve does not need its long duration training, and stupid levels of complexity. (that was sarcasm btw).
In the end, my statement ends this debate. You are a minority, the flood gates are overfilling with people. Your opinions, your positions mean nothing as long as that 16,000 sits there waiting and wanting to play this game.
All of you, Literally every last one of you would be replaced in a month. That is how meaningless your positions are.
What? It takes 10 secs to enter Supercruise and if you are travelling insystem about as long to go from a to b as in EvE? Unless you are in a ludicrously large system like Alpha/Proxima. And going the .22 LY to Hutton is far far far from the norm.
In what way? These objects or their analogues all exist in Elite. While there are no Gates, there are Nav Points, Stations, Mining Sites, Conflict Zones, and Surface Sites. And everyone enters a system for the same place, the Primary Star.
Are you talking about EAB? (btw, this died because of EA not other reasons, it was on track to be the wow of its time).
It’s not the only MMO iv worked on. Iv also worked on two others, which are currently still active and populated (actually, they are well known).
And as usual he picks out one sentence without understanding or comprehending the rest of the article, which directly contradicts his own points. Oh well, can’t expect much from him really.
There are literally no games at all with 80-90% retention rates, unless you are picking the ‘retention between account creation and character creation’ period (meaning less than Day 1 retention).
Are you saying their success is because of your effort? Cause, your “Holier than thou” attitude, seems to suggest that maybe you think a smidgen too highly of yourself.
Yet again you fail to understand what a source is. A source is not you posting some graph which can’t even label both axes, has no clear title or context.
Its you providing a link to a peer reviewed or verifiable fact.
Also a source would match your claim of over 90%. Which your own evidence shows you lied about.
You have the evidence you need. Im not interested in your childish games after the evidence is presented where you say “oh its from so and so! it cant be valid”.
Light years a head of you, in the end your wrong.
Spend 10 minutes of your pathetic life pushing the google button, you will get your answers.