2 Likes
I like the cheesy version too.
Sweet dreams are made of cheese.
Who am I to diss a Brie?
I Cheddar the world and the Feta cheese.
Everybodyās looking for Stilton.
6 Likes
You still donāt get it. Thatās not how it works. Actually, this perfectly illustrates the kind of crap you do all the time.
If you want to claim something you said is sarcasm, then you have to at the very least be consistent about it throughout all your posts, but as Iāll show below, youāve failed to be consistent about it even in this very same post that Iām replying to.
Let me get this straight. Are you saying that you do believe what I said there was anything other than mocking you for claiming Iām a CODE alt?
For the context to be clear it has obviously to be clear for both the person that says it and the majority of the audience itās intended for.
What determines whether itās a joke, a lie, sarcasm, or what, is what the person that says it really meant. The context is what allows the audience to understand it and not take it at face value.
LOL. It was about you, so the context is everything you say in these threads, in particular you ranting in every thread about how imbalanced you think suicide ganking is and also you claiming anyone that disagrees with you must be a ganker alt.
Moreover, there even was another post at the beginning also mocking you for the very same reason, and hence providing even more context in the same direction that should have made it really easy for you to understand what I meant.
No, thatās what you keep pretending is the case, completely ignoring on purpose what Iām telling you is the actual reason, namely that you do things such as misrepresent what others said, make up stuff, and lie all the time.
Nope. And thatās a fundamental difference between you and me. What I do doesnāt guarantee Iām right, but it does guarantee I do my best to try to be right.
You donāt do what what I said I do at all. In particular you make up stuff that only exists in your head but that you need to fill the holes in your āreasoningā, while also dodging and ignoring everything that doesnāt fit your narrative. I never do any of those things.
And your rants about suicide ganking show that you havenāt done a bottom-up analysis there either. Itās very clear from everything you say about it that it just doesnāt āfeelā right to you, and you then try to justify that feeling with completely made up āobservationsā, systematically ignoring any other observations or data that contradict your claims.
I am arrogant, but I donāt do that. What I do is my best to properly analyse all the facts, without ignoring any and without making up any to fill holes up.
And I donāt call everyone that disagrees with me demented either. I do, however, call you out on having a need to make up stuff in order for things to make sense to you.
LOL. Yes, I made the joke about you being a CODE alt by just saying that at first. What Iām saying is that I also said that in the other post, in the same paragraph as the other thing that was sarcasm which I added to make the joke funnier, i.e. it was all part of the same mockery about you claiming Iām a CODE alt that you keep not gettingā¦ 
ROFLMAO. This is unbelievable and it perfectly illustrates everything Iām saying.
Man, weāve been there already. I asked you to provide any evidence of that and you didnāt. Youāre merely repeating the same nonsense again, completely ignoring all the evidence to the contrary simply because it doesnāt fit your narrative.
Again, I was not banned from AG for being a member of CODE. Nowhere may I have possibly claimed to be CODE, except maybe to make fun of someone like you or Dracvlad for claiming I was, but then it should have been obvious that was the case, LOL.
I shoot them and sometimes make their ganks fail if Iām not busy with some other ganker elsewhere. Even when I cooperated with them to gank ICANP, I would still hunt the very same gankers I was cooperating with if they tried to gank other targets elsewhere and I happened to be there.
This could be easily checked in a number of ways besides checking my KB, but thatās not really the issue. The issue here is that you believe this for the sole reason that you need to believe it, despite none of the things youāre claiming are evidence of it actually proving it at all. Youāre not interpreting correctly any of the things you claim are proof of me being a CODE alt, and that is what illustrates perfectly well some of the crap that you do.
But again, Iām not saying this to convince you of anything, so please, by all means keep believing what you need to believe and pretending itās me who is lying here. I love making fun of fools like you like thisā¦
BTW, didnāt you say everything I think youāre wrong or lying is sarcasm? How is that compatible with what you just wrote there?
Thatās correct. You only try to discredit me when whether Iām really an anti-ganker, and an effective one at that, might be relevant to the discussion. In all other cases you simply ignore what doesnāt fit your narrative for no reason at all.
I donāt think youāre able to fully appreciate it, but itās hilarious and ridiculous, indeed.
When you claim Iām abusive and insulting for merely disagreeing with me, despite all the evidence that itās always for some other reason, youāre coming to an entirely subjective conclusion based solely on your perception and made possible by your habit of ignoring the facts that donāt fit your narrative, yes.
No, we donāt just have two opinions that differ. We have very different methods to form those opinions. This very post Iām replying to shows you doing a lot of wrong things that I would have never done.
As an example (and this is just an example), at the beginning of your post you said everything I think youāre wrong or lying would be sarcasm, but then you fail to be consistent with that in the very same post you said it and instead pretend that me saying youāre lying about me not only doesnāt automatically make your claim sarcasm, but it does actually make me the one thatās lyingā¦
It might seem a minor detail that doesnāt really matter much because nobody was going to take seriously what you said anyway, but the key here is that you were using that claim to try to āproveā that I was lying about the sarcasm thing, i.e. you donāt mind claiming something to āproveā one thing and then do the contrary to claim another.
You do crap like this all the time. Youāre simply unable to realise or admit you do it because the only thing that matters to you is whether something fits your narrative at any given moment or not. You donāt care about being consistent in your āreasoningā, or about making up stuff to fill the holes, or whether youāre ignoring things that you shouldnāt, or about anything really, you just care whether whatever you come across at any given moment fits your narrative or not.
2 Likes
I was the one who announced the ban at the direction of Ast in the thread that you made on the subject of that hisec chat channel and your reaction to it. It was not because of membership of CODE, but because you were ganking alongside CODE. I will refer to you as CODE aligned in terms of your attitude, I really could not give a monkeyās if you are CODE or not, but you are no longer in the AG chat channel which works for me. 
The point is that I am backing up Lucas Kellās statement that it is impossible to win, and I am focussing on the excessive multi-boxing no life gankers, and we also got onto the fact that we cannot in the majority of cases save a target, and that loot denial is the only approach that works.
Being on station waiting for a ganker to be active is difficult especially for hisec players that still have to grind, unless they are playing the market like Tipa.
1 Like
So is there a new channel for people who want to take it seriously?
You are welcome to go there and be abused. 
Why would I go there?
I, like you, have no wish to actually change the current status quo
They have to grind? Says who?
No, it is not. You literally donāt have to do anything. It only costs time.
2 Likes
Time is free, OK. I wonder if any of the forum watch dogs will jump on you for that blooper?
My god do you have a reading impediment?. It is not a blooper. I do not say time is free. I say waiting which only costs time is not difficult. Waiting in a station on a ganker is time consuming, yes. Is it difficult, no.
3 Likes
I made my point, this is a cost in time opportunity for hisec players, and you blithely stated that it only costs time which seemed to indicate that you think that time is free as you were acting as if it did not matter. Hence my suggestion that you did a time is free post. It is pretty clear that this was to make a point that you were erring on the side of that type of thinking.
Uhm no. But knowing you want the final word anyway. Iāll leave it to you. Everybody else can judge for themselves why your statement is ridiculous.
Not bothered about that at all, but it is pretty evident that you think that the time opportunity cost for AG is meaningless and think that there is no issue for them to sit around waiting for gankers. I just made it clear that this is wishful thinking on your part, because AG donāt get much income from this, though the loot scoopers do, if they keep it, some give it back to the original victim.
Codes view on your efforts.
3 Likes
That looks like CODE players in a circle jerk ranting and raving over new players getting on kills with CONCORD. Seems a little forced and false to me
I donāt think there is any other public channel for AG. I have my own private channel that people I trust may join, and there is also the option to join the guys that created this thread, which have the right attitude from what Iāve seen so far. Donāt know whether they have a public channel, I guess they just use the existing AG channels for that, but they do have a recruitment thread here:
3 Likes
They looks pretty good, I hope they develop well.
1 Like
Weāre behind ya
1 Like
Looks like James315 congratulating Knowledgeminer for his efforts.
Youāre missing the point and actually fell victim of your own device there.
Of course you were being sarcastic, but the point is that for you to be sarcastic there, you had to mean the opposite of what you said. That is where consistency matters and what youāre missing.
If you want to claim you were being sarcastic there, which Iām sure is the case, then you cannot use that to āproveā this:
So in admitting that was sarcasm, which we all already knew it was, you also admitted yourself that what you said there is plain false, i.e. you cannot claim anything you said was sarcasm and get a free passā¦
You donāt understand. For you to claim you used irony to convey sarcasm, you need to claim you meant something else than what you said. Itās in pretending that you meant something else that you need to be consistent. You cannot claim something was sarcasm in one place and then clearly show you did actually mean what you said in anotherā¦
Not sure why you would need this to be explained but here it goes:
I was clearly mocking you for claiming Iām CODE alt by claiming the same about you. You pretend that mockery was a lie, which would indicate you do believe I did actually mean what I said, which is what I was asking for confirmation, i.e. do you believe I did really mean youāre a CODE alt when I said that or what?
Because if youāre aware I was merely mocking you, then you cannot claim it was a lie, whereas if youāre taking what I said at face value then yes, you could make a fool of yourself and claim it was a lieā¦
If the claim is honest (too much to ask from you, I know), then yes, of course. In principle, youāre the only one that knows what you meant, and hence whether what something you said was sarcasm or notā¦
But the fact that you talk about this as if you thought it could be a problem in practice or something, is very telling. Youāre completely missing how consistency matters here. The key is that you cannot claim something you said was sarcasm and then behave in a way that clearly indicates you did actually mean what you saidā¦
ROFL. Too bad youāre not the only that witnesses what you do on these forums, eh?
And you ask this while discussing one of the things you make up all the time, which is claiming people that you know nothing about are ganker alts for the sole reason that they disagree with your views on suicide gankingā¦
No, because you make them with nothing to substantiate them other than your beliefs.
The case of you claiming other participants must be ganker alts being a good example, but the other thread about suicide ganking has more, and when proven wrong you simply dodge the issue so you may keep believing whatever you want to believeā¦
Sorry, but merely stating this or that is a lie, to try to make it look like I make the same kind of gratuitous claims about you or Dracvlad, doesnāt work. You need to also show why itās a lie, like Iām doing every time I claim that. I never do merely state something is a lie.
So please feel free to point out where have I made up anything or ignored any fact that was relevant, which is what I said I donāt do and youāre claiming is a lie. I hope you have something better than me saying youāre a CODE alt, LOL.
Sorry, but not doing the work for you, so you may keep making a fool of yourself, is part of the funā¦ 
As I said, I donāt want to convince you that Iām not a CODE alt. Actually, I want you to keep believing I am. At this point Iām only interested in showing how you have absolutely nothing to substantiate your claim, because it perfectly illustrates some of the crap that you do all the timeā¦
So what? It is a fact that I was not banned for being a member of CODE. Are you using some gossip in AG channel from people that had no clue as āproofā now?
BTW, itās funny that you keep bringing up my ban from AG channels as āproofā because the people that banned me do know Iām not a CODE alt, but Iāll leave it at that, LOL.
ROFLMAO. This is gold. Iām gonna bookmark this for posterity.
There are other things that may be more difficult to figure for someone thatās not in the know, but this is really easy. And still you prefer to keep making a fool of yourself by dismissing it and claiming I was lying thereā¦
Cāmon, even Dracvlad could help you there, but heās simply letting you make a fool of yourself insteadā¦
Yes, Iāve cooperated with them to gank pilots that were a common target for us. And I also cooperate with them to gank actual bots (not mere ābot aspirantsā). So what? How does that make me a CODE alt?
LOL. Of course there is, and itās very easy to check by just you giving an example of me doing what youāre claiming I do, to which I may then reply showing why I did that in that case, how it isnāt related to the difference in opinions at all, and how the actual reason was there for everybody to see but you simply chose to ignore itā¦
Yes, but that wasnāt the point. The point is that you were not being consistent about it because you used that to try to āproveā some other claim that, if it was sarcasm (which it was), then cannot be āprovenā that wayā¦