The donation of an entirely different example of a Corrupted Trinary Relic (as confirmed by quantum signature analysis and comparison with other evidence in this case) is appreciated but will not figure in the resolution of outstanding matters in this case.
It was wise to configure the contract as a donation as this avoided the question of attempted fraud in commission of substitution of evidence.
Next time the researchers take their measurements, would someone with all of their marbles please slavage any wreckgage that results? This drama is getting silly.
That said, it’s nice to have an official statement agreeing that each individual Corrupt Trinary Relic is its own distinct entity, not identical to others~
Yes, when interfering with a criminal investigation, it’s certainly ‘admirable’ to be so stupid as to publicly try to extort CONCORD and threaten tampering with the evidence, and then go and actively tamper with that evidence and make a public statement to let people know you’re up to something.
“Admirable”. That’s totally what it is. Not “Idiotic”, not “stupid as hell”, not “rampantly mind-bogglingly foolish unforced self-inflicted injuries”…
And oh, where’s the sarcasm tags so I can put them around all that… holy carp you might be dumber than she is.
When CONCORD officials such as @Oveg_Drust take more than a day to respond to private correspondence even from a person of interest, then, making a public statement in which e.g. @Oveg_Drust is tagged is the only way to get officials like @Oveg_Drust to reply in a timely manner.
In any case, my thanks, Ms. Valate, for the documents. However, given that ARC personnel were not able to personally study the material in question, and given that you’ve demonstrated a willingness to deceive others, we’ll have to operate on the assumption that any documentation is incomplete or possibly deceptive.
This, I think, concludes our interest in this particular matter.
It was in no way attempted fraud, which I can prove quite easily.
The assigned contract, consisted of a standard cargo container, labelled “Spring-loaded box of Jovian Memes”
The contract description, filled out by myself stated quite clearly “Does exactly what it says on the tin”
At no point, did I claim in the contract that it was the object requested.
Behold the proof:
So, your baseless assertion that it was “attempted fraud”, is yet another example of the lax standards of professionalism to which CONCORD have fallen.
Woe.
This will go into the file of accusations that my lawyer is filing with the Tribunal.
Please. The clear implications of your post here are that you’re surrendering the specific Trinary they’re interested in. You attempted to pass off a different Trinary as that one. That’s fraud.
For someone who makes claims of being an accomplished academic, you consistently insist on demonstrating, again and again, that you’re dumber than a whole box of rocks. You should probably quit while you’re behind.
Rather she is an uptight bore than yet another sanisabik assclown of which we already have overabundance of. Does bloodgodism cause this behavior or is it a prerequisite to become one? Now there’s something to about.