The donation of an entirely different example of a Corrupted Trinary Relic (as confirmed by quantum signature analysis and comparison with other evidence in this case) is appreciated but will not figure in the resolution of outstanding matters in this case.
It was wise to configure the contract as a donation as this avoided the question of attempted fraud in commission of substitution of evidence.
Next time the researchers take their measurements, would someone with all of their marbles please slavage any wreckgage that results? This drama is getting silly.
That said, itâs nice to have an official statement agreeing that each individual Corrupt Trinary Relic is its own distinct entity, not identical to others~
Yes, when interfering with a criminal investigation, itâs certainly âadmirableâ to be so stupid as to publicly try to extort CONCORD and threaten tampering with the evidence, and then go and actively tamper with that evidence and make a public statement to let people know youâre up to something.
âAdmirableâ. Thatâs totally what it is. Not âIdioticâ, not âstupid as hellâ, not ârampantly mind-bogglingly foolish unforced self-inflicted injuriesââŚ
And oh, whereâs the sarcasm tags so I can put them around all that⌠holy carp you might be dumber than she is.
When CONCORD officials such as @Oveg_Drust take more than a day to respond to private correspondence even from a person of interest, then, making a public statement in which e.g. @Oveg_Drust is tagged is the only way to get officials like @Oveg_Drust to reply in a timely manner.
In any case, my thanks, Ms. Valate, for the documents. However, given that ARC personnel were not able to personally study the material in question, and given that youâve demonstrated a willingness to deceive others, weâll have to operate on the assumption that any documentation is incomplete or possibly deceptive.
This, I think, concludes our interest in this particular matter.
It was in no way attempted fraud, which I can prove quite easily.
The assigned contract, consisted of a standard cargo container, labelled âSpring-loaded box of Jovian Memesâ
The contract description, filled out by myself stated quite clearly âDoes exactly what it says on the tinâ
At no point, did I claim in the contract that it was the object requested.
Behold the proof:
So, your baseless assertion that it was âattempted fraudâ, is yet another example of the lax standards of professionalism to which CONCORD have fallen.
Woe.
This will go into the file of accusations that my lawyer is filing with the Tribunal.
Please. The clear implications of your post here are that youâre surrendering the specific Trinary theyâre interested in. You attempted to pass off a different Trinary as that one. Thatâs fraud.
For someone who makes claims of being an accomplished academic, you consistently insist on demonstrating, again and again, that youâre dumber than a whole box of rocks. You should probably quit while youâre behind.
Rather she is an uptight bore than yet another sanisabik assclown of which we already have overabundance of. Does bloodgodism cause this behavior or is it a prerequisite to become one? Now thereâs something to about.