don’t force me to stay awake… give me a reason to stay awake
Funny, my money making scheme hasn’t been affected at all, and here I am. Because its a short sighted change.
How much faster are you clearing a site not AFK by manually targetting them vs just… letting them continue aggroing everything as soon as they’re done? Do you honestly believe you can clear a combat anomaly in 2 minutes by manually targeting, but for some reason it takes 15 minutes if you’r AFK?
What good would that do?
“oh, let’s just add in random things!”
You could spawn a True Sansha Supercarrier rat in every single site and that’d be “random”. Doesn’t mean it’s a good change.
No one is forcing you. If you need to sleep go to bed.
1 Like
im speaking in the 3rd person i don’t afk site never have
Boo hoo. Players who use missiles and guns are able to do PvE without having the game play itself for them, drone users can figure out how to lock targets and activate weapons.
Then what’s your complain? Something you’re not doing?
tbh i don’t think you have ever done a combat site if you know how to do it / what weapons to use you can do anything
How exactly is a damped down/ ecm’d by rats player “low attention gameplay”. The only low attention gameplay done with drones is null sec anom ratting.
Unless you know of another. Which you don’t.
It’s like in real life, people are so ideological and emotional they don’t think things through. They simply think “this will hurt people I don’t like so it’s good” and go from there.
Problem is, it’s not going to hurt people you don’t like, it’s going to screw totally innocent players who are at the keyboard, paying attention, and simply got ewar’d by rats.
Meanwhile, the people who were doing the low attention stuff will just find yet another way to not pay attention. Fof missles require 1 button push every 5 minutes. Smartbombs don’t even require that much.
Upcoming Changes to Docking System
??? : Hello Capsuleers,
In December, we will be modifying the ‘Docking System’ to be manually controlled, By increasing the risk of completing the actual docking, you will create more PVP situations than before.
From now on, the docking system, like the system of’Elite Dangerous’, requires more careful player control.
We recognize the importance of player-to-player battles, and we wanted to make this situation more active.
And this is the first step.
In the future, we plan to increase the operability of the warp system and combat system to make the PVP situation more active.
Fly safe o7
Note: Will my dream come true? I think there is a possibility. 
3 Likes
At least you can admit it.
Anyone can say “I want engaging PvE”.
The problem is what exactly is “engaging PvE”.
I’m asking you for examples, but you’re just getting defensive about it as if I’ve attacked you personally.
lol 10/10 comment
1 Like
How exactly is launching drones and just moving around a little bit not?
Oh well? Adapt or die, it’s how EVE Online’s always been.
Okay?
Go talk to CCP about it and they’ll probably swing the nerf hammer on those too.
you tell me
Why does this matter, people will complain over any change.
I’m not complaining because its a change, I’m well positioned to completely ignore it with minor changes to what I do. Hell, i’m going to gain from it, the fair-weather ratters will be gone, meaning fewer escalations, meaning better deadspace loot prices for me down the road.
I’m saying that the thought process is stupid, and it’s a rehash of the kind of bad thinking ccp has displayed in the past. I think that more of you would see that if you could step out of your bias for a second. It’s like the ESS thing, it doesn’t seem to be accomplishing what people thought it would, it’s all just “run away” 100mn stabbers failing to steal anything and fewer folks ratting (at least where I’m at).
We don’t get good game design because some of you wouldn’t know what that is if it bit you straight in the…Afterbuner…
1 Like
You’re the one who proposed it so…?
Unless you’re just one of those kids who says “make PvE engaging,” but when asked “how”, they just obfuscate and dodge the question. Which you’re doing right now.
Edit: You are one of those, got it, okay.
i just wanted to see what some1 that has never done pve would say, plus i allready gave you two ideas on how to fix it if you could read
right here there is two good ideas
And then people will figure out another way. Why is the idea that CCP should be developing fun pve (which works) rather than trying to nerf their way to a healthy economy (which has never worked) such a controversial idea for you?
As in real life, history repeats because people don’t pay attention. CCP nerfed incursions in 2011 for the same reasons only to quietly unnerf them later (rather than find creative ways to make them balanced). Same with anoms in 2011, and other forms of PVE since then.
And like lemmings, unknowledgeable players like you cheer. And when someone tries to explain why you aren’t getting it, you post over and over and over again with stupid stuff.
I don’t get it, can people not be smart for the 5 seconds it would take to understand the issues?
preach it