Remember the Anthrax scare during 9.11.01? SARS-CoV-2 is much more deadlier.
A comparison between Inhalation Anthrax and Inhalation SARS-CoV-2.
SARS-CoV-2 is much more deadlier and nastier than Inhalation Anthrax.
Both SARS-CoV-2 and Inhalation Anthrax come from similar places. SARS-CoV-2 comes from wet markets where cooked or uncooked raw meat and live animals are bought and sold. Inhalation Anthrax can be found in slaughterhouses or contaminated animal products and infected animals.
Infection for inhalation Anthrax usually occurs within a week after exposure but can take up to two months. SARS-CoV-2 can infect a person in as little as two days and up to 14 days.
Without treatment a person will die from the Covid-19 disease, compared to only 10-15% who die from untreated Inhalation Anthrax. The survival rate of those exposed to Inhalation Anthrax is 55% with aggressive treatment compared to an 88% percent chance of survival using aggressive treatment for Covid-19.
Anthrax IS NOT contagious, SARS-CoV-2 however, is highly contagious.
Weaponized Anthrax and SARS-CoV-2 both have the ability to be transmitted from animal to human. SARS-CoV-2 can be transmitted from animal to human then to animals.
Both viruses come from Asian based countries but unlike Anthrax that is rare in Western and civilized nations, such as the U.S,. due to strict health standards, SARS-CoV-2 is a prominent contagion in the U.S. and the rest of the world.
Anthrax causes skin, lung and bowel diseases. SARS-CoV-2 causes not only respiratory damage, the SARS-CoV-2 virus also attacks the kidneys and other organs and has been discovered to cause Kawasaki Disease in children.
Anthrax is transmitted directly between the animal and human without the infected human transmitting Anthrax to another person. SARS-CoV-2 can infect a person or animal directly or indirectly.
Weaponized SARS-CoV-2 is much more deadly than Weaponized Anthrax. Weaponized SARS-CoV-2 on a plastic piece of tape or left behind on a surface where SARS-CoV-2 can infected up to ten people touching the letter or surface then causes the virus to spread to twenty and thirty people compared to Weaponized Anthrax only infecting those who come in direct contact with the Anthrax spores.
Anthrax can live for decades in the soil unlike the SARS-CoV-2 virus that deactivates after several days out side of the human or animals body. Unlike Anthrax though that only effects those coming into direct contact with Anthrax, SARS-CoV-2 will remain activate indefinitely as long the virus is transmitted from human to human, from human to animal, from human or animal to a surface and from a surface to a human or an animal. In this case the âsoilâ for SARS-CoV-2 to remain active indefinitely is a human being, dog or cat.
SARS-CoV-2 has been discovered in the semen of men who have recovered from a Covid-19 infection. SARS-CoV-2 has also been found in the stool of infected people.
SARS-CoV-2 is a very nasty virus, much more so than Anthrax is. Based on SARS-CoV-2âs infection rate being 100% of people who come into direct or indirect contact with the virus, the speed in which SARS-CoV-2 becomes active and infects other people that is faster than Anthrax, the secondary infections that are caused by SARS-CoV-2 in children that are not present in Anthrax and the many factors associated with SARS-CoV-2 and Covid-19, the pandemic is a Biomedical Level 4 Pandemic.
Biomedical Level 4 because the SARS-CoV-2 is exponentially dangerous and does create extreme levels of life-threatening diseases, secondary diseases and death.
In a Biomedical Level Four environment the safety equipment that must be used are positive-pressure, air-supplied full-body suit + decimation stations.
Unless a corporation has the ability to full protect the employee using BSL Level 4 PPE to contain the virus from spreading, then the corporation is not maintaining a safe environment or work place policy to keep the SARS-CoV-2 virus from spreading.
If everyone in the U.S. has a BSL Level 4 Environment Suit and wears it to work and in the public for one month, the number of new infections will drop dramatically, but without a vaccine to inactivate the virus upon entry into the human body, the BSL Level 4 suit will need to be worn indefinitely.
Anthrax however is a Biological weapon, and can also decimate crops and kill more people.
COVID-19: Over a million likely to be evacuated due to Cyclone Amphan
India and Bangladesh officials are bracing for Cyclone Amphan, which looks likely to intensify and is on course to hit two Indian states on the east coast. The state of Odisha is preparing to evacuate over a million people amid the nationwide COVID-19 lockdown.
Anthrax is also illegal if not used in case of violation of military law.
There are treaties against use of chemical and biological weapons.
Their storage are highly regulated, and nobody without clearance, or, rather, authority, from security, is authorized to even put risk to it.
In other words, itâs not about clearance, itâs about treaties.
Anthrax is a serious infectious disease caused by gram-positive, rod-shaped bacteria known as Bacillus anthracis. Anthrax can be found naturally in soil and commonly affects domestic and wild animals around the world.
However, Anthrax has antidotes, which, the US had, during the 9-11.
COVID-19 has no remedies to prevent the damage (yet).
Whoever has it, if any, is secret.
The first research can be the most costly.
It depends on the buyer / seller and offer and demand.
The worldâs most dangerous bioweapons
Marburg virus can be easily isolated and created as a biological weapon . âŠ
The Hanta virus from Bunyaviridae family of viruses has a mortality rate of up to 50%. âŠ
Anthrax is one of the most potential biological weapons in the world.
Letâs say your research is lucky and yields result on first try, you have the lowest costs.
Letâs say your research is unlucky and yields the worst results, or, is interfered and , yields the worst results.
The costs are going to be the highest.
The Problem of Chemical and Biological Warfare : A Study of The Historical, Technical, Military, ⊠Reptiles and Insect Venoms, Food Ingredients, Clothing and Environmental Toxins. ⊠Medical NBC Battlebook, USACHPPM Tech Guide 244.
As used herein, biological weapons , agents, operations, fillers, etc., are only addressed in ⊠They may be referred to as improvised chemical devices (ICD) or highâ tech IED (HTIED) ⊠Operate in a nuclear, biological , or chemical environment .
It is a common mistake in going to war , to begin at the wrong end to act first, ⊠nuclear aircraft carriers, high- tech nuclear submarines, tanks that can engage in ⊠suits for our troops that can protect them in a biological / chemical environment .
Environmental warfare is "defined as (1) the intentional modification of a system of the natural ecology, such climate and weather, earth systems such as the ionosphere, magnetosphere, tectonic plate system, and/or the triggering of seismic events (earthquakes) (2) to cause intentional physical, economic, and psycho- âŠ
than natural Anthrax yes, not Anthrax as a biological weapon.
But again, Iâm not here to impress a judge and win scientific facts based on judge impression.
I never did study and gained science like that, and it would be evil for me to do so.
I need to stop what?
Also what part of the science are you not trying to gain judgement from ?
I donât like to be misinterpreted like that, and itâs not good for my engagement in marriage.
It also wouldnât be good for my family, and itâs not good for the army.
Yes, so , without protection, the numbers will increase until the population has the virus, and, related to the overload in the hospital.
New methods should be used to handle more hospital load, by increasing capacity.
Otherwise, that means that the rest of the planet ( /and, or world, I really donât like that word, since it implies a large group of people doing things which are morally wrong ) would have to work to prevent more damage to the US, by devising and working towards increasing capacity for their hospital and so on.
I would think the cause is due to proximity, and other factors , making the virus more potent to be transmitted in those conditions, compared to other places on earth, and other conditions.
Now, there may also be other factors, but , those would have to be found.
Why are there more people in the US contracting the disease more?
Why are is the virus potentially is spreading more in the US than other countries?
Also, how can you not expect the army to be involved with me when it even has to do with my engagement marriage, and delays are not something which will make it a viably good solution for my family. ?
It just makes no sense, never did , never willâŠ
Either that, or , youâre just trying to use language which is designed to be used against me, as in some kind of form of arrests, which I would then have to bring up to courts.
So, for that reasons, and other moral grounds reasons, I have no use to communicate with you.
That is what I have to stop since you try to do so.
It is not a need, or a human need.
I do need security, as does everyone else, and so does my family, and I have to get it somewhere else.
You know, even if the courts misinterpreted and tried to incite others to hate me, doesnât mean the army doesnât find out, or , even have to tell them, and mute them, because they caused war.
Also, how can you expect to save people based on judges decisions,
when the virus doesnât function based on judges decisions.?
Itâs not a criminal action virus. and, it may not act as a weapon, but , be a more natural event.
It not only makes no sense, based on all the attribution of non-sense caused and attempted to be attributed to theft against me and against the morals of my family, which is not only immoral since it related to marriage, but also, deserve to have the same attribution of non-sense, directed back at the authorities abusing the system, and acting based on law, rather than based on science.
They can claim of kinds of reasons for research being related to science , but, it is not the only way science does work, and it certainly wonât be how.
The reason is works as it does is based on facts, and , scientific facts.
Not because of decisions from judge and judges, who may make all the marginalization they want, and try to get away with it with impunity, in deliberate errors of impunity, so much so that the army has to intervene due to their acts of war.
Is this thread serving any real purpose other than offering the two of you a platform to cram as much misinformation as possible up your respective quasi-intellectual asses?
He can continue, however, I have no use for this.
Itâs at least insulting to my family, if not blasphemy against us.
I get that from courts who donât know my family or respect us.
It doesnât help that my lawyer tells them it has nothing to do with it, but the reasons he tells them that in misinterpretation is out of fear, and, because he himself doesnât understand when explained.
To him, itâs obvious that I have to leave instead.
So, I conclude that, perhaps, he should know the army enough even if it was to clarify the facts he misinterpret, orâŠ
Since I already filed against their law society in courts, against their courts and against their insurance, they wonât have a lawyer doing his job, and I canât rely on them to.
Itâs a good thing I donât have to be coerced to be friendly with this , and, neither have to incite my family to be friendly with that, including hiding how they try to interfere against me to get married with them, with all the interference they try to make me do and be liable for doing, in immoral and, more or less, spying act, dirty warfare, as, unconventional warfare.
Not only that, but, even at best, they try to make me look stupid, and, could not give me a good IQ result, because, their best skills for that wonât work with me, due to their psychological warfare , directed against the morals of my family.
To put it in context, I once had a social worker who lied to me about being able and willing to do something if I paid them trillions, when in fact, they already caused too much military and legal programs for them to be authorized to do so.
So, I have to take a sociology course, to deter him from the damages he tries to cause to my family due to morals and, dirty warfare, and , unconventional warfare.
Of course, there is only so much his intelligence informs him about it, and, so shall it be.
However, the fact is and will remain that, it is so.
Usually that, and , abuse of consent, by changing the purpose of it, and using language which has more meaning than intended, and , supported by the courts to be misleading, and , refused to be accepted from them in applications, and requiring military intervention.
It doesnât take military research to find.
Can they research it? Yes.
Hoping to justify their assets, in their asset based systems, created by them, while , trying to justify , and seeking to , forfeit my work, and , assets.
It inevitably leads to war, and , I have to register it for my work, and use it against them, whether under arrest, or, to arrest them.
Itâs the economic warfare, and the negative they base themselves on, which has to be analyzed from them, and used against them, as they use for their asset.
It works like a magnet, with positive and negative .
The positive part of the magnet attracts the negative part of the other magnet.
And the positive part of the repulses and rejects the positive part of the other magnet.
In psychology, it is diverted and omitted.
In fact, it wouldnât matter to him either if I did have 35 years of court cases, 100% of the time, because, they never intended to respect them before, and it wonât ever be of any use for my family to be with them.
Then, they try to make me look like a threat, and , damaging, so to justify more attacks against me, as if they didnât, yet, even go as far as to claim itâs justifiable to do so.
Well, I could never agree with that, and never will.
Itâs not only stupid, it leads to COVID-19.
He is trying to tell me what to do based on his assumption, which, are not only being mislead, but , also , misinterpreted, both by him, and the authorities protecting him, and , working against me.
Thatâs where his analogy and the analogy of the courts system breaks down, as it never worked for me, and never will.
They lie it is, but never did, and never will, and, I had to prove it and how.
In fact, for the negative they try to justify to use, to diminish the loss from the damage they cause, they do 100 to millions of times worst.
It not only diminishes me, but it also intends to control and interfere against my incomes, and justification of the rights from my copyrights and benefit to society, and, competition.
He doesnât take into account the facts related to what he expects.
He doesnât revise the basis of what he makes his assumptions from.
It doesnât matter to him if he tries to mislead me and make me look negative before.
The previous attempts , are not included, even if I had to prove it, obviously not in his court system.
I also donât have the right to try to make my son or wife do information systems analysis for free and have 35 years of their work intended to be forfeited and seek to have it forfeited before, during and after.
Itâs not only unfaithful, but itâs also eternally evil.
It doesnât matter if it gets attacked by the utmost stupid idiocies from mankindâs history and made to look as the most intelligent.
If I use force to coerce them into it, itâs extortion.
I can book them in North Korea for the next generation, even before we get there, for the next 3 generations after, if in 2 generations.
Then, they try to misrepresent me as if attacking them, while they are attacking me, to cover up their attacks against me, and think they can try to make me look like a terrorist against them, and canât see how I would be forced to use their attempt to make me look like that , against them.
Itâs perfectly sane to them.
Which is why everyone is crazy, and some, more than others.
Needless to say, I donât only report courts and space programs to the military about it.
Itâs not how prosecution works in military courts.
In fact, in Canada and the US, once a civilian court has criminal convictions, or, charges against an accused, or group, or entity, like business, the military has to be clear them.
They canât hire them, or, associate with them without it.
Otherwise, they have to leave, because the army has global authority, and, while witness of the crimes in one place from the civilian court system, it might be better for society to be somewhere else, whether due to other opportunities, or, since the civilian court refuses to stop committing more crimes with interference of business, and lie itâs fair competition, or, to justify monopoly, and so on.
The civilian court cannot expect the military to clear them if it is not in the best interest of the accused or society.
Why would they want to clear the court for making false accusation against military security, in act of war against them, and global security?
That is more than stupid.
That law existed before I was 15 and will likely exist after Iâm 100.
The army canât be held liable for that, and they are right.
My sister says that itâs not something she can help me with, even though itâs obviously false, and, maybe itâs because of her husband who makes her thinks that, but, she doesnât have our family name either.
Heâs also not in the army, and , that army.
No, but they tried to interfere against my freedom of movement since 2014, so, I canât live in Canada, nor, let my family die there without having ways to move out.
COVID-19: China commits $2 billion to fight the pandemic
In a virtual address on Monday, Chinese President Xi Jinping pledged $2 billion to back the fight against the virus. He also expressed his support for an independent investigation into the pandemic by the WHO once the health emergency ends.
Positivity: Helping others with plasma following COVID-19 recovery
Itâs also why they try to make false excuses for request of payment, and, offers for services, and other misrepresentation, which, if , not recorded, would have no way to be used against those misrepresenting it in unconventional warfare, as spies.
Also, Iâm not so sure about , when the health emergency ends.
Itâs a pandemic, and, even when solve, the problem may never end, even though the emergency ends.
Sabotage is Unconventional Warfare, whether it is sabotage done from courts against intellectual property or other, or, whether they seek to forfeit the rights from it, and try to justify to coerce what is good into crime.
Assassination and attempts, is also Unconventional Warfare, such as, trying to kill a leader of state, or, military general or admiral, from an assassin.
Some Royals also are in this category, depending.
For instance, one of my ancestor was assassinated, and, his descendant was murdered, not assassinated, due to changes in the conditions of the death.
It was not his direct descendant, and, I believe he was a 2nd or 3rd generation descendant, however, the history books do not keep record of it, since the descendant is from the person who was assassinated.
In fact, there is no sons on records due to it.
However, it is not a good reason to delay my engagement in marriage, and, neither try to hold me liable of the delay.
I then , do not have to hold the ones trying to hold me liable of the delay liable for the delay and trying to hold me liable for the delay, but also for fraud , embezzlement , and worst.
They also try to cause the same lack of control caused by the COVID-19, and, the Virus, as , any other weapons does, and, is also related to real estate, and real estate value, as to how they try to attribute to lower real estate value with incrimination, and, to lower real estate value of people related to the real estate by contract, if they are incriminated, even if the incrimination and indictment is done illegally, and , with ulterior motives which are against, treaties, law, and with total disregard for society and community, with attempts to cover the misleading with false intentions.
As evil does.
Itâs also not the same assassination of character courts try to justify as legal activity to do to others, so that, they would have done onto me.
2 wrongs donât make a right, and, 2 wrongs doesnât make a right.
Just because they try to cover attacks by trying to get away with attacking others doesnât mean that it is ok, and it doesnât mean that it is what law is.
It is what abuse and misinterpretation of the rule of law is though.
Then, theyâd try to steal the work and programming of my family, and son, and, try to cover up with attacks against me, which they refused, as excuse to steal his work, if he tried to protect his family.
Just because the military police has proof that they did commit acts of war against me, doesnât mean that they are not trying to get away with it, instead of confirming how they were being mislead into their activity they try to justify.
Itâs not only trying to steal and create a false sense of fear to make more millions from, but , also try mislead others about their actions.
Assassination of characters apparently also works well for them with attacks against character to discredit them from being good, and even though they try to make it impossible for them to be of good character, act as if they were good to try to do so.
When then trying to claim the person was of good character, the credit attributed to the fact is then less than 1% worth, due to the amount of evil they caused, literally discrediting themselves, while trying to discredit the target of their crimes, and misrepresent it as good.
The same goes for indictment for life, when the government would pay extra costs for a jury, and take the jury time off, when in fact, they may be able to do it by giving a better and more informed decisions, while, they in fact, themselves, refuse that info, they try to coerce into being bad info and spam.
None of those assassination of characters, attacks against characters, and discrediting of character will ever do them any good.
In fact, itâs ground for war.
It would justify war.
Well, it serves them well.
I am also better to organize myself with other systems which wonât try to steal my work and coerce me into their organized crime, or, to be of bad character, for whatever reasons, no matter what.
https://twitter.com/i/events/1262114656539168768
It then leads to this kind of scientific errors and problems, which , funny enough, I even applied to work there, which, the same party interfering, caused, directly.
Itâs false that COVID-19 will go away in warm climates, because, it will be in places with warm temperature, and it is not why it was not in third world countries.
The reason that the COVID-19 virus SARS-CoV-2 virus stop functioning at 27 degrees Celsius, and 81 Fahrenheit, doesnât mean that it doesnât stop functioning about 14 days on surface.
However, that is not how the virus spreads.
Most of the virus spreads from human.
So, even at 50 degrees Celsius, the virus functions in human, and, the temperature in human is over 30 degrees as normal.
The reason is, because it is a living cell, and, not a surface.
So, that is why it only affects the virus on the surface, on surface.
Not by false and misleading numbers you guys vote for and I have to fight in war.
How covid-19 could change the financial world order | The Economist
658,404 views âą May 12, 2020 The Economist
1.34M subscribers
Why Quebec has the worst COVID-19 outbreak in Canada
China hits Australia with barley trade tariffs amid push for COVID-19 origin inquiry
China has imposed tariffs totalling 80.5% on Australiaâs barley imports over claims Australia subsidised its farmers and sold barley into China below the cost of production. The move comes as Australia and the European Union lead calls for a @WHO probe
into the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic. Australia has rejected the basis for the decision, and as Chinaâs biggest barley importer the country is expected to lose AUD$600 million (USD $390 million). More than 100 of the WHOâs 194 members have backed the international COVID-19 probe, including Russia, the US, the UK and South Korea.
COVID-19: Medical experts warn the virus may be a constant threat for some time
Dr. David Nabarro, the WHOâs special envoy warned that COVID-19 may be a constant threat as research into a potential vaccine continues. His words echo what deputy chief medical officers in England and Ireland have also been saying. Read this and more:
Updates: No new reported cases in New Zealand for two days
Positivity: A âprom on wheelsâ gives students a memorable night
Iâm searching notes about name calling since I already found something related to this, as the next level, related to psychological warfare, and yes, military intelligence does know that.
I keep the data offline as it canât be reliably left here , or with this system.
I also get other attacks from other sources and certainly canât be friends with them either.
A lot of your systems and communication is designed to render and make stupid and should be used as the target to prove how you try to do so , whether in act of war, or , other conflict.
I certainly could not let my wife or kid be associated with this in any ways for any amounts.
24 minutes later:
As a matter of fact, that info is missing and not retrieved yet, as it is seem to be made to be harder to retrieve.
I even found it online in regards to analysis on intelligence.
I should register copyright for it with description and use it as evidence against the intelligence attacking me and trying to disrupt my intelligence for work.
It would certainly make the enmity and false offer of friendship and association with ulterior motives to entrap in attacks and as method of attack more clear.
As a matter of fact, I am against that intelligence in court as well (as well as their courts).
Appeal to Authority argumentum ad verecundiam
Etc, those are linked in that Ad Hominem page, and, used it courts, to test.
Poisoning the well can take the form of an (explicit or implied) argument, and is considered by some philosophers an informal fallacy.[1]
A poisoned-well âargumentâ has the following form:
Unfavorable information (be it true or false) about person A is presented by another. (e.g. âBefore you listen to my opponent, may I remind you that he has been in jailâ)
Therefore, the claims made by person A will be false.[2]
May I remind you that I would put them myself in jail and work there and prison, and , hold them as prisoner of war.
Poisoned-well arguments are sometimes used with preemptive invocations of the association fallacy. In this pattern, an unfavorable attribute is ascribed to any future opponents, in an attempt to discourage debate. (For example, âThatâs my stance on funding the public education system, and anyone who disagrees with me hates children.â) Any person who steps forward to dispute the claim will then risk applying the tag to him or herself in the process. This is a false dilemma: not all future opponents necessarily have the unfavorable attribute. (For example, not everyone who has a different opinion on funding the public education system necessarily hates children.)
âŠ
However, anything useful to the advancing enemy may be targeted, including food stores and agricultural areas, water sources, and even the local people themselves, but that has been banned under the 1977 Geneva Conventions.
Fake news, also knows as pseudo-meme.
Not the real meme.
If my kids train in another army, they can fight better against them.
They can just go in to infiltrate and get paid to assassinate their generals.
That and conduct brain surgery on their psychoanalyst, to verify a few facts and for research.
Taking things out of context, and trying to cover up previous attacks, because their records of such attacks were forfeited by the enemy , and , they cannot keep track of what they are doing, and try to justify to forfeit evidence of the enemy to cover up their lack of memory.
Either that, or, try to make friend with the enemy , since they cannot protect themselves if they bought a chicken coup to make some eggs for sale at the market.
They canât see why the target being hit would have any rights or justification for keeping ulterior motives against them.
A difference threshold (or just-noticeable difference, JND) is the magnitude of the smallest difference between two stimuli of differing intensities that the participant is able to detect some proportion of the time (the percentage depending on the kind of task). To test this threshold, several different methods are used. The subject may be asked to adjust one stimulus until it is perceived as the same as the other (method of adjustment), may be asked to describe the direction and magnitude of the difference between two stimuli, or may be asked to decide whether intensities in a pair of stimuli are the same or not (forced choice). The just-noticeable difference (JND) is not a fixed quantity; rather, it depends on how intense the stimuli being measured are and the particular sense being measured.[18]Weberâs Law states that the just-noticeable difference of a stimulus is a constant proportion despite variation in intensity.[19]
In discrimination experiments, the experimenter seeks to determine at what point the difference between two stimuli, such as two weights or two sounds, is detectable. The subject is presented with one stimulus, for example a weight, and is asked to say whether another weight is heavier or lighter (in some experiments, the subject may also say the two weights are the same). At the point of subjective equality (PSE), the subject perceives the two weights to be the same. The just-noticeable difference,[20] or difference limen (DL), is the magnitude of the difference in stimuli that the subject notices some proportion p of the time (50% is usually used for p in the comparison task). In addition, a two-alternative forced choice (2-afc) paradigm can be used to assess the point at which performance reduces to chance on a discrimination between two alternatives ( p will then typically be 75% since p =50% corresponds to chance in the 2-afc task).
âŠ
You can even add the sense of memory from which other sense draw data from and compare, as well as update the system in relation to it.
Did you know that SARS-CoV-2 is more deadly than Inhalation Anthrax and is on par with being on the same level as Weaponized Anthrax?
Do the research, I already have.
Due to the fact that SARS-CoV-2 is very contagious and people will resist getting vaccinated people will still continue to transmit SARS-CoV-2. Some people will develop anti-bodies and others wont.
Those resisting the vaccine and those who donât develop anti-bodies will continue to spread SARS-CoV-2 indefinitely.
Its not guaranteed that someone who has anti-bodies against SARS-CoV-2 will pass those traits onto their offspring thus necessitating the need for at least a 200 year supply of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine.
Remember the 9.11.01 Anthrax Scare in D.C?
What is different about Weaponized Anthrax and SARS-CoV-2 is, WA does spread from human to human like SARS-CoV-2 does.
Therefore SARS-CoV-2 is a weaponized level type of virus, even if it wasnât made in a lab. SARS-CoV-2 is just as nasty if not nastier than Anthrax.
Here are some simple comparisons between SARS-CoV-2 and Anthrax.
SARS-CoV-2 has an incubation period of 2 to 14 days.
Inhalation Anthrax has an incubation period of a 7 days but can be prolonged up to 2 months.
Shortness of breath, cough, and chest pain are both symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 and Inhalation Anthrax.
Anthrax can remain dormant for up to 48 years in the soil.
SARS-CoV-2 can remain active for up to 3 days on stainless steel and plastic, but will remain active indefinitely, within the soil of the human population due to the virus being easily transmitted between humans.
SARS-CoV-2 is extremely contagious and easily transmitted between humans.
Anthrax however only effects those who come into direct contact with Anthrax. Anthrax does not spread from an infected person to another another person like SARS-CoV-2 does.
The tissue scarring that Anthrax does to the outside of the skin is comparable to the tissue scarring that SARS-CoV-2 does inside of the body.
Point number 7 puts SARS-CoV-2 above Anthrax and even Weaponized Anthrax.
SARS-CoV-2 spreads from person to person very rapidly and is always fatal if left untreated after severe symptoms set in just like Anthrax is fatal if left untreated.
So you can see that SARS-CoV-2 is in a dead run finish and is very close to Anthrax.
If you compare Anthrax to the common flu or cold, there is no comparison and Anthrax blows them away.
The same is true for SARS-CoV-2, it blows the common cold and dlu away.
Although Anthrax remains dormant in the soil for up to 48 years, SARS-CoV-2 will remain active in humanity for far longer than 100 years, if not more due to apathy and politics.
Not to mention that viruses in this day and age are very well adapted at changing their structures to overcome attempts to defeat the virus.SARS-CoV-2 will most likely mutate into SARS-CoV-3 and 4, if it it already hasnât done so.
Any time that a virus is neck and neck with Anthrax or actually beats Anthrax, the virus is anything but a simple common cold or seasonal flu.
Did anyone read about the guy who has been stuck on an Italian cruise ship for the past 62 days? He has tested positive for Covid-19, and hasnât been able to pass two consecutive tests in the last seven tries.
He is very Asymptomatic and will never the ship he is on.
Issues like the guy is having are also issues that are taking place in the U.S. and other nations as well.
People test positive over and over again for Covid-19 but never get any sicker requiring a ventilator.
There are people like the guy in the article all over the planet who are continuing to spread the Covid-19 virus against their will and most of the time donât realize that they are spreading it.
People in his situation wonât get tested more than once because they fear the lynch mob dragging them out of their house and burning them at the stake.
Not to mention dragging the children and wife out and burning them at the stake as well.
He never went on a ventilator only quarantine. With more people like him out there in the U.S. most likely still self quarantining at this time, when they come back out into the public, Up the Chimney goes the spike in infections.
If they canât be of any more good character than coerce into being of bad characters as they did to me, and try to cover with corruption, as if it could be forgiven, when they blaspheme my name and that it is to attack my family, and cover those attacks, like if they were not violation of treaties , and trying to coerce us to be terrorists, like if their laws didnât design their legal systems to do so, is also yet more violation of treaties , and, against, what is good characters, and , mislead that, their police and courts and elected officials are of good characters, and that, they do fraud fraud against what is of good characters.
They also intend and intended to engage in moral warfare, and, to do so, intend to try to coerce in non-sense, as nature of their attacks, and make immoral, and , of bad character, what is Holy.
More than 100% of the time, and , beyond the capacity to be forgiven.
You can tell itâs only science-fiction because the sentences are longer than 21 words.
I will read the data.
While it is true that I do studies, because, I am not authorized to do the research you proposed me, not because I reject your proposal, but, because of illegal interference from government in attacks against my rights, and, refusal from them to support me to , and authorize me to , do such research, while giving preferential favor and treatment to others, to do so research on it, which, like you, unless you didnât get authorized to do the research, and conducted it illegally, are not going to complain, as, neither do I, while I do however have military prosecution against them, on moral terms which are more long term.
Also, I didnât know Anthrax functioned by inhalation.
I also wasnât sure if it did affect crops or other resources,
however, I am aware it is designed to get rid of military personnel in a large area, while keeping some of the systems in place operational, compared to the clean-up costs that a nuclear weapon would require, in war.
I also didnât know what source the weapon Anthrax was from since, if someone pays for the research from a government, he obviously doesnât have to do the actual research, since he would be the one paying for it, and may never know what he paid for, even after use, whether or not he did have an antidote for it.
There seems to be potential to make it a weapon, and, there are regulation in place being designed against it, since it is causing military type or, level , damage , and , as such, can be included in treaties.
How is it not so?
Why , would someone with anti-bodies against SARS-CoV-2 not pass the virus by heredity, and, why would he not pass the virus onto others, since , the anti-bodies stopped the virus to make him sick, while , he is still carrying the virus, and, while he may still be contracting the virus, therefore, passing it onto others.
If I get a flu shot, and become with antibodies developed against strains of flu, I will not get sick, however, I can still contract it , and give it to others who donât have the antibody, or, who have antibody.
The antibody may only stop the symptoms from the illness caused without those antibodies.
The problem is not people getting COVID-19, or, the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
The problem is people dying from the COVID-19, without means to solve it.
The problem is hospital being overloaded, and , patients not being able to go to the nearest hospital, in the nearest village, with means to travel securely, without infecting others.
The problem is not being able to implement quarantine, or, 2 weeks of isolation, safe enough to prevent the exponential growth, and stop any growth, and, stop any transmission.
Even local transmission would make the Pandemic an Epidemic, like, they had in China and South Korea.
It takes 2 weeks to 4 weeks to go away, after which , they would be vulnerable to global reinfection from external sources, due to Pandemic, until solved.
However,
(and , this is no less important than that,
the problem is not that people get COVID-19 and so on,
as , it is not meant to be used an an Anchor, )
It does cause problems if people contract COVID-19 from the Virus,
because, if measures are not in place to prevent damage from it,
those more vulnerable to it, whether by location, or hereditary reasons before, or other reasons, or conditions, may die from it, up to 20%, compared to 4% to under 1% death normally, from normal deaths, per year, or, in the case of the disease, around 1 to 2 months or less.
In other words, if everyone had the virus, as the flu, it would not be a problem to contract it, since , they already had it.
Now, while it is not the case, the problem also does include the negative response to this infection, and , medical overload, hospital overload, death of medical staff , infection of leader of country and administration of the courts who design systems for solving the problem.
The reason it is not the case, is because that, when medical system will work to solve the problem, the infection itself wonât overwhelm it anymore. At least , not the same way as it did originally.
Brazil now has increasing problem, however, we have increasingly efficient solution, compared to none.
It would be worst if we couldnât do anything, like, during an Anthrax response with no antidote would be.
Now, it doesnât make it more legal to be attacked by an illegal weapon like Anthrax.
Itâs also illegal for the attacker to use it.
Obviously , itâs possible terrorist developed it if they can acquire Anthrax, whether legally or not.
Also, while I can understand the risk and the implication, I would nonetheless have to verify research , as, I do not pay for it, and, the results are not given to me for benefit.
Remember, I work from studies, which, if not approved by the government , I have to prove why they are wrong, and, it wonât make me able to accept to do research for them anymore either.
In other words, there are conflicts against the source of the research and my work, which, has nothing to do with the results.
It is a matter of character, and, ethics.
Fact is, if I have to make an EDTS to get money, I have to use that to do studies, and, other research results I am not authorized to do certainly wonât be the same results for me, especially not after not having enough due to lack of charity from parties trying to justify it.
While itâs true the research works for you, it may not be as valid for others, especially not if the research is designed to be against them, while being kept unauthorized to do so.
Furthermore, since other research would have to be conducted to include those intentional results of character , for 100% of the time, during that 35 years period to 37 years, it would also affect the resulting generation, also, 100% of the time.
If it doesnât work for you, it seems that is the same result as what they intended to cause.
What benefit do I get from it, and , how is it going to pay me enough, and why is it not instead designed and intended to be used to cause the financial problem?
Also, how is it going to benefit to others, to use the fact, and integrate it in their daily lives, to improve their life, rather than the scientific fact being made negative and evil to them, without enough moral power and forces to be able to prevent the fraud and embezzlement against them, causing them the financial discrimination and death from COVID-19?
Also, what stops others to research Anthrax and develop one that works , while itâs not your research result?
Why would it have to work like your research?
Itâs still illegal unless certain conditions are met.
Youâre going to design system for economic warfare and markets, scientific information systems, from research, and that research is designed to work against me, while interfering against my right and support to do research, while limited to studies, which I have to pay for myself, since , I am attacked against benefiting from my studies, in economic warfare, and, I canât see it?
Thatâs my job, I study intelligence and artificial intelligence for those economic systems.
I study who pays for that, and which university invest what and how.
You give me the info I know where itâs from and how.
It wonât pay me because it is invested to not pay me.
Others invested resources to inform you it didnât pay them.
Itâs an armed conflict.
You lie itâs not.
Oh yes, before I commit crime doing research, I will make sure I donât do it associated with you even though you suggest me to associate with you in crime.
2ndly, I will also make sure that I am obligated to break the law before, since I will have to use it in courts to justify my research, since, it will have been conducted illegally, and is in courts since 2012, and itâs very likely that it will never be of your business if you invested $1,000,000 trillion in itâŠ
Also, if you try to create ethics by obligating people to associate, and, be guilty by association, it will be used against those perpetrating this illegally.
Even if youâre not alone.
Also, while you seem to try to sell me research I cannot be authorized to do, and, Iâm not authorized to, it also endangers my ability to get married and start a family, since it is already proven in courts I have to leave the country due to acts of war against the same moral that keeps you and everyone else in the USA healthy.
You may not have the power to research it, and may never find it, but, when you omit it, may kill another 100,000 people, or more.
So have a good day , and donât bother me.
I donât do business with those kind of things, and my EDTS canât accept those kind of fraudulent offer to me, which, may be supported and justified in courts for others, even if I have to be against them in the same courts, and against the same courts, for the same moral grounds, as well as good character, and, to be of good character, so that I can have a firearms license, and use it for my own defense and , to protect the country I will have to move to, as well as our allies, even if having to do it under the cover of a COVID-19 pandemic, or not.
It would be besides the point, and, a diversion.
I pay $418.72 for one of my 2 storage lockers in which I store my studies, and, may have to store the research you suggest that I do.
That cost for this month, is for being late 1 month , last month, plus this month.
I also have another storage locker.
It totals over $5,000 per year, in storage cost, as other interference occurred this year, against me to move one of those 2 lockers away, and, reduce my costs in half, and, get twice as much space.
I currently get 2 x 5 â x 10 â lockers, or , approximately that size, and would get 20 â x 10 â for half the price I pay now, for the combined units.
So, your suggestion would cost me $5,000 a year, and , I would get no benefit from it, and,
in fact, it would damage me for $5,000 a year, with literally less than 0.01% chance to even break even on my costs, from it.
So no, but, no thank you, and no, but no. And no.
Additionally, you donâ t need to do a business study to find you seek to forfeit my work, and , your suggestions to me and my family are worst than garbage crap.
In fact, theft, and , attempted theft, whether intended to be justified in war and misrepresented as legal civilized action, or not.
In fact, what you offer me is worth less than 1% of my work and would risk forfeiting 99% or more of my work and value, besides the discrediting, and intended justification to discredit, as if to be able to justify against robbers and enemies, while you donât and wonât have authority to.
You donât need business research for that.
Even simple accounting without studies would suffice, and, my studies and level of studies for over 25 years going on 28 years on it, are way more than overkill.
By the way, there are differences between medical experts, and, expertly not functioning.
Both may be medical, expert, however, one is more sick than the other, when compared.
If youâre going to make scientific suggestions to people to improve their system, whether it be , information system, or other, make sure you analyse it enough, and the critical parts, before, not after, to avoid errors and problems, and worst, since , you wonât rely on inaccurate data, but , you rely on facts that are not supported by data.
Also, donât try to use data which is not relevant to the facts.
It wonât work.
Also, 2 systems may seem similar, but, it only takes one critical point in their system to change everything , and produce a totally different outcome, based on the critical point, or, critical points, and no, I donât mean critical points in the sense of criticizing for things to do which should have been done, when in fact, it was not only possible to, but parties are and were directly interfering against it in courts, against the military and , lying about dangers caused to them, they caused themselves while trying to blind themselves and hide attacks , hidden from others, they try to blind.
Itâs better to be blind, deaf and mute, than blind, deaf and stupid.
There are reasons those critical points are the way they are, and , there are reasons why they are created to detect those trying to temper with it and to try to obligate those intended to be protected by their obligation, and, from their intended obligation, which they may try to propagate to others as ok, when it is not, not for them, not in that conditions, even though it is obligatory to other military personnel.
One reason for this is, itâs not of their business.
2nd, they are not in command.
And 3rd, they donât know what they are doing.
4th, they are not expected to know.
5th, they donât want to know.
6th, if there are parts they should know and they refuse to know, they may be detected and it may be used against them, for military reasons, whether in courts or not.
The Spanish Flu: The Greatest Pandemic of the 20th Century
290,017 views âą May 7, 2020 Biographics
1.17M subscribers
The definition of Buy Your Graphics means, buy your graphics.
POW, Purposely Ordered Work.
Purposely, as in, Purposefully.
The reason they couldnât talk was not to gather intelligence, or, prevent intelligence from being sold, but because, if they said so, they could have sold the intelligence, and use that intelligence to disrupt intelligence, and no, you couldnât see a pattern, because , they would not only not say it, but , they also didnât register patents for patterns.
Not to be confused with Al Mitchel, even if they used coffee instead of tea.
Itâs not the same Al, because, he was retired.
What do you think I have to do when they would try to, not only interfere and delay marriage in moral warfare causing evil and ill, but, also, interfere against storage of that fact, including related studies, and try to impose and justify to increase storage costs, so as to do that to others, and justify it.?
I donât think I could hide it, and I think I would have to move due to war.
Theyâre not only corrupt, but, also try to offer a false sense of security, with false sincerity, and, cause undue costs, while trying to justify scam, they lie and misinterpret as good, with no research to prove their value, except , to prove they are .
Not only that, but, if I did work for them, I would have to use the money they pay me for work to expose them to the proper authority, and expose them for trying to hide enmity, and other intent to commit acts of war with misinformation and propaganda.
Not only does their dishonesty leads to illness and death, but , also financial problem, and, it will either be solved after or, during, not before, since they refused 100% of the time before for the result they now reached.
Not only that, but they would also try to make my research seem as if it was not done, as they already seek to discredit me and try to make my studies to be discredited, with the same Discrimination as intended, and refuse to solve the problem they try to capitalize with and incriminate from.
It is a discrediting tactic, but, I use it against them as act of war.
The expression discrediting tactics refers to personal attacks, for example in court cases.
âŠ
Logically, an argument is held in discredit if the underlying premise is found, âSo severely in error that there is cause to remove the argument from the proceedings because of its prejudicial context and applicationâŠâ
âŠ
appellate courts must consider the context and may discredit testimony as perjurious or prejudicial, even if the statement is technically true.
So, while true, their discrimination is the eternal evil they will never solve and try to cause our death from , and interfered against our marriage, and is so evil in fact, I will never be able to associate with them legally, because the perjurious, and prejudicial claims they lie is legal, is criminal and an act of war and blasphemy.
The discrediting from the courts is in fact that much worst that they try to justify and cover up extortion which is monitored by electronic systems, which they try to deny patents for, and so on.
They further try to justify this by trying to justify delay against them to get services from those companies and systems, because they didnât want to pay them for it, while they get money from others, and, while also refusing to provide them security, which they want to credit themselves for giving the companies, to get the money they print, and so on.
So, when they try to forfeit my research , or credit, it makes me be in a condition they create and try to create to make it useless for me to do the research, and, to use their research, as, to do so would be to associate with them in war, as they attack me, and try to do attack me, and try to justify to discredit me as attack against me.
Here is a breakdown incubation periods for the first four U.S. States.
What is interesting is that most states have a predictable time line when new infections will spike.
I have started with the first highest peak in infections and then counted the number of days in between the first spike and the next spike that is higher than the first spike. The spike in new infections could indicate the average incubation period for SARS-SARS-CoV-2 before symptoms emerge.
Example Alabama has a 7,4,26,1,6 days in between in each spike that is more than the initial spike. Finding the median by dividing the total number of days in increased spikes by the total amount of block between infections gives us 44 / 5 = 8.5. 8.5 in this in case would refer to the incubation rate of a person who is infected before they show and symptoms. Every 8.5 days Alabama can expect a spike on increase in new infections since the last major spike in infections that was greater than other spike during the same time period.
2,1,4,1,1,1,10,1,1,1,1,16 / 3.3 Incubation rating Total Cases: 28,952 Likelihood of infection 1/95,541 chance
Regardless of what you watch on T.V. or hear on the radio, the number of new infections is not decreasing. In fact with each state re-opening, the number of new infections will continue to increase and not decline.
Comparison between SARS-CoV-2 and Acute Radiation Syndrome.
You are more likely to survive Acute Radiation Syndrome then a SARS-CoV-2 infection.
The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic is much the same as radioactive fall out from a nuclear power plant.
SARS-CoV-2 like Radiation Sickness does spread to other people. People who are externally contaminated with radioactive material just like shedding SARS-CoV-2, can contaminate other people or surfaces that they touch.
Unless you receive a very high dose of deep penetrating organ damaging radiation, you will most likely survive being radiated.
A high dose of deep penetrating radiation will generally kill you in about 3 hours.
If SARS-CoV-2 is left untreated, death can occur in as little as 7 days.
When a virus such as SARS-CoV-2 is able to run neck and neck with Anthrax and is comparable to a high dose of deep penetrating radiation, the virus is anything but a common cold or the seasonal flu.
America is losing approx 870 each day to the pandemic. During WWII, 220 G.I.'s were killed due to combat operations against the enemy.
âIâm actually calling now . . . the nation warriors,â Trump told reporters at the White House. âWe have to be warriors. We canât keep our country closed down for years.â
Losing more Americans in year one of the Covid-19 pandemic compared to all four years of the U.S. fighting during World War II, really does crush Trumpâs âWar Timeâ president image.
If Trump considers himself to be a Wartime President, then he should really hang his portrait with these 9 worse generals who actually fought in wars.
Are you insane? They are both locked here in a perpetual never ending â â â â â â â â -match. Why would you let them free and endanger other threads by closing this one?
When have you added anything to the thread that helps alert people to outbreaks, lies by politicians and other aspects to help mitigate the pandemic? From what I see, you will simply sit back and allow the world to burn around you hoping you wonât get infected.
Eventually you will get infected as the efforts to erode discussions about the pandemic continue. If you think the pandemic or efforts to mitigate the pandemic is hilarious, I suggest that you do a check of yourself.
This is a serious pandemic. And belittling it in anyway will only cause more infections and deaths as a result.
A mink may have infected a human with Covid-19, Dutch authorities believe
âOn the basis of new research results from the ongoing research into Covid-19 infections at mink farms, it is plausible that an infection took place from mink to human,â the Dutch government said in a statement late Tuesday night.
A highly contagious and fatal virus is spreading in several states. Its victims are rabbits.
Is the spread of the Rabbit Virus linked to Covid-19 at all?
I admire your continuous efforts to safe us all by writing all this important information into this thread Dryson. Iâm not sure what we would do without you. Please continue
I thought there was only 2 posts, but no, there was an error on the thread data notification.
I counted a total of over 5 posts, and I didnât even have the time to read most of it yet, or, more than 80% of it yet (I never read the whole thing first unless I have to work on it, then I read it in full 2 or 3 times or more, and it takes me longer than others to read it and analyze it).
One of the best ways for me not to read it and not lose everything from not reading it, is to use an electronic data storage system, which, stores the reading material and content, and, allows me to read it later.
Unless of course some problems happens against that, which, makes me have to analyze the problem, to find what the problem is, and, the best way to solve the problem.
If itâs not the best way, it means thereâs another way.
Find Da Wae (animation) â Song by CG5
40,128,686 views âą Feb 3, 2018 shgurr
2.25M subscribers
Arnold Schwarzenegger - 5 Minutes For The NEXT 50 Years of Your LIFE
2,932,337 views âą Jul 13, 2018 Video Advice
2.34M subscribers
If I was to limit my work to be based on approval from fraudulent court systems, while not maintaining more integrity in the science I use, to protect my work against their attacks to discredit my work, I would do the same great disservice to society as they are, and taxpayers pay them for.
My work and studies have to work, and I canât rely on them to approve my work, because I have scientific proof and evidence of their fraud and attacks against my work, and that I have to use it against them to prove that they are not only doing it, but that it is also good for them to have the information proven, because that they commit fraud, and because that they are not using the proper scientific method, and, that they are endangering public health and safety and commit fraud.
Not only that, but it would also be organized crime for me to associate with their courts, and request of association for contracts, they lie and do fraud about their own rules of law, they design to break and not follow and lie they do.
4 hours later:
Due to moral warfare against 95% of certain individuals , compared to 50% of marriage divorcing, outside of those attacked from this moral warfare,
it would not be possible or worthwhile for me to try to my my family or, intellectual property rights with those organizations.
They are misleading and attempting to forfeit my rights and work including research I would do, and deny doing it, and attempting to do it.
Anthrax works more locally as a weapon.
It would not cause a global pandemic unless the level of damage was intended to.
This is more global in scope than a biological weapon attack would cause.
Just because they would try to make fun of my rights and my family and my son, and attack us and lie about false and disloyal friendship offers doesnât mean that they donât do that to others, as well as trying to do that to me, as well as the alienation they would try to subject him to, which would also be illegal and criminal for me to do by associating with a system like that, as confirmed and informed to me by CIA officers.
Also, they donât lie to me by trying to make me feel scared about communication about it, since it is illegal to hide it, contrary to those attacking.
Unfortunately for the intelligence, my moral rights are good enough to not only detect it, but , protect it due to their dirty and immoral warfare against it.
Itâs not like if that would stop in 1 or 5, or 7 generations.
The best thing for us to do is to register those intentions against us and use it against the authorities who are abusing their powers, and misrepresenting facts in acts of war and to deceive us and others for their own goals and profit.
It obviously does includes those attacking in this thread and misrepresenting communication as attack , although false to try to justify their attacks, while they try to justify causing more damage than $300,000 in costs, while setting up their own systems to be damaged by others and claim damage to society while they try to entrap them in it.
The courts also does it, and try to get me to hide it, which is illegal for me to do and associate with them.
If I do get bonded to work security, it certainly will never be with them, and only was for a very short period of time, back in 1985 and 1986.
After that, they have been designing their whole security system to be as dysfunctional with the exact same constant discrimination, which they even go as far as to try to justify in courts, while they know full well that it is against international law, which law they even lie doesnât exist.
So, until they sort those moral issues, they will always make fun of them, instead of actually be respectful.
Then , there is this:
5 Eyes, 9 Eyes, & 14 Eyes Countries:
Is Your Privacy at Risk ?
Notice how the emphasis is on Risk instead of security, and, how they try to use privacy as a mean of diversion to cause imbalance and instability to that security, which, if, according to them, they would work for in service , while, if there are security risks, and problems, they are not being of service.
I rather have my security service organized better and, with others.
Secondly, why would I want to have attacks against me private when they should be communicated to the proper public authorities, and , why would anyone want to keep those attacks private and secret and cause identification problems with anonymity, and, a false sense of security, offered with divertive means and intentions, instead of being honest, and , not only promote honesty, but, mislead, due to confusion, or other reasons, even if confusion is also intended, and attempted to be taken advantage of.
Also, since they misrepresent fact, why not use this as proof to gather evidence of how facts would be misrepresented by the same courts, they make false claims of conflict with, when they are allies, and so on.
As traitor does.
I could not trust them.
Most of their proposal is designed for their same false goals and misrepresentation, while omitting facts, and trying to get away with it, instead of solving problems.
They are stupid, and , pay intelligence to develop this stupidity as a mean of diversion.
That is immoral, against moral rights, against moral society, and, war.
So, if Chinese ty to make this seem worst than Anthrax, but, not a weapon, and, worst than a weapon, how is that so, and, how can it be misinterpreted by people in other ways than it is, and cause them to lose contact with reality?
I mean, that is , of course, if they have a contract with reality, because, if they are only going to contract verbally, they are not going to know about written contracts (or, Testaments).
Also, if I have to encrypt my work, by designing encryption programs, because using
âDraft is being edited in another window. Please reload this page.â
othersâ encryption would let them spy on it, due to enemy intelligence spying on them, and I do that, why would I have to be with them, when they attack me, and , they associate with the enemy , due to encryption , and try to sell me crap, and attack me, and try to cover it.?
"
âŠ
When a person creates an original work, fixed in a tangible medium, he or she automatically owns copyright to the work.
âŠ
"
So, if that person owns the rights, and, those rights are violated, and, intended to be forfeited, by causing total loss of any copies, originals, including intelligence to confuse others as to what those rights are, as if making no-sense, and so on, as in âappeal to ridiculeâ, why would they not take it against the entities who attack them, and, does not try to copy and infringe on the right of exclusive right, but, the right to credit of the right of the creation, with intelligence attacks.
Now , they had this, after never including this before, or, enforcing it,
Copyright Infringement Notification Requirements
"
Copyright notifications must include the following elements. Without this information, we will be unable to take action on your request:
"
again,
âDraft is being edited in another window. Please reload this page.â
without it.
Now, I have proof they still wonât do anything, and actually do investigate why and how, and what benefit they try to gain from it, while trying to coerce in crime and organized crime, in acts of war.
The U.S. Government as well as many other governments around the world are lying about the total number of infected and those who have died from the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
The pandemic isnât flattening, weakening or going away. In an attempt to create the perception that pandemic isnât as bad as the media is reporting the pandemic too be, governments are setting strict criteria as to what actually constitutes a âpandemic death.â
The number of those infected and have died in the pandemic are much greater then we are being told.
In most cases, you have too first be tested for the virus and test positive and then get treated for the Covid-19 infection for the infection to actually count towards the pandemic.
If you donât get tested and get treated for Covid-19 but then die, your death is ruled due to âother underlying medical medical conditions as a result of death,â even though Covid-19 was in your system, because you didnât get tested first and test positive for Covid-19 before dying, Covid-19 wasnât the cause of death.
Examples of people not being counted as Covid-19 deaths, even though when they were found dead, they were in fact infected with Covid-19.
victims who never sought medical care out of fear or testing positive to an illegal drug in their system
heart attacks and strokes
as well as people who suffered heart attacks and strokes, avoided hospitals due to fear of infection,
died without treatment at home.
Governments around the world are in fact lying about the pandemic to create the illusion of being able to control the pandemic so as to make people return to work. Those who are running out of money who exist solely on people working are the investors and investment managers. These types of people make their money by not doing anything other than collecting interest payments from investments that workers put their money into. If the workers arenât working the Glass Bubble Investors arenât making any money.
Why Florida canât get its story straight on Covid numbers
Updates: Modernaâs vaccine trial shows promising signs
Positivity: Helping others with plasma following COVID-19 recovery
