I unfortunately didn’t have the opportunity to try that yet, because that I did have to actually do work for that, and had to report that and you to the administration of an hospital working for that, who also does report to other organizations related to this, including the WHO and are allied with the US Army medical department even if that is only after the 1820s, since they had a military armed conflict about this from 8 years before then.
Mhh, yes, so, whatever you think, if you are more insane, it is not better.
It’s not based on thinking, it’s based on facts, scientific facts.
It is not affected by someone’s thinking anymore than it should.
It would otherwise taint the result and affect the efficiency of the scientific system, including the scientific methods, besides the low level of integrity.
Just because you attack integrity by removing support doesn’t mean that you don’t, and, if you disintegrate the integrity, it does also remove it, and it also leaves traces of how you intended to remove it, expressed though your will.
Just because everyone says something or a group or activity is sane, doesn’t mean that it is right.
Just because no-one says something or a group or activity is right, doesn’t mean that it is wrong.
Similarly,
just because everyone says something or a group or activity is wrong, and less sane, doesn’t mean that it is right.
Just because no-one says something or a group or activity is wrong, doesn’t mean that it is right.
That is limited to operational feasibility.
It’s also my duty to provide my fiancée with what she needs so that we can get married, including sanity, peace of mind, security of the soul, and all other related needs, whether attacked in psychological warfare or electronic warfare or Pandemics due to a failing medical system and professional working in that system trying to get away with over $8 trillion damage.
I certainly don’t have the right to trust them to provide my fiancée, and, would have to hold them liable if they tried to do so, and would have to hold them liable if they tried to hide their intentions to do so.
Just because someone tries to hide the wrong thing doesn’t mean that it is right.
Just because someone tries to hide something to use as a weapon created from the lack of knowledge that they try to propagate, and then use it against their target also doesn’t mean that it is right.
It requires other parts, which, again, if other things and actions and facts are hidden, and intended to, so to capitalize on their target, may very well be ill intended.
It is the ill intention, and, even intention to make good intention to be bad, and, disregard of the conditions that good intentions are done in, with, and so on, that can causes the action to be ill intended, because, the disregard itself may as well be ill intended, yet, again, the exact same mental problems, repeated more than 4 times, successively, each of them misrepresented as legal, sound, profitable, and so on.
If discerning from the confusion and those hidden things is not done properly, it can also lead to other ill intent, since those creating the conflict designed to be against the peace of mind and public order intend to do so.
It’s like if, someone who tries to steal my inventory program to discern from those things, because they didn’t want me to associate with them, even though they would violate my rights, even though they caused me to be unable to associate with them, because they violated my rights, and violated military treaties, wanted to do so to my son, and wife, and that I would not know about it because their intent to forfeit my rights to that inventory and the program, and the intellectual property related to it, is to cause me to lose track of it, which my inventory program can record.
So yes, if I’m to transfer those rights, from forfeiture, or other, to them, instead of some thief who lies about protecting me, I would make sure I not only detect it, but also analyze the potential risk of embezzlement and design systems to prevent it.
In fact, that is how the wars are started.
And, when countries misinterpret interference to stop damage as damage itself, conflicts start.
Illness happens which may cause more damage than wars.
To disconnect the facts from reality instead of solving the problem fuels the problems.
It called , loss of contact with reality, even if something or entity is intending to cause the loss of contact with that reality.
It is not loss of contact with false reality and fake news.
–
Just because everyone doesn’t want to wear a mask because they can get $5 trillion more is Operational Feasibility.
Just because everyone try to marginalize someone and abuse their human rights, is Operational Feasibility.
It might not be right, it might not be the best, however, when people decide that it is what they want, and that it is what the popular support and decision of those people are, they do it.
That is partly how election work , in a democratic system and tyranny.
Both have Operational Feasibility and it is why they function.
De Facto system also do have Operational Feasibility.
De Facto system means that the Operational Feasibility is not following laws, and, is not justifiable because of the disregard towards the violations of those laws and principles, and rules, which would make it justifiable.
Just because everyone wants COVID-19 by Operational Feasibility and create lack of knowledge to pay for knowledge and hide their intentions to boycott others doesn’t mean that it is not Operational Feasibility .
Just because you and your doctor are sick or more sick doesn’t mean that others also are not sick.
In fact, your doctor may be so sick that he died from it, or, went on a rampage and killed over 50 other people, just because they tried to alienate him and tried to get away with it with false excuse against National security and Global security.
In fact, if you came in this thread and misrepresented people to insult them , about that they are not sane and didn’t try to be more sane, and tried to get away with it, and sought support to cause it would create the same problem, in their related and respective degrees, which professional like me analyze and compare numbers.
Just because I make a business out of it doesn’t mean that it is not how the human brain function,
and ,
just because I make a business out of it doesn’t mean that it is not how the human brain should function,
and ,
just because I make a business out of it doesn’t mean that if the human brain doesn’t function like that, that it is not cause by ill intentions to do so to it from external entities, lying it’s legal to do so.
It doesn’t mean that , if someone tried to authorize to interfere against my business, while trying to embezzle my work, that I don’t have security systems in place, and ready to improve their development to solve the problems they created, gather evidence from fact findings of how they tried to justify it, even though illegal to associate with them to do so, and , illegal to hide them in their intents to do so, that I won’t design systems to prevent it, and to keep my business good, and to interfere against their coercion into making my work to be evil and bad and so on.
In fact, I should not only plan to use it against them for life for trying, and get the proof of how they tried to justify it, but I should also seek to make money from it, and perhaps also refuse compensation from them, especially if they are going to try to use it against me to delay my work and forfeit my rights and so on, such as other forms of psychological warfare, as if I didn’t have prevention for it against them due to their acts of war and attacks against me.
In fact, there is a meeting this week about this, until next Tuesday.
It’s funny when people like you come in and try to not only discredit me for making me be seem to not be with those organization, which is terrorist in essence to try to remove someone from their system, and trying to make them seem like if they didn’t respect others, and then try to get away with their intent to do so to others, disrespecting their refusal of communication, which they try to justify to attack other with the same UN .
Not only that, but I do also have to report them to the UN for acts of war , due to their lack of discerning from facts, which they try to justify their income and asset based system or any other system they try to justify since they omit the facts in error of Impunity.
This meeting is about the creation of the UN after the war for peace.
So, yes, if you want to start a war, now would be a good time to remove those working from it, and not think it would be detected.
–
43 minutes later:
#UNGA75 General Debate Live - 24 September 2020
18,110 views • Streamed live on Sep 24, 2020
United Nations
843K subscribers
–
#UNGA75 General Debate Live (Pakistan, Palestine, Canada, & More) - 25 September 2020
322 watching now
Sometime starts around 3 PM, in 23 minutes, 1 minute to 5 minutes before.
–
In fact, in my duty to work for them, I have to report the intentions to not make me work for them, and I have to report my analysis of the details related to how entities try to make me not work for them, and try to design systems to try to interfere against my capacity to work for them, from psychological warfare against them, in acts of war against them, which, even though potentially less damaging than terrorists attacks, still supports the terrorism.
Especially if they did that and associate with people who do that and try to do that since April 13, 1983.
They also try to make them to be unable to meet the global needs.
Even if it is in acts of war against them and to misrepresent them and to try to get away with misrepresenting them, to abuse financial assets.
If I had to invest $300,000 in a system to prove how they tried to forfeit $300,000 and transfer rights from my intellectual property and interfere against me prosecuting them, and trying to mislead military, they would need electronic systems to detect it.
If the embezzlement of the $300,000 or other amount caused over a million ($1 million dollars) in damage, even at less than a 400% business profit, by 25% less or more, that ratio can be calculated and used to hold the parties liable for the intention to forfeit the value .
If they tried to forfeit evidence to hide the actual and factual value of those intentional damage caused to the work, while trying to create marginalizing systems worth more than millions, while people died of poverty and attrition in war of attrition and attrition of knowledge by misrepresenting diversion and other psychological warfare, they should also be held liable for the intended mental problems they tried to cause , fraudulently so.
If they did try to interfere against military security and misrepresent the US as if doing internal work to get terrorist to attack them, in treason against the US, they should be held liable of their acts of war and treason against the US, and for attacks against the US Army medical department costs and payment of $50,000 in the 1950s, now worth over $500,000 in 2020 US dollars.
–
Then, they go and try to misrepresent that to the family of those related, like if it is legal for them to do so.
No wonder why they are banned from Interpol.
That’s even more provocating and coercive than stupid.
Then they come and lie to me that I too can coerce them into all kind of wrongdoing , as they are supported to do onto others, omitting the fact that their own action is not good, but also the level at which it is not good, and the global health problems it causes, trying to hide the cause, as if it would not cause more problems, because they were able to hide cause before.
–
I’m glad some sniper classes are in better places than that.
It helps to get rid of the mental problem more efficiently.
–
Spain - President Addresses General Debate, 75th Session
79 views • Sep 25, 2020
6 views - 2 minutes ago
–
Tuvalu - Prime Minister Addresses General Debate, 75th Session
160 views • Sep 25, 2020
150 views - 36 minutes ago
This is the worst (and a worse) Socio-economic problem of the deceny.
–
Pakistan - Prime Minister Addresses General Debate, 75th Session
4,947 views • Sep 25, 2020
3.2K views - 45 minutes ago
–
Started live, not pre-recorded audio-video,
2 minutes ago.
–
https://science.sciencemag.org/content/272/5269/1755.full
https://science.sciencemag.org/content/314/5797/267.abstract
A speaker for Kiribati, or, the Republic of Kiribati,
mentioned about marginalization of communities, in critical times.
To target those needing more to be provided more in critical times, such as COVID-19.
… percentage of development to be measured in proportion of where it is needed more…
–
39 seconds ago
A creative way to protect yourself against the #Coronavirus #retailtech #ecommerce #marketing #ehealth #AI #IoT
@MargaretSiegien - @Nicochan33 - @mvollmer1 - @kuriharan - @PawlowskiMario - @Droit_IA - @ShiCooks - @mvollmer1 - @DrJDrooghaag - @JolaBurnett
–
2 hours later, 1 hour after the previous update:
The UN managed to do a live stream with rewind embedded, back again, after they had removed it from live streaming systems…
–
From Luxembourg, not Belgium:
ilk
/ilk/
noun
- a type of people or things similar to those already referred to.
“the veiled suggestions that reporters of his ilk seem to be so good at”
Similar:
type, sort, class, category, group, set, bracket, genre, kidney, grain, species, race, strain, vintage, make, model, brand, stamp, variety, family
- ARCHAIC•SCOTTISH
of the place or estate of the same name.
noun: of that ilk ; plural noun: of that ilks
“Sir Iain Moncreiffe of that Ilk”
CoViD-19.
Corona Virus Disease from 2019.
–
10 hours later, 7 hours after the last update:
Distributing the COVID Vaccine: The Greatest Logistics Challenge Ever
434,735 views • Sep 23, 2020
435K views - 2 days ago
Wendover Productions
2.71M subscribers
CC
