Actual conclusion: you need an AI to write a post that contains more than an insult or a meme.
If someone consistently gets the meaning of a sentence wrong, consistently makes math errors, consistently gets EVE fundamentals wrong (like not knowing the difference between their corp and the alliance their corp is in), then yes I’ll point out that they’re either lacking in comprehension, failing to read properly, or making errors out of ignorance.
It’s an ad hominem to make a personal attack in lieu of an argument or rebuttal. Since I make quite thorough arguments and rebuttals, and detail what the error or flaw the person is making actually is, that’s called “pointing out the flaw in your argument”.
Pretending ignorance isn’t there doesn’t make the ignorance a valid argument.
And honestly, ganker apologists being so ‘woke’ and concerned because someone else’s reading comprehension is being questioned, with examples to prove the case?
Give it a rest. Read your own posts.
That’s ad hominem. Learn your references before you get an AI to write them for you.