Unfortunately, to call people criminal is no more legal than the act that made those criminals to be criminals, even if not called criminals.
Additionally, to coerce people into crime to cover up slander and communication gap in relation to libel and slander is not more legal than the crimes those criminal are falsely prosecuted and possibly indicted for.
It just doesnât make sense that crime would be only related to how people sneer at them, without the actual crimes be based on facts and not only on case law which takes crimes out of context, therefore actually itself as the legal system, creating the crimes,
and, being organized with those criminals themselves to do so.
â
Crime is about actual activity which is against the law,
while not omitting actions of others in regards to the analysis of the psychological interpretation of the actual action.
Surely the judges psychology and interpretation of the facts is not a psychologist, even though they study it.
Additionally, psychologist are not psychiatrist either.
So, when the law and society try to coerce someone into crime,
causing those people to be mislead into social assistance,
due to damages caused to them by the same society prosecuting them unfairly, and, while omitting their own attacks,
those laws are not doing themselves a favor,
and, are acting with mental problems which causes them the crimes they blame others for, from their very own actions against those same targets, with the exact same mental problems they want to project onto others, so as to free themselves from the problems they cause and aggravate, over and over, and more and more sick, and, more and more crazy, all the time, while trying to alienate others from it, and misleading them into their false beliefs, which make believe they project onto others, and they seek to project onto others, which is still the same omission they seek to omit to justify omission to omit the omissions.
It unfortunately does in fact works the opposite because it shows not only how sick they are, but, also, how sick they try to make others from their own team group actions.
â
Youâll also notice that,
the same prosecutors like to take things and facts out of context,
so as to seek to justify discrediting others, so to credit themselves,
and, when those actions they did against their target try to point out the facts and actions,
they try to further justify the same social abuse, from the same groups who seek the omit the same omission they sought to omit and misrepresent facts in falsification of reports,
none of which is legal and in the public interest of course,
and, also, each of which is greatly increasing not only the risk to society and public interest it poses,
and greatly outweigh the risk posed to public interest and society,
by taking the same risk to society and public interest out of proportion, the exact same way every time, and always with the same intent to omit facts as to the levels of which this is done, sought, and achieved,
always seeking to confuse and hide facts of the damage they cause,
and also, which greatly works against public interest,
which public interest greatly outweigh the false risk they make constant allusion about and want to have used for life.
Wrongfully so, and, also against the accused wife,
and, future offspring, as well, as it was proven,
in sought psychological warfare against the public interest,
and while trying to create interest into abusing this public interest,
while seeking to use and abuse the benefit given to this same public interest, with the same abusive ways, they seek to set precedents for,
so they can give themselves the false sense of belief that it is legal to seek precedents which are against public interest,
if they can get away with it before, which they seek to justify to get away with the same communication gap, which communication gap, they rule with, and seek to secure their works with.
Well, itâs no wonder what the encryption and omission is used for.
It is used to cause damage and justify attacks against those they seek to justify to make seem as âbell endâ.
â
Bitcoin is more a traded asset on trades than actual physical property.
Anytime forfeiture is caused to the encryption,
the whole value is lost,
which is exactly how they used the first $5 in Bitcoins,
which is now worth $15,
and value of encryption which is forfeited,
unless I recover it,
will further increase.
I do however, have another $15 invested in it,
which just grew positive in value again,
to around a few cents before the first dollar over that $15.
Additionally,
I also have another $50 in new Crypto currency potential,
which I will be able to use to buy Dogecoin with,
which is being delayed from the first communication gap problem from the first company which I am in courts against with the army, since 1987+.
They also offer me Police Clearance for this,
which was also delayed to after another case,
with this same communication gap,
which communication gap they still seek to do and justify as I write,
which I obviously have to be in courts against for my marriage and to get our first child due to their attacks against my morals,
which morals by the way are directly linked to my family name,
not just some theory, whether they be scientific theories,
like the theory of relativity,
which designed about the same time that IQ systems were designed.
1904
The first ârealâ IQ test
The first modern intelligence test in IQ history was developed in 1904, by Alfred Binet (1857-1911) and Theodore Simon (1873-1961).
â
The theory transformed theoretical physics and astronomy during the 20th century, superseding a 200-year-old theory of mechanics created primarily by Isaac Newton.
â
1905
Who came up with the theory of relativity? Albert Einstein. He published the first part of his theory â special relativity â in the German physics journal Annalen der Physik in 1905 and completed his theory of general relativity only after another decade of difficult work. ~ Apr. 13, 2018
â
Which, as you know, is used for the encryption as well as CPU design and going to the moon and outside of the solar system,
for the exact same moral reasons.
â
While you can technically transfer Bitcoins Assets into other forms of more physical assets for those Bitcoins,
they are still related to how those who issued those physical assets for Bitcoins,
such as Bitcoins bonds, or,
perhaps some other forms of physical Bitcoins tickets,
which could be traded,
the relative value for which they are respected to be traded at.
When someone attacked the values of my Bitcoins,
against the values of my inventory programs,
against the values of the inventory records in my inventory programs,
my inventory programs calculate the value of which they are devaluated,
and,
use this sought devaluation of the inventory or sought forfeiture against the value of the intellectual property of my work,
so as to not only calculate the exact amount of damage sought from propaganda against it,
but, also, more physical forms of attacks against it,
including electronic warfare and other acts of war,
sought to be justified and requiring communication of those actions to the Special Operations Media Relations.
â
Still, when the gold is valued at $1 per ounce,
the same can happen to Bitcoins.
However, people still use gold as value to back other things with,
which, Bitcoins is not currently being used for.
Then, there is of course the encryption issue,
which, since it is software and hardware encryption,
and some other form of physical encryption,
also has to do with trade secret,
which gold does not have.
Additionally, there is the Trade Secret issue for software as well,
as, if the software is used against the law,
it is illegal.
So, when people object to software they falsely deem to be damaging,
when it is not, so as to credit themselves for discrediting others,
it is also used against the law.
The same for when they use software to cause damage and disrupt service to humanity such as causing them physiological damage to cause a pandemic by attacking software which is of benefit to humanity, due to other sought communication gap from sought forfeiture,
which forfeiture was not legal to be sought,
and, which sought forfeiture was a theft attempt,
and which forfeiture was theft.
â
The same happen when banks do fraud and when government do fraud with banks, and seek to cause people to pay for their fraud, which is illegal for them to do so, and which is illegal for them to hide.
Theyâre both organized crimes.
Just because the law tries to incriminate someone by putting them in prison for false crimes with false imprisonment to lie about the law, is still the same same organized crime, and is still not justifying the organized crimes.
They are also financial crimes because they embezzle and extort by use of force, against public interest, and, yes, potentially against Special Operations.
It is a misrepresentation of the law, and a fraud.
To try to make it seem irrelevant when it is directly related with Special Operation and military intelligence is also a fraud.
