They are by the way in Canada with the same system who tried to do Federal fraud against my intellectual property,
for the same inventory programs,
of the same Electronic Data Transaction Systems,
which is not protected by people saying they donât know what is it about and donât understand it,
but which is attacked by those.
Also, yes, the same army from the same country who works with the same NATO offers me police clearance because the same Canadian provinces attacked my work and rights and code and mental health and engagement in marriage, so much so I have to get a religious marriage for it, and due to it.
So no, you canât be allowed to abuse my family with sympathy from you.
It simply will not be acceptable.
Everything is or will be taxed. Crypto is not the solution as it will be regulated also if hitting larger adoption. If. Before that happens, some people may wantt to cash out, leaving âgreater foolsâ with nothing but holding bags.
Also, the wealthiest will became even more wealthiest.
Around 2% of network entities control 71.5% of all Bitcoin
And more whales who play speculative investments entered since 2020.
The amount of very influential people who can attempt to cash out in such sanity defying price for an internet software token is rather limited.
Satoshi is one of those entities.
Itâs not by trying to make me look crazy or by alienating me that they will justify those people making money with sanity.
They would simply by charged with Anti-trust and their money fined from the government in retaliation for harm caused to honest people who do not seek to monopolize control of money abusively, and, make their sanity seem to be good, when they in fact interfere against the flow of money.
â
By the way, they can also tax Bitcoins.
Itâs obvious that if you try to misrepresent sympathy in dishonest ways, that,
sympathy from those dishonest source canât be worth it,
since it would only be used to deceive into their intentions.
Itâs also why itâs not worth it to try to get sympathy from parties who are only seeking to enforce sympathy towards attacks, and the same attackers, and sympathy towards the lack of knowledge about those attacks,
and sympathy towards forfeiture of evidence of how they sympathize with false sense of sympathy,
which sympathy in fact is related with honesty rather than deceit.
Honesty is a virtue as well by the way,
and it does not deceive with procedures,
procedures misused against due process,
to deceive with a false sense of sympathy.
Sympathey.
For instance,
if I offered sympathy to my mother,
it would not be plagued by pandemic from others.
It appears you are extremely out of the loop. Crypto is already slowly replacing currencies in many countries. And those countries even allow crypto tax payments. The U.S. SEC has green light to be open minded towards cryptocurrency.
Point is itâs way more than just an idea. Half the posts people are complaining about things thjat already exist OR are in development. the issue and not really an issue, its adoption. Moneygram adoption XRP would be huge as far as overall acceptance of âcryptocurrencyâ. Cyrptoocurrency is literally safer in every way, lets you control your own money, and not have to disclose amounts to any government and NO monthly fees. Very very small trans fees instead.
Anyone who is crying because they want to pay unnecessary taxes, and hates money, is suspect to me.
Itâs just a shame to see silly comments like âsell nowâ with NO proof of their doubt, like none at all. but plenty of proof of legitimacy from the other end. Not attacking you just pointing out itâs a process they all do.
Last month Elon Musk was like âDogecoin to the moonâ and made millions off his statement which the SEC will destroy him with if they wanted too now. Then a week later he says âBTC is not safeâ with no proof of course and watches markets dive. Just sad and confused because heâs uneducated in the space.
All i know is, i havenât had to work in 3 months because of my scary crypto investments. Same risks as pub stocks, just donât be stupid.
I am going to invest all my retirement savings in the South Sea Company. What could go wrong?
That is crazy though,
that would lead to crimes indeed.
The same for sales tax.
â
The same for,
if they try to adopt with sympathy,
to cover attacks confirmed from the army, and the military police,
which deals with the public interest,
and which mandate is to work for the public interest.
whether those attacks are attacks against the well being of my fiancée,
which attacks not only makes her tired,
but, are also designed to create communication gap,
and divert from the fact by parading those attacks as good self-control,
and, legal control, when it is not, cannot be, and, they illegally seek and sought to justify to forfeit evidence of those facts,
as well as illegally trying to silence against public interest.
So yes, it not only made her tired, but security caring for her also have the right to engage with the rules of engagement in regards to the engagement in marriage as well as other intended diversion with forfeiture seeking to create communication gap,
including encryption, also used for electronic warfare,
and adopted methods to take communication out of context,
and to associate with the associates they associate with to validate this.
â
They canât steal value of money by transferring assets in Bitcoin and hope the government canât use the army for it or against it.
There are already electronic data transaction systems the government uses which systems they are already proven to do fraud with which the military also knows.
They canât put money in crypto and hope to use it to evade tax.
Thatâs tax evasion, and yes, if I did get police work for it,
yes, I would invest to investigate it and publish it,
and keep the parts which should be kept secret and unpublished to those seeking to spy on that info which info is safeguarded against them to know, which is for the courts to find out,
for the same security reasons,
even if they illegally garnish wages for house paymentsâŠ
if investors can be prevented from withdrawing their funds, then the scam can persist for longer than it otherwise would, especially if new investors can be brought into the scheme.
Sure you can. In a country where thereâs no laws pertaining crypto currency (even as users are begging for attention), or taxes around it, itâs smart to avoid taxes legally while you can. Makes all the sense in the world. Your not getting a beer or a pat on the back for saying " i paid my taxes" and itâs not a goal anyone tries to achieve in life, itâs something everyone wants to avoid legally the best they can. I mean my past US President avoided paying taxes, says it all.
Personally, i donât look âupâ to any country though and believe citizens need to be able to have full control of their own money and not have to pay crazy fees, for literally nothing. Charging for computerization (a click of a button to process something) with limited access to your own assets is a true ripoff and makes no logical sense. Again, i know there are somehow who try and put on their suits, ties and top hats and are excited to pay taxes at the end of the year thinking it makes them a bigger person.
Wish i could quote better sorry ( hate this cheap forum software)
Considering a currency. You should google which countries have their own official cryptocurrency, and it beings used heavily in those countries. Old news though.
So iâm a decentralization fan, not centralization.
I believe everyone should have full access to their wallets and private keys. At that point, people are held accountable for their own stupidity and no need for FDIC at that point. Wonât happen though because people refuse to move forward (understandable in some points) like getting used to having a digital wallet, and making the inevitable erraneous transfers to the wrong address.
But these are all things being worked on being hundreds of companies and funded by huge companies. The biggest difference i see is it being federally insured and holding people accountable. You canât get your wallet just hacked, the reason would 100% end up being your own fault. Banks hate and love this aspect because itâs a threat to their survival but if they adjusted their terms and operated based on self responsibility (no coverage on stupidity) they would thrive.
Again, itâs not criminal to AVOID paying taxes on cryptocurrency if itâs NOT a taxable asset/item. Again thatâs called taking advantage of an opportunity before being screwed. This is where you get no points for saying âhey guys i did things the way the government wants high five meâ Nothing wrong with a loop hole and it is NOT illegal, like at all. Hence the reason thereâs so many new laws being developed around regulation.
So yes, if you get crypto in a country wheres itâs TAXABLE, yes that would be illegal and make you a criminal. if you want to wait on your profits until the government can create a law and tax you on it in the future, that kind of makes you, um, dumb.
As far as transfer fees and monthly fees with banks thatâs one of the biggest issues. I mean if Zelle was made free at ALL banks the world would be different but itâs not. Most banks charge for instant transfer at a crazy prize or free but takes 2-3 days. Nearly all would prefer to pay a typically a few pennies per transaction as opposed to a monthly fee, and crazy wait times to process your own money.
Again, it looks like you need more education donât get defensive, you need to learn what a loophole is. Itâs not illegal, like at all. You get no brownie points for discrediting a loophole just a high 5 from the government my friend. Main point here is everyone should check their own jurisdiction before getting hypnotized by all these turn offs your trying to point out.
In a country thatâs accepts crypto like Switzerland, you more than likely have nothing to worry about. In the U.S., were not quite their for official taxation. They JUST started asking us on tax forms âDid you buy crypto?â. Itâs not taxable and they cannot go back (yet) and say you owe us for that crypto you bought and sold 3 years ago. The days of making money off Bitcoin are gone only if you canât afford it, just saying. Which is usually where saltiness from people come from. They either lost, missed out and canât afford to get back in with the rest so they throw a fit. Again, donât take that personal iâm just comparing to the typical person whoâs against crypto without reason.
I can appreciate some of your debates, i just believe if you fail to want to learn and move off then you need to be left in the dust. A lot of NON tech savy people learned the hard way when COVID hit. Crypto is much safer from hackers, 100% without even a serious debate needed. Crypto is not safe from user fault/stupidity, which is where the insurance would needed. Itâs 2021, if you donât have a single anti-virus on your computer, and watch porn, you have issues and are part of the problem of learning. Antivirus is a standard, not having a password like 1234 is a standard and no company wants to offer insurance for that level of user stupidity thereâs no point and itâs better to hold people accountable so we can ALL have a better system.
@Lucas_Kell I think KYC will need to be centralized and probably be the only piece the crypto community ends up having to let them get involved in.
The numbers may be really low. So effect of it will be miniscule then.
It will still not liquidate other issues common with cryptocurrencies. It will only make anonimity go away. Taxation will be possible and that will eat some gains, but âthe stonks only go upâ.
Am I the only one who was alive when the US forced everybody to comply with their draconian banking rules? People really think bitcoin is going to be kept secret and unregulated? Welcome to planet Earth, guys.
Lucas_Kell already covered most of your nonsense, so Iâll just add a couple more points:
The SECâs approval is meaningless. All theyâve done is say âwe have no legal objection to bitcoinâ. They have not in any way endorsed it as a good idea or claimed that it has long-term potential.
All i know is, i havenât had to work in 3 months because of my scary crypto investments.
Do you honestly not understand that lots of people make a bunch of money from market bubbles? If you time it right you can get rich from it, if you time it poorly you can lose everything. But the fact that some people make a profit is not an argument that bitcoin isnât a bubble.
No, itâs tax evasion. Taxes apply regardless of which medium of exchange you use. If you receive payment you owe income taxes on it. If you make money from selling an investment at a higher price than you paid for it you owe capital gains taxes. The fact that in some cases the government is unable to trace your transactions and prove that youâre guilty of tax evasion doesnât make it anything other than tax evasion.
Also, itâs only âsmartâ to avoid paying taxes if youâre an edgy 14 year old who just discovered Ayn Rand for the first time, and/or a rich sociopath who deserves to be shot for their crimes. Out in the real world adults understand the benefits of the things taxes pay for and donât feel entitled to benefit from those things while refusing to contribute to society.
and not have to pay crazy fees
You do understand that bitcoin also requires fees, right? And once bitcoin payment processors add customer service support, fraud protection guarantees, etc, they will end up charging higher fees than conventional banking and payment systems because of their vastly higher infrastructure costs?
Charging for computerization (a click of a button to process something)
OMFG HOW DARE THEY CHARGE YOU FOR A SERVICE THEY ARE PROVIDING.
If you donât want to pay fees youâre free to not use the services they are offering to sell you. But itâs utter lunacy to expect banks to provide you with a service for free just because you hate paying for things.
Crypto is much safer from hackers
Utter nonsense. If my bank is hacked fraud protection guarantees and federal insurance protect my assets and I lose nothing. If my bitcoin wallet is hacked I lose everything. Youâre once again committing the bitcoin fanboy mistake of defining security purely in terms of software engineering instead of the final risk to the user.
I was alive but never knew that.
â
They try to attack my fiancée w/
frauds and threats of imprisonment
when reported + lies they
donât know + canât helpâŠ
Plus (+) try to
abuse w/ lies about not
being able to help in acts of war,
confirmed by
military police.
Plus (+) theyâre trying to take
things out of context
w/ false accusations
to raise false alarm
plus (+) lie they believe
it, when they
know they try to do that.
â
Plus (+) lie about crimes & abuse
reports of crimes w/ false charges
about false report of crimes
& intent to divert.
& try to abuse people
w/ false denial about police clearance,
from police clearance & fraud.
Plus (+) embezzle & intent to enslave with falsification of report about self-control.
â
Itâs obvious I canât try to get my fiancĂ©e to have to be associated with them due to their intent to get by association,
and also due to how they try to misrepresent threats as if good to society and safe for my fiancée as they try to tire her with attacks,
and seek to abuse her with misinformation and economic boycott as confirmed from the military.
They also try to twist facts to abuse by deliberate errors of impunity in psychological warfare, trying to create false lack of knowledge when they intent to abuse by abuse of control and attacks against self-control and ganging up with electronic warfare against inventories of those attacks.
That is why they are much better to be registered for by paid copyright as they seek forfeiture of their attacks in acts of war against the facts.
The facts canât be protected by copyright to stop others to from copying as itâs news, however, if the facts are not described as non-fiction, and registered as such, which I only do, their lies and diversion as per Churchill document about that truth must be bodyguarded by army of lies is false, as their lies about my association with wrongs of others they seek to justify after I get defended and warrants to arrest them due to war.
They also lie about subjects and complement by making false subsections with intent to derail out of context in attacks against inventories of facts, inventory program and intellectual property, fight over accounting records, seek to forfeit records of loans, fake error from bank for over $9,500, and more attacks, while impressing with fake charges to divert and impede life and marriage with false claims of wrong about readability.
I say , post it on their graves if they know nothing better to do, so they know the Tasmanian Devil made them do it and it wasnât their fault because they could do no wrong, and if they did it would be too late for them to be forgivable it abuse they sought to divert from as legal action.
Itâs a good thing that I worked in a mental hospital to know that none of their alienating and gaslighting attacks will ever be of any use to my wife and potential son.
None of their alienating can be good to my wife & potential son.
Theyâve always been the same evil towards me & them before.
Theyâre also suggesting that I abuse my wife and offspringâs intellectual property from the US Army medical department who currently have command since November 1993, after the robbery of my information systemâs inventory programâs and Electronic Data Transaction System, as they tried to set up discrimination systems such as :
KYC - FinCrime Protection - EY Canada
Trusted by the worldâs top financial institutions for Know Your Customer (KYC) solutions. Visit EY Canada to learn more about financial crime protection in Canada. Due Diligence.
To target victim and make them seem criminal by forging evidence against while seeking jury support to do so against them.
Nothing I also would have the right to be subjecting my son or wife to be subjected to, either from this forums, sub-forum or associated governments, against the army, while seeking to justify to make me hide their attacks against information systems with communication gaps from questioning and trying to divert communication on tangents by making false insinuation about values of meaning while they are actually the ones sympathetic with crimes they seek to be misleading others into.
To to mention kidnapping attempts and other abuse against my mother, father, sister, brother-in-law, one of my cousin from organized crime causing her a 9 months coma which costed $50,000 to bring her back to life for around 2 years, another who died of a brain tumor around 2008 after my mother died, and so on.
They also pay fines to other from the largest fine in history from a tobacco industry case from which more than 3 of my close relatives died, and, which they refuse to pay us for as well.
This, as we were attacking during the 9-11, while one of my uncle,
the husband of my maternal grand-fatherâs sister,
was a ### Court Martial Appeal Court of Canada judge for 10 years from around 1993 to 2003 or so, until he was 75 years old,
after which he retired from the military judge job,
after which he was appointed as Deputy judge of the federal court of first instance,
after being a consultant to the Queen for prosecuting,
as Queenâs counselâŠ
So yes, none of your diversion, comments and good will are of any use to me of my family or my country or those I have a duty to God to care for.
Also how they tried to make me seem crazy and abuse my familyâs well being
from their medical systems malpractice in acts of war against the military medical department.
Tryuniog to diminish their liability with false claims of the lack of knowledge they seek to justify,
deliberately so,
as they themselves admitted seeking forfeiture of evidence due to misrepresentation of communication they intend to perpetrate against my family and son as they do to me, and try to hide other previous attempts to team up against me in acts of war and trying to be alienating to us.
It really is, for the point I mentioned, which was the point in discussion, which had nothing to do with the points you drug out of left field later.
What point is that? Your nonsensical (apparent) belief that the gold standard was any less of faith in fiat currency than the current system? Your absurd claim that the 1929 crash wouldnât have happened if we had âfaithâ? Or merely your hilariously ignorant claim that the US dollar is a bubble on par with bitcoin?