The point made in the part I quoted. Not the things you keep dragging in from outside of it. A mentally handicapped child could follow. Whatâs your excuse?
You quoted my comment about bitcoin being a bubble (indisputable fact) and replied with the nonsensical claim that the US dollar is âpeas in a podâ with the bitcoin bubble. Can you please assemble this into something that isnât a profoundly stupid argument? Because no sane person with any understanding of the market could argue the literal words you said.
It also said fanboys. My point about faith was directed there.
I didnât see your excuse for not being able to keep up with a mentally handicapped child.
Which is also a nonsensical claim to make. The value of the US dollar is not driven by blind adoration from fanboys, bitcoin is. To claim that they are âpeas in a podâ requires a spectacular level of ignorance about economics.
Both are, and neither 100 percent.
Like I said, spectacular level of ignorance about economics.
The only thing spectacular here is your obsession with me. I donât even lean that way. Get a new crush.
I find this odd to believe that some of you guys would attack my wife or kid like that,
and try to steal their intellectual property they would get from me,
and try to make them crazy by misrepresenting me as crazy
and with mental problems and commit other acts of psychological warfare against me and obligating us to get expensive medical services elsewhere due to abuse from you and intent to make them paranoid and all kinds of other attacks against their rights like that,
while trying to get away with designing laws to be misinterpreted in courts, so as to try to justify forfeiture of their rights,
and trying to interfere against their freedom of movement,
and then, start pandemic to try to justify it by diverting with generalization about everyone else, to try to confuse with change of focus about the attacks targeted against them,
as confirmed from the Military police from NATO who also work with the UN, and the Air Force using electronic warfare and information systems with navigational systems from aerial navigation which job is not allowing new recruits for it anymore,
due to navigation from modems which were too fast for military intelligence to secure systems before the 9-11 after 1990.
â
Like if itâs not some kind of war to encrypt data against that security and other service offered to serve all humanity in competition to justify discrediting and then, hoping the discrediting and sought justification of the discrediting will not be held against them because itâs ok for them for steal and try to steal from my family and my wife and my future son, with all other delays and military diversion, while trying to make it seem like a danger to divert from sought forfeiture while trying to justify communication gap as if it was not use as part of the encryption for Bitcoins and other investments in electronic warfare.
Iâm actually in favor of more regulation. Iâm not sure where this comes from that all people in crypto see the state as the enemy. Iâm not a libertarian or anything like it. I just see crypto for what it potentially can be, the future base layer of the global financial system, as it basically augments the internet with an âownershipâ feature.
1 Like
Keep it civil please. This discussion has been overall pretty levelheaded and it would be nice to keep it that way.
Longer this thread will be visible, longer will be people exposed to good practice of selling when its high, contrary to bad practice of buying when high, and then selling low.
If they would have listened to you they would have sold pretty low
And exit happy like Newton, back before he reentered when higher and selling a lot lower.
And if someone will sell now, when this thread is still active and prices are high, good!
Everything you think is NONSENSE, a big corporation is investing billions to deal with the non-sense. You clearly dont think fees are a big deal, meaning you probably donât even get the concept and primary use of the blockchain. smh
Iâm aware BTC offers fees, i very clearly states the differences with fees so iâm not sure where you think iâm confused. Thatâs what the uneducated and scared always say when they canât figure out the blockchain or anything âUTTER NONSENSE, my opinion over major corps already investing billions and trillions into the system is betterâ. INVEST IN MY COMMENTS WITH NO FINANCIAL GAINS TO BACK THEM UP⌠Smart eh??
You just said the SECs approval is meaningless, this conversation is officially uneducated and i canât even reply after this. You really need to watch the news, do research and stop hating on an opportunity you lost smh and canât figure out.
Sounds pretty silly. Nonetheless i see how i clearly offended some people lmao. Once again, if itâs all nonsense, get our your team, and checkbook and tell trillion dollar investors WHY bitcoin and the blockchain is uttern nonsense. It sounds like your just scared to move on, and to eaches own respectably.
Good point with the virus and such Kelly but AGAIN, these are ALL issues being worked on and developed for the blockchain. You guys do know what development is right�? The major difference is still personal responsibility, not everyone wants to be responsible for themselves (clearly) but majority do.
News flash people, you canât regulate Bitcoin. No government can. They can only tax it. I BEG please do some research on the BLOCKCHAIN not just what Bitcoin is Bitcoin is a concept more than anything at this point that is clearly successfull.
Iâm going to listen to investors with trillions in, not the uneducated confused and scared of the future.
2 Likes
In reality, it would be nice to give citizens the OPTION to bank crypto or institutions.
1 Like
lol what? I really need to know your finances before i can even take your comments serious? I own 2 business and the future is screaming crypto. Sorry if your against it and donât even fully understand it. I mean for christ sakes you said it doesnât matter if the SEC approves. Means you havent paid attention to â â â â over the past 5 years.
Again not trying to argue but want to reassure the average person they should do research before hating on something they donât even know enough aboutâŚ
Your not even providing PROOF of anything to go against my statements. Where are the trillons being drained from the economy because of crypto? What is the overwhelming number of morons unwilling to move on and learn the future? There is no overwhelming number of people like you thatâs the issue from your side. The world is moving on developing a new financial strucure and your sitting here like âNo my bank is god we need to keep our old ways, innovatios sucksâ.
My proof, you can look on coinmarketcap.com and see how much money is going into the blockchain. Iâll believe 45% of world funds instead of someone whining about nothing, the numbers are clear donât be scared to move on lol.
YOu canât hate on the millionares and try to discredit the system because they took advantage and are still contributing to a system you canât even wrap your head around lol
Are the numbers lying? Is Chase bank wrong? Moneygram wrong? I guess this must all be a hoax and nonsense. lol with the rest of the world, some of who are millionaires now. Sorry you missed that train.
With that said, i canât even entertain this trash. Iâm going to keep investing, making bank and highly recommend others do the same. Do your DUE DILIGENCE BEFORE THINKING ABOUT anything involving Bitcoin, but also donât listen to the ones who are scared to move on, listen to where the money is actually going and what huge corps are doing.
2 Likes
If it can be profitable, they will adopt it with all ramifications, as the tool it is. With all future consequences of course.
A high risk associated with it would make it just another option given to clients.
I think the govs would then react when its too late.
Thatâs exactly what is going on. Adoption is being prepped these past 5 years. Meaning improved security, everything complained about above is already FAR into the works.
I agree with the above. Stocks are a high risk and an OPTION for citizens, hopefully we get to that point. Apparently only when the government says âok its officialâ is when people can take something serious now i guess.
Governments are already reacting with creating their OWN cryptocurrency to compete, that already speaks volumes. As long with setting up tax settings for the blockchain.
1 Like
(+) Trying to use
length of message
as ground to refuse
information related
(+) diversion about and with
lack of accuracy & details
for encryption.
â
Also note that (+) does not denote a negative plus (+) sign ,
as this expression used at the beginning of a line is only used to
denote an exact simple Plus (+) sign,
which is either used as an addition statement not
formatted in a bullet point format of expression,
for a statement written on the line,
and,
that it can also serve as an expression for an , and , conjunction,
or, as, AdditionallyâŚ
â
Additionally, in business,
the expression (#number) can be used to denote a negative number,
which, in this case, it is not.
â
Also, taking positive out of context, by coercing it into a negative does just that, and this electronic system also makes it easier to prove how it is done, by who, and who pays to administer it, and how they do it, and with who, when and also how.
You can also deduce what their goal is, how they hide their intentions,
why they want to hide their intentions and use it to create secrets from it, and use it as a secret, which secret they try to get benefit from,
such as those created, used, and, that profit is sought to be gained from, by safeguarding it and by safeguarding them.
â
Maybe you want to give more details about what you mean by
ânonsensical claimâ and how it is used to coerce facts and scientific facts from the same source into the same
ânonsensical claimâ you like to use to execute those coercions of facts and variables related to those facts in those reports.
By the way, while theyâre at it,
maybe you also want to add more accurate details about the mental conditions of the parties involved and referred to,
you also seem to mix up due to the sheer numbers of patients in your facilities in relations to your own statements from your own reports and your own systems.
â
Not to say utilities that is, because you will see what I mean by utilities later.
Itâs apparently against Interpol to try to abuse my family with such alienating,
and,
I also donât have the right to do that to them,
as it would be abuse against them to do so,
and it would also be ground for divorce due to the fact that I would be failing to provide them with the necessities of life for good mental health,
due to your attacks against their mental health.
Just because you try to, or, legal systems try to justify behavior which is insane and alienating doesnât mean that I do have the right to be associating with them,
as some may suggest.
Itâs still against treaties, and still forfeits international rights conferred by respecting the mentality of the opinions involved.
Even more so when they are against me and the health of my family,
and seek to try to hold me responsible of wrong when providing them.
You donât all have the military mental health required and benefit from the same mental health system, yet.
â
One more reason the (+) is not a Negative Plus sign,
is because that when it is used at the first digit of a line,
that it transposes the code for the + into a Bullet Point with indentation,
which is used to convey a Bullet Point List, instead.
That way, by putting the + sign into (parenthesis),
it doesnât load the Indented Bullet Point List format into the line from the start, and still manages to convey the positive value of the plus sign,
instead of negatively transferring it into a Bullet Point Indented List format.
It can also help to add the proper descriptive related information,
which, when those taking positive into a negative context,
either by being too pessimistic against positivity and good hope,
in other words,
to let false and bad hope prevail as a right to be against good hope,
well,
that bad hope does prevail and can lead all those supporting it you know where,
and where those same guys supporting it will later find out,
which, when they will find out,
will also have been their choice and diplomatic voting decisions to do so.