It’s not entirely my business, and I certainly shouldn’t be weighing in on matters concerning someone I’ve heard described as the Queen of Pochven so I apologize in advance for the rude intrusion here, but I do have a question. The mouthpiece who claims to speak with consent is calling the empires a rotten, corrupt force of stasis that impedes human potential. This opposition seems pretty integral to the whole thing.
You’re asking people to not interpret your words as support of this idea, but if I understand correctly, your actions already involved standing alongside and supporting the forces imposing that same idea? Or do I not understand correctly? I suppose I’m just a little unclear how this separation is defined for you, and also, why you feel it important to make a statement like that in the first place.