In EVE it does create money, that is how money is created. And IRL, people translate time and electricity into bitcoin. As for customer and/or taxes, those do not create money either.
Not necessarily. The money supply must grow (assuming you don’t want deflation, which when large enough can be Bad™). Under a tax and transfer system it does not grow, and in fact, taxes impose a dead weight loss on the economy–i.e. there are transactions that would take place but do not due to the taxes–that is taxes make the economy, in effect, “smaller”.
Not quite. Suppose I want to start a bank. Well call it Teckos’ First Bank of New Eden (and set aside the whole “It’s a scam thing”). Suppose I raise 500 million ISK in capital from shareholders and 500 million ISK in deposits and CCP (the government) says, “Teckos you need to hold 10% in reserves.” That means I have to hold 100 million in reserve. That means I can loan out 900 million. Notice that in doing so…no money is created.
Try this podcast while you are commuting or the like,
Add up daily production.
This is neither here-nor-there when it comes to net production and the money supply, really. If net production is less than or equal to than the growth rate of the money supply then we see mild deflation. If the money supply is growing faster we see inflation. Hyperinflation is a bit different in that it represents a breakdown in terms of trust in the government and the money supply. It isn’t just really bad inflation, it is something more than that.
So what? Seriously if a new player is setting his sights on earning a PLEX to “play for free” he needs to go get an introductory econ text and look opportunity cost. If somebody can earn the cost of a sub in an hour or two, then do that and spend the rest of that time in game doing fun things vs. horrible grinding. And if possible, spend a few more hours working and buy a sub for a whole year and get a big fat discount.
No you innumerate, I showed you the growth rates. They are lower now than in the past. Further, what we are really concerned about is the growth rate in the real economy vs. the growth rate in the money supply. If the latter out strips the former then we get inflation, if not we get deflation, in the rare case where they are equal the prices stabilize…all other factors held constant.
Yes, you nimrod, and look, during 2016 and 2017 there are flat parts in those graphs, whereas in previous years there were not or if there were they were of much shorter duration.
So? That happens every month.
And I’ll notice you completely ignore all the graphs for inflation. Do we see inflation graphs similar to the money supply graph? No. Not in the least. In fact if you were to regress inflation on the money supply you’d probably get a shitty fit.
There is no evidence here. None.