The reason you just pointed out, if you remove local then nuets and others who need Intel just as much to survive in hostile territory would lose out, corps and alliance have their channels, if local goes it could effect those who visit null.
1 Like
Like I said, why the hell do you care about the economy? Why should I? The only thing that ever inflates is PLEX anyway. CCP are just scared that people will buy less plex, itâs none of your concern.
1 Like
I donât personally and neither have others that mentioned the effect on the economy. It would be irrelevant anyway, since the only opinion that is important is CCPâs and theyâve made their position clear.
So you can be an angry little man all you like. Nothing is going to change.
If Iâm in an escalation with a 1.5b isk rattlesnake⌠not immediately. I d-scan like crazy to see if theyâre scanning me down and coming to the first gate of the site⌠but I donât run at the site of a red in system.
Without local, I probably wonât run DED sites anymore. I certainly wonât TRAVEL to them. And the biggest loss I have on this toon was exactly that⌠traveling home after running a DED site through a bit of space with no intel. (losing one of those 1.5b isk rattlesnakes)
That kill doesnât happen without local in null⌠because I wouldnât travel to run that site.
Hunters WANT those kills. Those kills likely donât happen without local (or happen less frequently).
When Iâm mining I bait. Heck, the only reason I mine is a chance to bait.
1 Like
So what are you mentioning it for then. If you donât care about the economy then why do you care if players carrier rat?
Youâre right, including local so give up the ridiculous dream.
1 Like
Itâs not my dream. Maybe you have confused some people here.
It is otherwise you wouldnât even be in this thread.
Great logic. So youâre in this thread, so it must be your dream too then?
I thought it was pretty clear I was on the opposing side of the argument. Are you going to admit you want local removed now or carry on this sham that you donât care about anything being discussed in this thread yet are still here arguing.
I was pretty clear about 1000 posts ago. But if you are going to claim that being in this thread means death to local, then you canât remove yourself from that group.
Alternatively, accept that itâs also possible other people donât want local removed either.
Calm down little man. Iâm not arguing with you.
You asked a question. I answered and then youâve been ranting since. Thats nothing to do with me. Go look in the mirror to see the problem.
A question I asked a month ago or something and I didnât even ask you. You didnât even answer the question I asked anyway idiot.
Does the date you ask a question matter to when you receive an answer? The thread was necroed, which often starts discussion again. Apologies for not waiting with baited breath to answer a question the moment you post one.
Yes I did.
You asked:
Define what destroying the economy means
To which I replied, he didnât need to, because CCP have stated their concerns several timesâŚ
Direct answer to the question asked.
Go again maybe? Perhaps youâll score next time.
Thatâs not an answer. I wanted to know WHAT HE THINKS. Thatâs why I asked HIM. NOT you.
I guess you should have put that in your question then. Your question was âDefine what destroying the economy meansâŚâ
Doesnât seem to preclude anyone from answering, which thankfully is what forums are about.
One more time maybe?
Thatâs why I used the reply button. Give up.
Get a life.
Thatâs a rather disappointing comeback. Iâm sure you can do better.
This is a joke and not in no way able to curb the massive ISK generation by capitals. Instead of this useless politicking, they should do some profound work on anoms to make it harder for capitals, supers in particular, to farm them, without hurting other forms of ISK generation. I have suggested one way, but CCP is not competent enough to do anything about it except for blanket bombardment of the issue. CCP also was so wise to remove a very big ISK sink: market fees without doing adjustments to faucets at the same time. Typical case of failing âleave them with fun toys for a while, we adjust laterâ.
And before you think that no local changes anything: Consider this:
While several dozens of thousand of players generated 60T ISK in Null sec, a couple of hundred generated 11T in W-space. No local is not going to solve the issue of too much ISK being generated.
Furthermore: I donât know if you (general you, not personal you) have noticed but since CCP started interfering with ISK generation, ISK generation has become erratic and gone out of control. Before it was a steady but slow gain, now itâs a rollercoaster with huge spikes and minor dips. Whatever CCP does, it is only making the ISK generation go wilder.
2 Likes
I agree. Players will always find a way to push the boundary and a lot of the issue seems to come down to game designers not really understanding how the game is played.
2 Likes