Absolutely. Even though I have an understanding of game design in general and EVE in particular that vastly exceeds yours, on top of a much better understanding of the world in general*, there is nothing I could possibly do to salvage the utter garbage that you posted.
*See your raving lunacy on bitcoin, covid vaccines, etc.
Please do post more about your “idea” so we can mock its stupidity. Or just continue whining about how unfair it is that people are criticizing you, surely that will accomplish all of your goals.
PS: if you don’t want to be criticized you can always leave this forum. Nobody is forcing you to put your ideas out there for comment.
His “idea” is so asinine, that I’m starting to wonder if this whole thing is an elaborate false-flag op of some sort to discredit carebears.
I mean turning half of null into more high-sec is just about up there with ideas like “charging gankers’ credit cards for PLEX and transferring it to their victims” that we see every once in a while from some first-poster who thinks he’s “figured out how to fix the game.”
I think Renly would be a lot happier on the test server. He can just mine in peace, nobody will mess with him, he can bling out his ship anyway he wants, and basically experience the game exactly as he wants with no space bully griefer gankers.
And CCP would grief him every time they shut down or reset the test server for testing purposes. Plus, can you imagine how griefed he’d be if someone killed him on the test server and CCP didn’t immediately respond to his forum post demanding bans and reimbursement?
Damn dude, such jealousy! I promise I won’t use them again if you feel so strongly about it.
I got five bucks on it having some kind of “battlegrounds” feature to graciously replace the destruction that will be lost with the implementation of a module that allows you to prevent being targeted by other players.