I think you are looking at this from the wrong perspective, the risk is there in maintaining your space, and ratting in HS in a VNI is what? You do missions in a BS, level 4 missions, I use two Palantines to run missions in hisec.
My objectivity in terms of this issue is that I think that hunting needs to be a challenge.
No, it isnt.
You want NS Local intel to match HS, so you can rat under that for greater profit.
You arent about hunters. You are about your own ratting safety.
I believe that a person ratting should be damn difficult to catch unless he makes an error or is un-attentive and that applies to people solo ratting in a system, which is my base line for EVE in nullsec, period. That is it, you can get emotive by all means but this comes from me being both a ratter and a hunter…
I dont.
Your precept is the target has to “fk up” to be caught.
That is not what PvP is about.
Not fking up is not a requirement for PvP.
TLDR:
You want to rat in Player NS, with HS Local intel, to earn more, safer.
Risk vs Reward if you want to get them juicy isk from null you need to put your self in harms way, the more dangerous the less people do it and the more juicy the iskies become. If its only dangerous when you ■■■■ up then its technically safe, such as incursions and has no place in nullsec.
And yet many people die in nullsec in the current system, by people making the extra effort to have tackle ahead of their fleet, using WH’s logging off etc. I have a very good ability to keep my attention on what is going on, so I have not lost many ships while ratting. But a lot of people do…
Nullsec is an empire part of the game, I lose a number of ships doing PvP to defend our space. I rather like the get back to Fort or keep, then re-ship into PvP ship and go kick ass, my Vaga has 13 killmarks on it. Safer am I?
This is horseshit.
You just want to rat in Player NS, with HS level Local intel, to earn more.
Thats all there is to it.
Admit it.
ahhhh ok … its all about bot hunting … i get you but i dont belive you
it a lazy way to get more content for the killboard … make more loot … make more isk … go to WHs then … no local there …
sorry
JuuR
My opinion is that hunting needs to be tough for correct game balance, based on a solo player ratting in a system in nullsec.
What is HS level local intel? Don’t forget that in nullsec you have to make your own security, I do have a killboard with lots of kills on it and a number of losses, and a fair number are small gang stuff like home defense quick reaction fleets. I have to support fitting up dreads and carriers. It is pretty relative.
He knows as much about NS than he does about HS or basic game mechanics tbh
Makes me wonder if he ever even played the game 
Because local is literally the only difference between nullsec and wormholes, right?
vs
You want NS profits, with HS Local intel.
Thats fine, but dont try to sugar coat it.
Its automatic, instant free Local intel, as in HS.
Is this somehow new to you?
It is local pure and simple, the only distinction currently in the game is that between WH space and the rest of space. So I had no idea what point you were trying to make with that name…
The context is that my objective is that a solo player at the base can use local to manage his risk, with a delay it does not work. I believe that the hunting of others in this game should be a challenge and suggest that the current basis is fine. If you put a delay it will help only lazy or less able players.
Nullsec rewards are to pay for the ships and fittings to defend your space, the risk is that you lose a lot of ships defending your space. It is you who started going off on nullsec rewards against HS rewards, and I merely explained what the risk of living in nullsec is and why rewards are higher.
@Dracvlad
Yeah, we get it.
You want to rat in NS, with HS equivalent Local intel, for NS rewards.
Can you stop posting the same reply over and over again?
We get it, you don’t like people
But that doesn’t give you the right to spam the same gibberish all the time
Act like your age lol
It is a silly statement, there is no difference between HS local and nullsec local and nor should there be, the balance of the game is currently correct in terms of local.
Nullsec in itself is richer space as there is more risk based on people roaming into your space and people wanting to kick you out. Bubbles are an increased risk so you end up losing a pod, increased risk for example.
And people catch others as the game is now.
@Dracvlad
What part of the assessment below is untrue?
You want to rat in NS. Yes.
You want to do so with HS equivalent Local intel. Yes.
You want the NS rewards. Yes.
Are all three of the above not true?
True.
True
There is no difference at the moment unless you are applying that to your suggested time difference in terms of delay. Hisec in terms of this debate is irrelevant, because my entire point is that nullsec balance is correct in terms of the parameters that I used, which is a solo player relying on local to get safe, and that the hunters have a difficult job. One merely has to look at the killboards to see many people dying in nullsec with local as it is.
So false.
Do you want NS Local intel to remain the same as HS Local intel?
I want local to stay as it currently is because I think the balance is correct.