@Rivr_Luzade where you at? I got the popcorn ready
You think the fact that Brics was going to sue CCP in real life affected their decision? Maybe they felt some kind of pressure? Why would they ban first and then review their actions taken? Just a speculation.
1 Like
To the people who are complaining about âbut you need to review all the bans you have done beforeâ etc etc etc
These reviews should be taking place before the ban ever gets put in place.
Initial Investigation
Found Guilty
Review Evidence and Investigation steps to confirm guilt
Ban
Its like going from Test environments to Prod without UAT or proper testing taking place. It always blows up spectacularly.
7 Likes
I totally agree with you that how you do it in real life you donât public blacking someone name then say sorry we mess up we so sorry ccp needs to be ashamed of themselves
2 Likes
Well that was a wild ride.
4 Likes
I really feel bad for all involved.
(SNARK) I think free skill points would make everyone feel a little better about this unfortunate moment. (/SNARK) 
1 Like
inb4 the three people banned over this incident get compensated by CCP with 25K unallocated SPs each 
3 Likes
it was there intentinally. since CCPâs head so confused they might be dont understand which thread i am replying. anyways i deleted it.
1 Like
So now we have established that CCP makes mistakes.
We should think long and hard about how we can use this information moving forward.
2 Likes
Weaponize all the thing!
2 Likes
@The_Judge as the only member of the CSM to come out in support of the original ban publicly, any follow up to this previous statement of yours?
https://forums.eveonline.com/t/brisc-rubal-removed-from-the-csm-13/151333/35
18 Likes
Agree. There should be consequences for the players who made the false report and the employees who bungled this so badly. To write a dev blog calling someone out like that is disgusting. Since when do we name and shame?
Even if it were true, they should have written something like âCSM member removed for administrative reasonsâ and left it there.
5 Likes
Congratulations!
Youâve just lost the trust of the rest of the community. You told us youâd done your investigation and had determined they were dirty cheaters. Now youâre saying you didnât do any sort of investigation until after you took action and made a pretty serious statement.
How can we possibly trust anything you do from this point forward? Did other CSMâs actually turn in evidence, or was this just a ploy to get EvE in the news again?
7 Likes
Haha, itâs gone great.
https://forums.eveonline.com/t/brisc-rubal-removed-from-the-csm-13/151333/35
6 Likes
Get used to the âpost CCP Guardâ community team. Guard was a good natured, tempering force at CCP as far as I have seen and heard, not so much for others that are in charge.
7 Likes
Thatâs unfortunate that he is a casualty of some trigger-happy mouthbreather (referring to âwhistleblowerâ here). That guy had his heart in the right place.
3 Likes
excuse me guiz, i need to go hug my therapy dog, mr snuggles knows how to comfort me at times like dis.
2 Likes
Absolutely spineless. Even in Iceland, special people get special treatment I guess.
Or are you going to do 2 week long reviews for everyone else you banned who claimed innocence?
3 Likes
Delve, 1DQ1-A. Doing what INIT is not capable of: creating content.
1 Like
I would like to know which CCP employee thought it was a good idea to write such an undiplomatic, damaging statement which essentially attacked the character of an innocent Eve player.
I feel like in the days of CCP Guard this wouldnât have happened, even if he wasnât technically in charge of the team, his opinions carried weight. He is the kind of guy that doesnât need to flex his internet muscle to feel powerful. Someone else on the community team is obviously very different.
4 Likes