Lesson learned:
-
Receive information
-
Investigate information
-
Act on investigation
-
Assess actions to see if intended result was accomplished
-
Ammend or Sustain Actions after assessment.
There is your policy moving forward. your welcome
3 Likes
Lesson learned Brisc is not from third grade Europe country, he is from US and you can not â â â â with him 
:
Sigh, while I am pleased to see this resolved and admitting to be wrong, but god damn it, I hoped you were not wrong and making mistakes on this one, CCP. This is a very costly mistakes, especially on a public figure (TBH, not that I really care about this particular part, but the whole situation). I sense strong unforeseen ramifications in-bound.
3 Likes
It was a â â â â move to act prior to even verifying wrongdoing. It was another â â â â move to stonewall everyone when asked if they even had evidence. The first right thing theyâve done is own this and apologize. Weâll see what else comes from it.
2 Likes
Backstory probably this:
A CSM member heard a rumor and discussed it with other CSM members who all then came up with the wrong conclusion and in order to earn CCPâs favor or to keep themselves from being implicated as complicit, decided to inform CCP who then acted first by publicly crucifying a well known CSM member without first confirming the validity of the information they received.
1 Like
Not necessary, though limiting what information you share with them is probably a good thing
HOWEVER I am in favor of temp banning all involved, as a warning.
1 Like
You mean the GSM?
1 Like
Just think of the sheer amount of silly CCP could have spared themselves by actually talking to Brisc before making any decission.
Finesse. It helps to keep things civil and save face. Specially if youâre supposed to be a professional acting professional.
Anyway, Ishtanchuk sends her regards:
5 Likes
R.I.P. CCPâs Credibility on bans
4 Likes
So we can be confident in all past and future bans then as you do not follow due process and ensure there is evidence before just waving the ban-hammer based on rumour and supposition?
And the CSM acted responsibly throughout despite the CSM being your source for the ban in the first place?
O.K.
This is basically CCP right about nowâŚ
6 Likes
Okay, so further investigation provides no evidence of wrongdoing by Brisc or the other two folk.
What about the CSM member(s) who reported this to CCP? That seems to take the meta a bit too far in my book. Or, did I miss something?
6 Likes
I think your assessment is a bit generous. Perhaps some CSM members took the meta a bit too far in order to get rid of a rival.
Itâs been done before âŚ
3 Likes
Yeah, I was giving them the benefit of a doubt.
1 Like
Not the first and last person that was banned and did not deserved it.
With compensations for my losses, do not hurry up. Ticket number 887493 .
Does it look like a playerâs concern?
Now that this action proved wrong, will they review the 10,000s that have been banned or does this only go for CSMs?
1 Like
I have to wonder, if it were any other regular Joe Jerk Off - would they have even took a minute to review the ban hammerâŚ
We all would have been forgotten within five minutes.
The 1% win againâŚ
1 Like
CCP doesnât âName & Shameâ other players that are banned.
I would say that anyone elected to a representative position should be held to a much higher standard.
The point still remains - they wouldnât have gave a â â â â (in regards to reviewing the judgement) if it werenât a âhigh profileâ person in real life.
1 Like