Did CCP secretly nerf Emerging Conduit as of today?

Disagree. The kind of people that leave because zero-effort farming gets nerfed and they have to move to space where they interact with other players are not people who belong in EVE. They add nothing to the game, and TBH the smart PvE players would love to receive the major income buff that would come from these people (and their loot) disappearing from the market.

Source: the CCP representative explicitly saying “farming ISK from these sites was too much”. Do you also want a source that 1+1=2?

And now, by your own rules, you have lost the argument and need to quit. You insulted people, that means you have no argument but insults.

Or does this rule you’ve invented only apply to other people?

I’m taking ‘minmaxing’ and the reference to numbers to mean unexpectedly high rewards. Notice the ‘AND’ after bots.

Like people are pointing out, if it was just bots that were the issue it would be handled differently.

1 Like

was not explicitly talking about isk.
Your source is invalid.

Exactly, I answered to the insults by insults, because an insult does not need to be argumented against.
This was not an argument to start with. But I gues you don’t know the difference between arguing and insulting… Well you can go fck yourself.

The rewards were fixed by CCP. I guess you mean, unexpected high completion rate. But what was exactly said is

And there is no notion of isk/h in that quote. Not that you can’t be right, but just because you can understand it this way, does not mean you are right.

Are you affirming that the isk/h in L4 distribution is also “disproportionate” ? AFAIK only alpha bots were the issue, and that’s the reason why alphas were removed L4s.

So, by your own rule, all you have is insults and you lose.

lose what ?

Everything. You have no argument, only insults. Stop posting.

So I lose nothing ? Thank you for your stupid post.

But you know what, you would just stop posting stupidity and I would stop answering to those. But that would require a brain.

Yeah, no brain no pain I see.

context. Learn what it means.

Look, kid : THAT is a retard cry baby.

You sure like to cry a lot.

Also a hypocrite, don’t forget that.

You sure like to cry a lot.

Exactly.

The rewards of level 4’s weren’t the problem and weren’t changed.

Consumption rate and isk/hour are part of the same thing. Or, what do you think was the problem beyond bots?

Yes, and you are also a hypocrite. Now please go away, the adults are trying to have a discussion here.

I don’t know.

But just because I don’t know, does not mean that any explanation is correct.

You sure like to cry a lot.

We get it, and you’re also a hypocrite. Stop spamming us about it.

Could be said about anything.

You’re just sticking your head in the sand now…

Also:

“The numbers that we started to see in that period became cause for great concern and a decision was made to space out their respawn timer more and tweak the survey database drop rate.”

CCP: “the numbers were concerning”.

CCP: nerfs reward ISK/hour.

Hypocrite: “LOLOLOL BUT WE DONT KNOW WHY THEY DID IT LOLOLOLOL”.

1 Like

That’s called being cautions. It’s the basis of any serious research or reasoning.
When you don’t know, you don’t know. Claiming otherwise is stupid, and only makes an idiot of you. That’s why you are spoutting so much BS : you are not used to acknowledge your own ignorance.

It’s not caution to deny everything that doesn’t suit your narrative. It’s willful ignorance.

I’d be more inclined to believe you were being cautious if you could offer an alternative explanation that makes some sense.

If not, I’m going to Occam Razor it.