High Sec Candidate

[Dracvlad]

@Knowledgeminer

Man, not long ago it was only miner gankers that I was good at hunting, now it’s only Tornado and Vexor gankers, but miner gankers are no longer in the list… Don’t you think providing the list of things I’m not effective at would be easier? If anything, the list would surely be shorter, or wouldn’t it?

Tornado, Vexor, gankers and of course those that gank miners. You are relentless and very very good at it.

@Knowledgeminer

And what blind spot would that be? Be more precise please, say what it is exactly that I don’t know about AG or wouldn’t know how to do right if I had the opportunity to.

Because even though this thread isn’t about me and I definitely expect it doesn’t become about me, your blanket statement makes it look as if I could be missing something about this suicide ganking / anti-ganking thing that might invalidate anything I said in some other post…

That is my opinion in a specific area, but as you don’t partake in that area you would only know if you got involved in it. I am not going to tell you as it is better that you found out yourself.

@Knowledgeminer

Could it be that you didn’t really read what I said to begin with?

I just found that part funny because when you start talking about people sitting AFK in hisec and making a point that someone would not do that in lowsec and I saw someone sit AFK in lowsec for the sixty minutes I was there and not die. I just found it rather amusing to say that. Dark humour I know, but…,

As for your PS, what you wrote above that made sense to me, but on the other hand you went into a feeling about what Lorelei meant by that statement, you took it literally and extrapolated something that she did not say.

You need to read this

@Knowledgeminer

not chance based (other than the chance based way in which weapons work already).

How on earth you extrapolated that she meant having a chance based mechanic is beyond me.

@Knowledgeminer

For those who care, yes, but so what? What does this have to do with pretending suicide ganking should have a guaranteed failure rate higher than 50%?

Lorelei did not suggest that, seriously?

@Knowledgeminer

Is this how you’re suggesting the guaranteed minimum 50% failure rate could be achieved? You realise that would have zero effect on 1-shot Tornado gankers, right?

Again, WTF. If you are going to attack someone for what they say makes sure it is what they say and not what you think they said.

I took from what Lorelei said is that she felt that it was too certain and the victim really has little chance to survive and that was a feeling. And chanting back that she wanted a chance based system was stupid and like a ganker troll.