It was already written. By some German guy you apparently dislike. The majority of experts on space propulsion seem to agree with him.
But hey, everyone is entitled to their superstitions. I don’t like to step on cracks. You believe in a magic perpetual motion device. It’s all good.
Exactly. There is no such thing as a free lunch, or free energy…
there is such a thing as more efficient and refined used of energy
especially in an age when we are forced to rethink our philosophy on energy wastage
Alright, you got me. Yes I created your universe. Then you ■■■■■■ it up so I went on a holiday in another one. So sue me.
You need to think more logically. Life evolved to fit conditions the environment happened to present. Also life and the sun / planets are the same thing, acting differently due to differences in contents and mass.
Unadulterated rubbish.
LOL.
The EMD has been debunked after being subject to the most strict tests ever in the most insulated environment ever. Turned out that the “impulse” was caused by the interaction between current in the feed wires and Earth’s magnetic field, since the “impulse” also happened when they disconnected the microwave generator and replaced it for a heatsink.
The EM drive is dead:
There in my original thread you have the University of Dresden paper about the thing.
what
why would it need a heatsink
and what does that pdf prove
and who cares if it is was caused by the earths own magnetic field
it still generates thrust
so what i want to know is why people are so averse to the idea of science breaking the laws of known physics
like youre trying to say that lorentz force factors are the only reason it generated thrust and so its discredited
yet it still generates thrust without a propellant and youre not willing to test it in space
because you wanna cut down any idea that breaks your understanding of the theory of relativity
its funny because people want to cut down any idea that comes close to the realisation of ‘perpetual motion’
or ‘infinite energy’
yet our own panet has been orbiting our sun for 200 trillion years
without fail
and our planets core has been generating geothermic energy for almost as long
yet the idea of an effecient energy seems totally alien and unattainable
and for what reason
because you wanna suck the fossil fuels for cash
i guess
The “thrust” was the interaction between the live wires and Earth’s magnetic field. The ressonating chamber does nothing at all and bovisouly the contraption would produce zero thrust without Earth’s magnetic field.
Also “that pdf” is a scientific paper with the reserach and results of testing the EM drive and finding out it doesn’t works. You should read it and learn how does Science sound.
yet it was still thrust
what part of that dont you understand
Which means that it simply would not work in deep space absent an orbital bodies magnetic field in which to propel itself from…
I don’t even know where to start…
“Perpetual motion” and “infinite energy” have never been proven. Never. Ever.
Our planet is 4.5 bilion years old, and in that time, it’s been slowing down on its path around the Sun and becoming closer to it; the only reason why the planets won’t fall into the Sun it’s because the Sun will explode and destroy the solar system way, way before that.
Energy proficency is not related to infinite energy. Is releated to imporving the ratio between labor and entropy (striving to achieve more labor with less entropy).
Since the thrust is caused by Earth, this means that no Earth = no thrust. And in case you didn’t notice, there is a notorious lack of Earth out there in space.
feeble arguments from people who blindly refuse to accept that thrust without propellant is possible
you argue that its impossible by citing sources that show its possible
dont you see the fallacy in your own argument
ie
if thrust is generated on earth without propellant
then thrust without propellant is possible
your own argument works against you
whether its because of the earths own gravitational field is irrelevant
it still proves its possible
and even if its a result of the earths own gravity it doesnt matter
the whole exercise has proven one thing
motion without propellant is feasible
It’s using the Earth’s magnetic field as propellant, genius…
the earths magnetic field isnt a propellant genius
otherwise we wouldnt need fuel would we
A magnetic field isn’t a propellant? Then, by all means, tell me what railguns use for propellant. Don’t worry, I’ll wait…
gonna be waiting a while
The U.S. Navy already has prototype railguns where the projectile is fired by using, you guessed it, magnetic fields…