This is the best. Thank you so much.
4 Likes
Funny how history repeats itself.
Ccp announce dominion sov, and talked about how it would open up null to smaller groups and have small gang objectives (read: f goons). So dominion is implemented and the end result is that the âbig blocsâ got bigger and the small guys became rentersâŚ
Well here we have people thinking turning off local is going to basically do what ccp promised with dominion.
It wont.
In fact if history is a guide, it means EVEN MORE groups will clump together in an effort to spread the defensive umbrellas out even further to cover the new gaps removing local will create.
I always found it funny how people were celebrating dominion because they didnt understand the epic screwing it was about to deliver to them, even those outside null.
Yep, history repeating itselfâŚ
7 Likes
I approve of this message!
I had the same thought.
I also wonder how many folks who are âunsubbing their 9 accountsâ actually are paying customers.
Yes plex comes from somewhere . . . .but did these specific people open their own wallets every month? I was under the impression any non scrub in null plexed their accounts with ease.
m
5 Likes
You could have people sitting on gates, patrolling systems, and mapping wormholes for your âintel.â Even then you shouldnât be 100% safe from anyone, ever. Nowhere is truly safe in EVE and nowhere should be truly safe. Not even Sov Null.
This I very much doubt. âIâm unsubbing my 12 rorq pilots!â
Really? Weâre expected to believe people pay real money to sub mining? I donât buy it, which fits nicely as neither do they.
1 Like
This isnât going to have the effect CCP thinks it will. Itâs going to be the opposite. This is going to make things that are already a problem an even bigger problem. This has the to potential to make the blue donut meme an actually reality. There have been a number of solutions floated that would help, having to do with citadel timers and asset safety. This is only going to make an already risk averse group way more risk averse.
1 Like
Not a good idea CCP . You have to make isk from ratting/mining to support wars and game play. The Big game ships are too expensive to shut down null like that were the isk is made.
On a different note i really believe you should diversify and allow more pve options to be able to fly big ships solo to make the game possible for those who dont enjoy being ruled over by corps. I get enough of that when i go to work⌠when im at home i want some peace sometimes do you understand that? Null is predictable to some level and this works for many i think for that reason.
2 Likes
Count me out alsoâŚ2 subs goneâŚCCP you are clueless. Enjoy the game huntersâŚuntil there is nothing left to hunt 
1 Like
Jeez, people need to stop crying and think about how to use it to your advantage. People are so used to current tactics and info gathering and instead of coming up with new ideas that work they resist change. Bunch of cry babies. Go figure it out, its part of the fun - adapt and overcome.
Also, multiple accounts are still useful. While you cannot see local you can still see the gate and what comes in. Whats the salt over? adapt and overcome - stop yer dang crying.
PvP can actually happen now and not at choke points in larger numbers.
Happy to keep all 9 of my accounts active.
3 Likes
It will kill the game.
It will be fun for first week - then it will kill your game.
I wouldnât play such stupid mechanic game.
1 Like
every player deserve respect just coz you donât like their option doesnât mean you have to be a prick!
2 Likes
Lowsec local should be delayed too, should be only highsec that is live.
Nah, keep lowsec live, there should be a risk gap and stages from one level to another, and we need the medium ground between high and null, especially with the local change, which as Iâve stated above, I approve.
3 Likes
Frankly I think this is b*******. Null sec is safe because we make it safe. Through years of dropping structures in the right locations. Organizing Fleets spur-of-the-moment. Having huge Intel networks using to track the enemy so that we know where they are. As soon as this happens Iâll be asking for my money back for all of my accounts for CCP. IF YOU DONT LIKE THIS YOU SHOULD ASK FOR YOUR MONEY BACK TOO! I didnât work so hard and train so long and pay so much money. To not be able to use the things that I like to play. CCP ty For not caring about us and or hard work!
4 Likes
It will end up like all MMOâs⌠Super rich, max SP charâs raping each other⌠no lowbies, (other than alts). Game then no fun for newbies⌠Shame reallyâŚ
3 Likes
Sounds like a regular Pearl Abyss title.
God forbid Null dwellers actually run the risk of losing access to their fancy toys when they go to war. Youâll get no sympathy from me on an appeal to a sense of safety. Youâve watched CODE enforce their own brand of threat across High Sec. Youâve seen gatecamps in Low Sec. Youâve (hopefully) been down a wormhole and know what itâs like living down there.
Every sector of the gameâs community have had their sense of safety buggered for years. The only thing Null dwellers have said in return is âHTFU.â Now itâs time for Null to harden the â â â â up.
6 Likes
I do wonder how many different reasons there are for playing this game. Personally i like space and most things about it. I dont mind paying for the virtual experience but⌠i find i cant fly the big ships without corp back up and then the corp rules your gaming experience. I wonder if the game was based on less violence/conflict that it would attract a different kind of player and expand the CCP horizons. If you need more revenue CCP is it worth looking for a different market more PG rated?
1 Like
You should play Black Desert, unlike eve right now it actually makes you feel like youâre accomplishing something.