Jesus wept.
This should be good. Please demonstrate how I misrepresented anything.
Ah, yes. Personal experience. The most unreliable form of evidence. You do understand why we actually ask for evidence and not personal testimony when we, for example, run scientific studies, right?
So, are you saying that bittervets are generally open to change but new players are not?
That response makes no sense to the question I’m asking. It’s a yes or no question.
Sure, so in other words your previous statement was wrong.
The evidence I asked for, isnt about whether the killboard was accurate, but regarding your claim about how you said new players were being targetted at a higher rate than other players.
You are really bad at following discussions, aren’t you.
Here is what I said:
but you are the one making the claim that New Players are being targetted more.
Please, feel free to provide the evidence for your claims.
What I’m asking you, is to provide evidence for your claim that new players are being targetted over older players. Not for your claim about zkillboard. We already concluded that your comment was false, regarding that.
Okay, so i took a look at Scipio Artellius’ post. He took a look at a single ganker. Whats your point? Do you want me to list up a graph for Jason Kusion, for example, and see how old his gank targets are? Scipio himself says that, and I quote:
The result can certainly be extrapolated out to many misleading conclusions, but just don’t do that.
And the only playstyle that would warrant someone moving all their belongings beyond simply a fitted ship, around new eden on a regular basis would be a nomadic individual. Which most new players will not be doing.
So your claim is based on baseless accusations. Gotcha.
Asking for evidence is not the same as “arbitrarily deciding that everything you say is wrong.” Infact, that’s not arbitrary at all. It’s actually quite reasonable.
Cool. So here is another claim by you that can be easily proved. If I post the last 15 of my responses to new citizens Q and A, and if over half of them are nonsense and are unrelated or do not help the new player in any way, what will you say to that?
Since Lucas Kell joined eve 6 years(2007) prior to Solonius Rex(2013), I have no idea where that extra 2 years is coming from.
But this is another perfectly easily provable claim. What is your alt that has more replies in new citizen Q and A than mine?
I’ve also been in many corps that had a minimum sp rule, and the reason for that wasn’t because they were afraid of new players coming in to AWOX them, it was because they had specific ships and doctrines that needed to be flown and new players had neither the skills nor the experience to fly them.
And even then, we did API checks to confirm their character. I think almost every competent, good corp used API to do a preliminary check of new recruits, wouldnt you agree?
Years ago, I pioneered this modern trend of point by point addressing each part of someone’s essay. I soon realized that this was a lot of work, and it was also ineffective as a means of communication.
I find that it’s better to address their statement as a whole, providing a succinct response which addresses the larger issue, rather than trying to debate each detail. For example, Lucas Kell is an idiot. With that single sentence, I have adequately addressed anything he might have said or will say in the future.
But surely there are some areas where his words are important?
Lol PvP trash is angry
It’s appropriate to quote once, even twice, but thrice is usually too much. When someone’s meaningless post interrupts a conversation, you can use a quote to get it back on track, as I have done here. Likewise, when someone says something particularly amusing or utterly stupid, you can quote it like so:
This highlights how foolish or absurd their comment is. For example, notice how the miner is continuing to use the yellow face, unsure of its symbolic value, but convinced that he is somehow gaining some kind of mystical edge in the debate he is imagining.
Lucas isn’t worth quoting at all, he’s already had his fifteen minutes of spam, and has been demoted to Dracvlad status.
Calm down bro, why so angry?
Your perception of anger is symptomatic of your larger personality issues. I suggest you speak with a therapist about the imaginary anger. I am no more angry at you, than I am at a dying tree that I have decided to cut down and remove from my high security zone. You are infected with bot aspirancy, and James teaches us to pity the miners.
Calm down, it is good to relax
Notice how the miner continues to engage in mimicry.
Notice how the miner continues to engage in mimicry.
Calm down bro, anger is bad for the health
At this point, the miner is doubling down on his mimicry, desperately trying to utilize the CODE for himself. He knows this is how it’s done, but yet for some reason he simply can’t harness the power. What is wrong? He is a goofus.
What’s mimicry
that makes no sense
Illiteracy is a common symptom of bot aspirancy.
Now the miner is attempting to communicate with hieroglyphics, reverting to his natural instincts. Here, the flower represents his hopes and aspirations, which he hopes to communicate symbolically. He wants to spread, growing big and strong, but he is a weed and must be weeded out.
Now the miner is attempting to communicate with hieroglyphics, reverting to his natural instincts.
You gotta flower the rock to get the flower
The miner fancies himself to be a big flower, growing despite the hard rock of the high security zone. He is proud of himself, although incompetent, because he has chosen to plant himself outside the main throughfare, in Audaerne. He is convinced that he will be allowed to spread. Unfortunately, he is already doomed, and will inevitably be crushed.