Freedom of speech is a concept that is required only by weaklings and dishonorable liars. It allows them to evade responsibility for the nonsence they’re saying. Freedom of speech lets people insult othes, but when they are getting insulted back, they’re whining that they were only ‘speaking up their opinion and you have no right attacking them for that’ and all other sort of crazy egoistic asocial behavior.
Here in the State above all else we value Honor, and three main component of Honor are Loyalty, Courage and Honesty. In regard to what you speak, it means:
- You must always stay loyal, both with your actions and words. Apparently, freedom of speech is against it, allowing you insult your betters.
- Have courage to face consequence and answer for what you say. Stand before tribunal, take punishment for offenses you committed with your speech, or challenge those who insult you, answer on challenges if you insulted someone on purpose, or bring apologies if something you said was just wrong and you didn’t mean it or made it by mistake, you shall never hide from what you did, would it be with word or deed. Apparently, coward adepts of freedom of speech would whine instead they had ‘right’ to say it and will run away from taking responsibility.
- Finally, you cannot be Honorable withou Honesty. You shall never lie, you shall prove your point of view and accept faults in your reasoning if someone proves you to be wrong, apologize for your mistake and lies that you didn’t plan to commit. On the other hand, dishonorable adepts of freedom of speech accept lie as their ‘right’, and when they cannot prove their point of view, they simply insult one who speaks it up or straightforward make up stuff - usually even not about the subject itself, but about speaker whom they disagree with.
As you can see, only the most disgraceful of speakers call for need of freedom of speech, and surely we need none of them in our glorious State.
Do you have any further questions about freedom of speech?