I didn’t, in fact. The bit you quote is from a wider discussion, about a “humanitarian disaster” emancipation would cause.
I am well aware, myself, that it is not fear of humanitarian consequences of emancipation that fuels the Amarr conquest.
I didn’t, in fact. The bit you quote is from a wider discussion, about a “humanitarian disaster” emancipation would cause.
I am well aware, myself, that it is not fear of humanitarian consequences of emancipation that fuels the Amarr conquest.
No…
I think off-topic thread has been officially killed!
No one wants to know th’ true answers t’ this question.
I’m curious!
My apologies, reading possible solutions to mass emancipation of all slaves I took as a suggestion of what we should do. It appears it was not, and you were only wanting to specifically discuss the humanitarian disaster point.
Indeed, I think it could be prevented in the aftermath of all slaves being emancipated at once but I do not think it is much to wonder about as that concern has nothing to do with why slavery continues.
I do not think we are in disagreement about that.
Diana, your talking out of both sides of your mouth. On one hand you defend the slavery that you wrongly assume is upheld as criminal punishment, then when challenged on that, you say that only the empire can answer, not you as you arent amarrian. Which is it, can you defend them or not?
I mean, aren’t we technically already dead? If some are to be believed, we die when we become capsuleers. So I’ve done that already.
For sure I am not defending slavery, it’s an archaic and outdated, inefficient and dangerous method of debt, prisoner and labour management, which I wouldn’t recommend anyone to use.
I do defend, however, Amarrian way as they choose to walk it. And I defend it only because they’re being bullied and attacked because of it.
Your soul is not yet dead.
You only defend it because they are being attacked? Does that make the federation worthy of a defense from you? You do attack them
OH FOR MAKER’S SAKE…
How I am freaking TIRED of stupidity.
Do I really have to explain it AGAIN?
We are fighting against the Federation because they attack us, occupy our planets, invade our regions to capture them.
And minmatar fight the empire because they attack us, invade our territory to enslave us. I dont see the difference, yet you are defending the empire
Well, there is a difference, the federation are not actively trying to enslave the caldari
Hello, hellloooo, hello!
What happened in YC110? Were it Amarr fleet that attacked CONCORD and invaded Minmatar Republic, descending on core worlds, kidnapping people?! No, it were minmatar.
Were it Caldari who penetrated gallente space under pretense of peaceful mission to ram their stations with one of the largest military craft? No, it were gallente.
Were it Caldari who were like - oh, Gallente colonized new region? Lets conquer it? No, it were gallente again!
Both the State and Empire are on defending positions, it happened just a little bit over a decade ago, how someone couldn’t know THAT?!..
Well, maybe becase WE AREN’T CRIMINALS?
On the other hand, they’re doing worse.
You’ve already been told that the slaves that they take are not criminals
Also, the Empire does regular raids in the republic to this day. Taking civilians. When the Republic invaded the Empire it was to take back their own people
Since the minmatars have started the war against the Empire it’s totally legal to do raids into hostile territory.
So basically you are saying that once the Federation manages to conquer you, you will stop fighting back?
Can you imagine dead people fighting back?