Now that could be a good addition of danger to asteroid belts. Miners will then have to keep moving to adjust for the spawning and moving damaging gas clouds that escape from the asteroids.
I like it!
Now that could be a good addition of danger to asteroid belts. Miners will then have to keep moving to adjust for the spawning and moving damaging gas clouds that escape from the asteroids.
I like it!
Good idea.
Which should themselves be mineable.
I doubt theyâll even consider this, as they Want new players to come and stay. Adding a bunch of â â â â that would deter new players or make the learning curve worse would be the exact opposite of ccp goals.
Since the first game to feature them, asteroids are much more usually associated with a hazard as well as a mining opportunity in the vast number of games. I doubt new players would think it strange.
Key word: WOULD.
How do you know it would deter or attract new players?
You donât. I donât and CCP can only guess, implement it and see how it goes.
Very few are horrific instant death, other than arcade style games.
I mean, Iâm not opposed to increasing standard rat strength in highsec, it hasnât been adjusted since⌠ever, and a civilian weapon is good enough for belt rats in highsec, a single warrior 1 on aggressive keeps an afk venture alive even. Which is a bit of a sign they are overly weak. Or some minor danger from asteroids.
But I donât see it making a meaningful difference to survival because they can just fit some tank and power through.
Thatâs pretty easy to anticipate really when it comes to this sort of thing. If it kills them in an un-fun arbitrary manner, then it will deter new players.
If it gives clear signs of what is going on, plenty of time to respond, and progressive danger, as well as interesting engaging actions to solve the problem, then itâs likely to keep them.
CCPâs goal is for you to get wealthy buying PLEX from them. They donât even try to hide the fact that this ore change was to line their pockets with PLEX revenue. CCP does not give a crap about you, the new players or the old players. CCP wants you to get ganked, so you will crack open your wallet and buy PLEX to fund that ship you just lost. CCP wants you to buy SKILL injectors so you can get over that learning curve. CCP took a lot of heat for the Resource Redistribution update and CCP responded by telling people to quit. So donât fool yourself, CCP donât give a â â â â about you or your game play.
Removed a few recent posts that violated the rulesâŚ
1.Specifically restricted conduct.
The purpose of the EVE Online forums is to provide a platform for exchange of ideas, and a venue for the discussion of EVE Online. Occasionally there will be conflicts that arise when people voice opinions. Forum users are expected to courteous when disagreeing with others.
In order to maintain an environment where everyone is welcome and discussion flows freely, certain types of conduct are prohibited on the EVE Online forums. These are:
Trolling Flaming Ranting Personal Attacks Harassment Doxxing Racism & Discrimination Hate Speech Sexism Spamming Bumping Off-Topic Posting Pyramid Quoting Rumor Mongering New Player Bashing Impersonation Advertising
You seem to overlook that they need new players so the game will continue as folks die or move on.
Theyâve made multiple quality of life changes, and continue to work on more. New player retention is a big goal.
Baby steps from ccp , if only they could commit on making eve better.Nul space still making trillions afk and safe income.New things that should come are sov bills should definitely go up can t have 3 alliances hold all null sec sov. Hs ore spawns should be nerfed or the null sec ore nerfs are just useless. More nerfs on ess wtf most sytsems got bounty modifiers above 100% are u joking?Nerf ice ore too, we are sick on the endless cidadel spwams(no fuel no cidadels).The cloacky changes they announced is pretty bad for the game ,just remove plex and make it something like buy isk throw ccp .Filaments need a rework sap.Filaments where designed as a content creator .most spawns are in dead systems .Filaments should be making roamers spawns directly on ratters .And ess wtf most ess got less than 20 mil inside .If you rat in 00 there should be some risk too put all income to the ess.The only thing that is working in eve at the moment is only wh.CCP maybe its time to bring back the black out people now are rdy to accept it.
Theyâve made multiple quality of life changes my ass. I donât know anyone that likes these changes besides the criminal gankers.
Exactly what âtheseâ changes are you talking about in-between your ranting.
Did you forget that you are in the Resource Redistribution update post?
Not at all, but you tend to rant all over the place, so I thought it might actually be useful to know which particular changes you are saying that no-one but gankers likes.
P.S. Criminal isnât really the right term, not in the forums, the character gets an in game criminal flag, that does not make the player a criminal.
Doesnât it though?
âdesigned to encourage tradingâ
yes
But the actual effect has been dubious.
I never had one complaint about the game until the Resource Redistribution update. I would not be here bitching if not for the Resource Redistribution update. If CCP would give some clear answers, I might of left when this all started but CCP is stringing folks along with lies so that everyone wont ask for their money back all at once. CCP lied and said that the Resource Redistribution update was temporary. CCP lied when they said that, once the destruction line crossed the the building line on their little chart, that they would revert the changes. Those lines crossed almost a month ago and still CCP has not reverted these stupid â â â â â â â changes. its fraud to keep telling a customer lies for financial gains. CCP should be facing class action laws suits for their malicious lies and deception. In the United States there are rules for those making false advertisement and claims.
Yeah the rest of the world doesnât follow silly USA lawsuit practices.
Also nice evading of the question with yet another rant.
Lawsuits⌠Here we go againâŚ