Equivocations and moving the goal posts around don’t win you any arguments, try again.
Until you actually explain, and therefore demonstrate its an equivocation/moving the goal post, its an empty, baseless accusation.
Get better at arguments or continue looking stupid.
The choice is yours.
1 Like
Insults is all ya got left, figured. I rest my case.
Red herring doesnt win you any arguments. Try again.
See? What a useless thing to say. No wonder you keep losing arguments.
I don’t need to win any arguments. You do. Let me know when ya figure it out.
If you want the game changed you do. CCP don’t just listen and act on “I don’t like that” and “you suck because you play that way” type reasoning, as the basis for changing the game.
Find me where I said those words, you can’t, cause I never did. Stop allowing others to think for you.
No one said you wrote those words, just that your posts are written with “that type of reasoning”; and that type of reasoning is useless.
I think fine on my own, but thanks for the advice. You might try it yourself some time.
So why do you keep responding? If it is a useless and vain attempt, at what, nothing? Frustrating isn’t it, to argue/fight against something you can’t seem to pin down or dissuade.
Perhaps it will encourage you to have some empathy for those who get ganked by multi-boxing chest thumpers. But probably not.
So you really think 11 PAYING pals are rage quitting because of one ganking account? Every player who’s seriously playing EVE longer than 1 month knows what’s up. So it’s generally Newbros who can’t stand a harsh environment. I wonder what they’ve expected, a cozy space industry and economy simulation?
And even better, you think these 11 will prevent others from playing EVE and paying. I just try to imagine what they gonna tell: “This game sucks, they just slaughter new players for a laugh!” or “The veteran players kill all the new ones to maintain their powerful positions.” To be honest, if you argue the way you do over here, I bet about 5 of them are tempted to try after your warning…
As mentioned here, all Veterans have been Newbros, too, and virtually all of us have been ganked. We’re still here (or here again), many are paying or PLEXing, which means there is a high demand for real money PLEX.
So EVE is a very interesting system: As soon as you change one parameter, you receive surprising results in different areas. All we know and witnessed several times: There’s no such thing as an everybody’s-happy-solution. High sec is not “total sec”. To handle the difference is your task, Player, it’s not too easy, but also not impossible. Get out and be bold!
1 Like
Not really in this case. I’m fine with the game as is.
Some might see empathy in trying to help with advice on your arguing technique. But since that hasn’t seemed to work, then still no sweat off my back, because the game is fine as is. Such is life.
That’s not what I wrote, that’s you reading it wrong. So I’ll not waste any time on the rest of your post.
Sorry, that table don’t turn.
As to the rest …
When I say it is “lazy”, the meaning is, it is simpler to multi-box and gank SOLO than team up with 10 other players and coordinate the effort. Instead the multi-boxing chest thumpers choose, due to thier bias, interpret “lazy” has how many buttons one must click to multi-box gank. Then they blather on about how Eve is not a solo game, while they sit there and play it solo with multi-box.
I don’t bother to explain this to them, so they run around crazy thinking they’ve made a point, when instead they miss it. I encourage them to run around and be silly, and they seem to enjoy it.
1 Like
I guess you never figured out that the status quo is multiboxing gankers. I don’t have to win any arguments, because what I’m arguing for already exists.
Let me know when ya figure out that the person trying to change the game is the one that has to win the argument.
What a silly man you are.
Show me where I made a suggestion to change the game to deal with soloing multi-boxer gankers.
Best of luck.
Are you seriously going to insult both of our intelligence by sitting there and telling me that you are claiming that this is out of balance but are not advocating to fix something that is out of balance?
Who is more foolish? The fool? Or the fool that interacts with him?
1 Like
Show me where I suggested changing the game, you can’t. So don’t insult my intelligence or the intelligence of any who else who wishes to waste their time reading our back and forth by implying I did something I did not do.
Clearly you have no remorse for straw-man arguments, constant equivocations and now outright lies. Do you feel any empathy or remorse for that? Do you feel any empathy or remorse for the victims of the multi-boxing solo player?
Do ya?
So you think its out of balance but you dont think it should be fixed or balanced? How much more dishonest can you be?
Stop making so many Ad hominem arguments.
I have no remorse for dishonest arguers like you.
There are more ways to balance ‘it’ than changing the code ya know. I’m sure how escapes you. The fact you want to avoid answering the question, of if you have any remorse or empathy, explains why it escapes you.
I will conclude then that you are not brave enough to say if you have any remorse or not, how’d that be?