Somebody who would laugh at and applaud an act of violence being perpetrated on another player for something that happened in the context of a game is not somebody I consider suitable for CSM candidacy.
Iâm sorry but I feel like your poll may be redundant. Since my previous super official and representative poll currently shows 80% of the player base supports salvos being banned entirely from the forums (and 20% support me drinking more⌠Why do you hate my liver)
Iâm willing to admit that what we do can be seen as an attempt to destroy his campaign. Only most people commonly use the term adversity to describe the situation. Most of the people who Iâve seen reply do seem to have only good intentions in mind and to get him to reconsider. Itâs obviously destructive what he is trying to achieve.
Iâm sure if people wouldnât respond as civil as they do, but if they were to use a much harsher language that he would have understood the message. Only this is not this kind of forum.
Itâs then that he will see our civil behaviour as weak and thus in support of his campaign that he continues with it.
I believe he is as innocent as he is oblivious to the fact that he is trolling. I donât know if there is anything one could say to get him to reconsider. I havenât seen him stray of his set course once. He always sets himself up for failure and holds on to it to the end. He is a âdie hardâ ignorant and unstoppable at it.
The point I was trying to make is that you never tell a potential voter that you donât want their vote. You want everybodyâs vote. If they donât agree with you, you tell them you look forward to changing their mind.
For example, Ill never detach the Goon vote from the list they are provided to vote for.
Nor will I ever get the votes of my trolls/antagonists here, no matter what I might say.