So Would like to see if there is any consensus on ships the community would rather have look different or feel need a spruce up.
Simply just post 2/3 ships hulls you would rather see different or improved.
I shall start.
Firstā¦ hehe
Iām fairly happy with the ships Iāve flown so far and those Iām looking to fly as well, although Iāll add that mid-slots are sorely lacking on most of the ones Iāve used so far.
I often see people complaining about some of the asymmetric ship models such as the Atron and the Imicus hull. I like them, they look clear, simple, iconic and go against the āthings must be symmetric to be prettyā idea that some people seem to have.
Thereās lots of (boring) symmetric ships, pick one of those.
I agree. I fly the hull a lot and itās just a green (cloaked) blob if I try to recall the design.
Proteus.
Itās still usable, but lacklustre in comparison with other T3s.
I donāt know how to fix it, but would welcome the suggestions of other players, especially those who still use it regularly.
is your comment in regards to itās looks or its use in game?
this topic is about visuals.
With links to concepts:
Hi Geo; of course, I misread the title - 
But a lessā¦ādogs-dinnerā re-work of the visuals would also be useful!
Sorry OP i really like the ships you mentioned the atron model looks really sleek i think . The Arazu etc iconic of the space potatoe practicality of some of gallante ship design .
Also sorry Gerard i cant stand the imicus doesnt fit with the gallente asthetic of stylish design imo looks like someone has had to prop something up and seems awkward and ill conceived especially for a Gallante ship .
Other than that id really say none , all the empires have there particular flavour and its represented across there ship stock . Think CCP have done very well in that regard and if it aint broke dont fix it ( except the imicus looks like it might topple over if you banked it too hard 
)
Bellicose, Vigil, Burst
The old Moa model made the Atron look like a beautiful supermodel. 
While Iām personally fine with the Atron line of shipsā shape, the Moa redesign I guess sets a precedent.
Itās not the ship itself, but the Megathron Navy issue needs to have a better standard paint job instead of the default āSpace Jungleā camouflage.
ā¦or perhaps CCP needs to add space jungles into EVEās environment.
Remove the damage type bonus limitation on missile ships. I donāt recall drone ships bonus being limited to some damage typeā¦
Each weapon type has itās own strengths and weaknesses. Yes, drones arenāt locked to damage type but lasers, hybrids and projectile weapons are. Drones can be shot, missiles have selectable damage types yet some hulls have bonuses for specific types of damageā¦ they arenāt meant to be the same. Therefore saying ābut that other weapon type has X so this weapon type should tooā is not a good argument.
That said, this thread seems to be about ship models, which is something completely different.
Caldari for example, also uses hybrid turrets, like Gallente. Gallente and Amarr are not limited on their drone boats, Caldari and Minmatar are limited on many missiles ships. Minmatar turrets are not limited to one damage type. Caldari are more limited overall.
Other topic for another thread?
My bad understanding of the word ārevampā. Didnāt know it was limited to their look.
Imicus.
For 100th time I have to write it.
Maybe CCP could revamp the battleship navy skin itās looking a tad dated especially on the fleet issue typhoon.
Magnate is just a weird looking Slave I from Star Wars though, not so creative.
edit: bantam is just a weird looking merlin
and Imicus is just the definition of ugly
I was told about a year or so ago on a Twitch stream, by a CCP artist, that they were looking at redesigning the Charon and Rhea. Thatās the last I heard of that though.