The Big Bang is the trigger, according to theory. There is still debate on much of the topics in your thread.
I think these links will interest you.
The Big Bang is the trigger, according to theory. There is still debate on much of the topics in your thread.
I think these links will interest you.
Yes, I have heard of the Habitable Zone. The next question is, would the Milky Way Galaxy have a Habitable Zone or just solar systems?
If only solar systems have a Habitable Zone, would each solar system be similar to a cell full of life travelling the galaxy until two solar systems with life pass close by to each other causing life in each solar to mix and create new life?
Is this thread about a scifi novel in the making or about dating twins ?
If you want both then Time Enough For Love by Heinlein is probably what youāre looking for (although the ādatingā is a little more extreme)
The galaxiesā only habitable zones exist around suns. Life needs the right amount of sunlight and water minus solar radiations.
I prefer to think of solar systems like atomic structures, some orbiting faster or slower around the galactic center depending on the distance they are from it.
Since everything solid, liquid, gas or a plasma has atoms then your model would be correct. But at what point did two atoms interact or come close together to exchange atomic information that sparked the first spark of life? Discovering the first time two atoms interacted to spark life could create a blueprint for other solar systems in being able to determine if the same atomic interactions that sparked life in the Sol system are present in the solar system being studied.
As soon as someone explains to me how 0+0=1 then I may attempt to answer that question.
No need to reinvent the wheel. Astronomers already have tools that give then enough info to make educated guess as to where the need to search in the cosmos to find earth-like conditions or close enough.
How does 0 0 equal 1?
Any number divided by 0 is 0. Q. 0 Ć· 0 is 1, as any number divided by itself is 1.
Thatās what Iād like to know.
But now they say that something may have been before the Big Bang so maybe they gave up trying to solve that calculation.
Stay tuned.
I think a lot of the problems that physicists encounter is that they do not know what took place before the Big Bang. Once physicists are able to understand how space-time functioned before the Big Bang, more of Einsteinās physics will be revealed as will new physics.
Not discounting faith, the deities of someoneās faith will always be present as a source of infinity and well out of the reach of science, but in retrospect, science can always bring humanity closer to a new planet or solar system to settle in that only confirms the persons faith in seeding the galaxy with life from Earth and discovering new life on new planets.
I wish them luck in solving the secrets of the universe. Good luck trying to figure out what was before a phenomenon never recorded, never witnessed and that might even have never happened or not happened as they expect.
I guess letās see if humans can go to Mars first. Havenāt been back to the Moon for 60 years and itās still as complicated as it was in 1969.
Reaching another solar system is still very much science-fiction.
Not really luck, but applying different physical anomalies in Einsteins Universe to space-time prior to the Big Bang, might yield interesting results that are exotic but could only happen prior to the Big Bang.
For example, if we take the same end results of what happens to atoms and photons that are pulled into a blackhole and apply those results to lets say, quarks or Higgs-Bosons, more specifically, is a quark or Higgs-Boson able to redshift, what happens to the particle at such a level?
@DrysonBennington Iāll have to finish our discussion here. Iām being harassed on this forum by arseholes and the ISD arenāt doing anything about it so I will just some posts here from now on and have discussions on Discord and Twitter.
Been great discussing with you.
o7
Some scientists believe the womb is a parasite that clung onto humans millions of years ago, this theory is interesting since the human body does rely on millions of microbial life to function.
I found a study about this, enjoy: Ancient genomic parasites spurred evolution of pregnancy in mammals - UChicago Medicine
Unfortunately for your elegantly exemplified post, that atom model is very āwrongā. Even in its day it was considered a problem. Itās the old Rutherford model, based on his famous alpha particle experiment on a gold foil target, which showed that the positively charged mass was in a single, central location, and hence the electrons had to be āsomewhere elseā in some kind of trajectory, to keep the atom electrically neutral - which it is of course. Itās indeed a planetary depiction of an atom, and thatās as far as they could probe the structure of the atom back in 1911.
The very basic issue with the model is that positive and negative attract. Electrons would spiral down to the nucleus, thereby losing energy (they go from high to lower potential energy) - which would be seen as EM radiation. Since that clearly does not happen, the model is simply āwrongā, or at the very least very āincompleteā.
It took more than a few Nobel prize winners and a famous (dead-and-alive) cat to make a scientifically satisfying i.e, predictive model, based on experimental evidence. Unfortunately, the model is so difficult to put into a reasonable depiction that one canāt even find a decent gif for anything but a single orbital. That is also the reason why the Rutherford model is to this day the most popular depiction of āthe atomā.
But all that aside ā¦
I indeed highlighted āexperimental evidenceā. Itās clear to everyone that one canāt run controlled experiments (and hence fulfill the requirement of verification) when it comes to astronomy, at least not when it comes to big bangs and origin of life questions. And that presents an insurmountable problem at this moment, but can lead to appealing stories and hypotheses.
I just finished the netflix series Iām guessing the OP is named after.
Is this about the Fermi paradox? ā¦So where is everyone?
They are hiding from Humanity because they are scaredā¦
Indeed, but those are still only single orbitals for an isolated hydrogen atom (not even a hydrogen molecule as we encounter them), not a depiction of āwhat atoms really look likeā. Imagine what would happen when the maker of that video would superimpose those orbitals, meaning he has a multielectron atom (i.e. anything but hydrogen), and you see how quickly it becomes a mess, or rather a dull blob with a Van der Waals radius, lol.
I see what youāre trying to do.
All I say here is:
See you on Discord if you want to discuss more.
Iām EfBee on the EvE Discord. Throw me a friend request if you feel like it.