What makes you think that those who login each day wouldn’t enjoy it? It’s just completely baseless nonsense what you give off.
Talking a lot of nonsense and enjoying doing so is still enjoyment.
I think CCP showed these numbers not without reason. I think they think, that people think its actually not how it should be. Like you wrote, there may be little wrong with it, and they want to get rid of that wrong, no matter how little it is. 
That’s implying he would have had actually good intentions at heart, which is nonsense. Any excuse would just be a lie. That’s literally how politicians operate. They’re acting malicious, then they issue an apology and dumb people just buy it without realising that it means absolutely nothing.
I don’t really understand that question. I am only being represented myself. There is no CSM who represents me, I speak up for myself. I might hand him over my thoughts and ideas (as I did) to relay them forward for me, but that does not mean he is representing me. It means he’s allowed to relay things I have given him. And I do not actually have any faith that that happened. I’ve tried, though, and I have no issues stepping over people if I feel a pressing need to get something heard, or read.
Anyone who speaks for me can only do so with my explicit consent, otherwise I would make very clear that he (whoever, really) is full of ■■■■. Being a paperboy doesn’t make you the representative of the whole news company.
1 Like
How much are you spamming them to CSM?
Are you spamming them to CCP staff too?
You mean like CCP wouldn’t know what they meant and first needs to ask the CSM about it?
What I said was that the data was so stark it would justify turning them off immediately and promising a fix after the fact.
That being said, I think that’s only a worst case scenario, and I hope that CCP commits to fixing them as top priority rather than just tearing them out. I think we can come up with a system that protects these smaller groups without completely destroying the non-griefing aspects of this system (e.g., high sec structure spam, red vs. blue).
I’m fine with them just tearing out the bounty system, though.
3 Likes
Player, or NPC bounty?
You should spend some time with me in local chat.
Or look at the wardec discord.
Or look at the CSM channel.
Though it’s been a long while already, so you’d have to use the search.
The wardec discord is the best place to see just how much I can talk, continuously, coherently, with good ideas, all day, every day, forever. Most often it is just “rubber ducking” if you’re familiar with that term, but that does not change the fact that I have spent a significant amount of time spreading my thoughts and ideas throughout people.
Though just like in local … when it’s useless, I stop … but I’m not one who gives up easily. The current situation does not demand to bring forward anything at all, btw. You’re overreacting about something that appears to be mostly irrational, simply because that horror scenario of yours would already exist if anyone truly cared.
I see no issues in un-wardeccable-corps, as long as that type of corp is properly gimped. Anything else would be game breaking. I actually believe that there should be several types of corps, not just two. The more types, the better it would be, because different types of corporations could represent different levels of responsibility and dangers, allowing for a more - and better - structured society.
CSM may be treated as a litmus test of sorts. CCP can ask them. Of course something is going on. Is that a smoke screen or some legit concern? I dont know. But PA is now pulling the strings by hanging that bonus in front of them like a carrot.
Lets say CCP did not actually lose interest in taking bonus from PA. That they want at least to provide positive statistics for a year or two. Who is to stop them?
That you spam stuff there doesnt say much except that you are trying to influence them directly in your own interests.
They are probably tired and bored of you already.
And nothing in your head stopped you from uttering this nonsense, did it?
Nope. The data was that bad.
2 Likes
Player.
2 Likes
No, your head is bad.
War is not meant to support and encourage enemy activity. It is meant to suppress it. It is working as intended.
You think this was bad, but it’s you who is bad.
Its a low priority. Effects nothing as it is. Its a harmless, and ineffectual, vestige.
You’re in absolutely no position for me to care about what you think, and if you refuse to do your own homework then so be it. You being paranoid is no issue of mine whatsoever and your voice, at least with this kind of reasoning, will mostly stay unheard and ignored.
Step away from the computer, go outside, take a walk, take a few deep breathes and you just might get to realise how utterly irrational AND EMOTIONAL you are being.
Bye.
Yet you think I, and we, and CCP, and CSM, whom you spam, should care what you think.
What “position” do you think you are in?
I’m smart. I have proven that times and times again.
You’re clearly not. You’ve proven that, at least in this thread.
Have a nice day and don’t let me ignoring your drivel stop you from having the last word so you can feel better again.
Calm down. 
If by “suppressing enemy activity” you mean “forcing players to quit the game” then you’re nuts.
2 Likes