The taxes would have hurt, they’re backdated to 1776
The “document” is easily found via google.
I shall not identify the player in question; although if I did, I’m fairly sure that it’d come as no surprise as to their identity.
The taxes would have hurt, they’re backdated to 1776
The “document” is easily found via google.
I shall not identify the player in question; although if I did, I’m fairly sure that it’d come as no surprise as to their identity.
Maybe Concord can take a break for a day
Historically autopilot went awol so why not concord too
I’m still right in what i say…
About EVERYTHING i state…
Nah.
You don’t understand what a lack of nonconsensual PvP in general will have on EVE. Your blind devotion to a principle (that it is categorically bad and shouldn’t exist anywhere, for any reason) is preventing you from evaluating something from all angles. You have been arguing against an entire gaming genre’s right to exist, and that’s unimaginably ignorant and close-minded.
this and there is a lot of games were his goals are a reality and yet he chose to fight the battle on eve online
Back on Topic:
Of the listed systems that might be converted to Triglavian systems, approximately half are high security ice belts. Another big portion of these systems are Level 4 or Epic Arc hubs.
No coincidence.
Nullsec ratting must be the only thing CCP Hellmar approves of.
The plot thickens?
Back on Topic:
Of the listed systems that might be converted to Triglavian systems, approximately half are high security ice belts. Another big portion of these systems are Level 4 or Epic Arc hubs.
No coincidence.
I’m saying from the start that the last ‘updates’ are nothing more than a vendetta against PVE…thank you CSM…for nothing…
Considering there is no official list, just a bunch of player guesses… Maybe stop with the salt?
There is kind of, with the systems being in danger of becoming lowsec shown in an official CCP lore video.
Well yes, but that was a list made by players and released as an IC news article. Not a Dev blog.
Correct, CCP may just trolling, or players’ conclusion was right, or they liked the list to become real … it’s now time for a dev blog.
if a system turns into low ill try to shoot dudes on it
Correct, CCP may just trolling
gasp CCP would never do that to players who are tinfoiling…
Yeah ok, so they totally might.
And that’s why I said to hold off on the salt for now.
If it turns out every lvl 4 mission hub & all the inter empire links get targetted, then sure, I’m not going to mind people being salty, I probably will as well, since as I’ve said above, it’s not an equal seesaw between highsec & lowsec, it’s not like FW at all.
mmm… Sparkyboi!
Yeah, but you won’t be alone.
I think he is ok with people shooting him.
Definitely with the amount of research being done, as showed in CCP stream about invasions, I think it would have a lot more sense is we will have influence on the status of system, and if it goes into low sec or not. Anything like invasion automatically giving system a low sec status seems like getting rid of oportunity to activate PvEers with something logical and reasonable.
What happens when the E rises up and says “No more!”?
Think about that, eh
Scolluzer…oh damn!