And what relationship does that have with my comment to a ganker that watching local in a busy system being pretty difficult and worthless in the main? Does stating the obvious on some wild tangent invalidate my question to the ganker?
Which means you have to start hunting. In other words be a hunter killer?
I have a lot of respect for people who do that, Kane is one for example.
We’ve already established that hunting someone who never plays is a nonstarter.
And that is your excuse.
It’s very simple. I pointed out it was easier in quiet systems. Which you then proceeded to say it was still impossible.
So i am curious whether you still believe that to be the case.
Is mining in quiet systems safer than mining in busy systems. In your opinion?
That is because I was talking about busy systems. And you were off on a wild Cathy Newman tangent of your own making…
I am curious to why you think that this is the case, because I was always talking about busy systems.
And that is the tangent question you went off in to reply to my comment to a ganker asking him if watching local in a busy system worked.
I will just keep repeating that to you.
Yes i get that. But its valid to propose that the solution to that is to find less busy places. In which case you could have said “less busy places don’t interest me”. That’s fine. If you or whoever else wants to deal with the increased risk for whatever benefits they see in doing that then more luck to them.
But you didn’t say that.
What you said in reply was that the quiet systems i was referring to didn’t exist. And even if they did using local and dscan in those systems would still mean it was impossible to avoid gankers. Go reread it all. It’s there on the archive.
Explained above. This isn’t difficult. If you like quiet pubs and the pub you are in is too busy……. You move to a quieter one. If you like the busy pub and want to stay thats fine. But dont tell me quiet pubs dont exist. 
Again see above.
So in the interests of clarity
Is mining in quiet systems safer than mining in busy systems?”
So let us get to the real meat on the bone of your posting here and in regards to this. There are two possibilities to this question you raised.
-
That you suddenly made this understanding that out of the way systems are safer and wanted to tell people how good you were by pushing this observation no matter what.
-
That this was a classic Saul Alinsky reframe the point as an absurdity so as to attack the person and their credibility and to obscure the real point made.
I have you as number 2. I used to moderate a forum or two and I was well aware of this second type. They always gave themselves away by at some point calling the other person stupid. And you have done that, I just banned them from the forum.
That is what you did. That these forums are appallingly managed is without question, but please do continue to argue the absurd point you have created.
You also tried again, which is to take a statement like me saying that such systems are few and far between and telling me that I said that they do not exist. I at that point was trying to talk to you based on you perhaps being genuine based on option 1. That you then went absurd again was very telling.
You think you are very good at this, but in truth you are utterly appalling…
But do continue.
Or perhaps as i stated in the original exchange i was reacting to you giving BAD advice to players. Effectively telling them they had no agency in whether or not they were ganked or not. Which is just untrue.
I just re-read the initial exchange. It’s in the Crime and Punishment Thread thats still open back in November 21st. I urge you to go back and review it and then come back and tell me i was attacking for the sake of it.
In the original exchange you specific say that the systems i was referring to were fake. I think you really underestimate how much of a moron you can be when you chose to die on a hill because your ego takes over.
Good at what? Typing? Posting on a forum? Asking direct questions? Not twisting and turning to avoid answering questions?
Dracvlad is blocked for over doing it and making false and stupid accusations of a RL nature. So I repeat Dracvlad is blocked, and I have nothing to be scared off, after all you are a person who doesn’t undock and who is too scared to put a war HQ up. And you sit in an 0.8 that I never use and I have no worries about losing ships. And of course can’t see that war dec notification either…
I know what you are doing, the issue is that the forum moderators here don’t.
My comment was about busy systems, the absurdity is making it about quiet systems. And trying to tell me that I said that they don’t exist when I said that they were few and far between. The driver also being that many were often more populated because they were dead-end systems.
You are calling yourself out mate and you know it.
It is up to the moderators to do their job on this type of thing. My option was to block you at that point, and I am tempted to do the same thing now because you are a number 2.
My comment was about busy systems, you turned it into an absurdity which you then argued about to try to paint me in a bad light. You are just rather bad at it.
What i am doing is calling out someone for being wrong.
If you feel that i am somehow breaking forum rules by all means report me. There are systems in place for that.
But the progression from offering your argument, to blah blah blah to accusations that i am breaking forum rules and the forum moderators are giving me a pass. Is very telling.
Read the exchange again. It is quite clear from a number of posts that the discussion was about both quiet and busy systems. It’s all there.
If i knew how to bring in quotes from another thread i would. But that level of forum skill still evades me
So I have decided to block you again, I hope you get better at this but I doubt it. Two week block applied. Remember that the ISD will only come after me, not you for off-topic posting.
LIke i said before. The blocks are all about when you back yourself into a corner with absurd non-factual arguments and your ego refuses to acknowledge the fact.
Don’t worry. Ill put a note in my diary so we can revisit this on the 22nd or the 23rd
Looking forward to it
You did this last time to. Portrayed yourself as a victim. Topics evolve. That’s the nature of the discussion. You say something. I raise something in response. You raise something in response. And so on. That inevitably leads to a bit of wandering.
I would however like to apologise to @Githany_Red . The nature of standing up to this fool inevitable means lots of posting in order to stop him constantly reframing issues and lying about things he has previously said. The intention was not to bomb your thread.
Temporary block permanently extended by another two weeks.
The reason for my block is stated. I think he is trolling in a very dishonest way. He also has nothing to add to anything discussed, having no experience or knowledge in these subjects. There is no value in me interacting with him until he gets better both in Eve and on the forums.
There’s little value in you interacting with anyone, to be quite honest. I don’t think your presence has enriched the life or playing experience of even a single individual over your entire time in the game. Hopefully I’m wrong, but two years is a pretty significant sample size.
I have applied a 76 minute permanent temp block to whoever reads this.
1 Like
Githany has already said otherwise, and I do have a following, I often get people waving at me in local. So you know, you don’t see what I see.