Why?
Do you run the rest of my post on an audio system which you would translate and ask me if I designed the electronic translator?
Maybe it’s not meant to be translated.
I get a lot of that.
There is a court case about this , on how people like you seek to forfeit my communication and the inventory of those communication starting in April 1993, after graduating in information systems with a course from Purdue University done from Canada for that.
Not only that, but, also, other confusion as to how the forfeiture is sought,
including the forfeiture of a bronze plaque which was placed in the cemetery of the church for the exact same moral reasons they seek and sought to forfeit the cohesion level, and seek to diminish the coherence level of those communication for, and of, and from the same source.
ad·dled
/ˈadld/
adjective
-
_ unable to think clearly; confused.
“this might just be my addled brain playing tricks” -
_ (of an egg) rotten.
Again, exactly what you try to imply and impart onto me, my work, moral, and, misrepresenting your morals while attacking me, and then, trying to misrepresent yourself like if you were not attacking me of the sort, by expressing me in your sense of what negativity is.
No matter how limited or confused you may be, and while omitting any of the related psychological related facts such as:
Ah, yes, as for doing your best to get me banned, that was already done before,
and no, you don’t have to mention about moderation on the forums,
and no, I don’t have to mention about moderation on the forums either by the way.
I would suggest you stay away from me,
instead of questioning and sanity and logic.
Also, please, don’t bother my family with it either, as you are.
I don’t want you to harass me either, and neither do I want to harass you,
and be wrongfully misrepresented as if my posts were not welcomed,
and annoying,
even if you are worse than annoying by misrepresenting the use and benefit of mask,
confusing,
and
inexplicable piles of word salad
and have negative value to this forum.
Additionally,
Since you are doing that to me and try to justify to do this to others,
I also have to report you to the proper authorities and medical authorities
outside of the scope of this forum,
also with Interpol,
and don’t be surprise if I go to Europe with it when others are restricted freedom of movement for it.
What about you?
Who tries to get you banned,
and why are they trying to get you banned,
if not to represent you as,
annoying, confusing, inexplicable piles of word salad,
and have negative value to this forum,
as well as forfeit previous works as such,
as well as attack the moral values with additional negative connotation,
like if you didn’t go where no one has gone before.
As if they would seek to justify doing onto you,
even if they don’t think it should be done onto them.
It’s not very hard to format text to make it easier to read for
people who are not executive and don’t care to organize what they read
in ways which is more meaningful and useful to them.
Instead of seeking to justify to attack.
–
Since
January 1, 1942, representatives of 26 nations at war with the Axis powers met in Washington to sign the Declaration of the United Nations endorsing the Atlantic Charter, pledging to use their full resources against the Axis and agreeing not to make a separate peace.
Isn’t that the same financial problem since 1929 about the current $1.2 short-selling case,
trying to blame companies for not trading when the market is not taking their orders because they are overloading the system which is paid for them to trade from the same parties they sought to bankrupt. ?
–
Maybe you’re associated with the people who stole the plaque and sought to forfeit the benefit of it to society by trying to make me seem like a common nuisance while diverting with more specific attacks which are no less misleading and intended to divert the same ways.
Either that, or, you seek to get other people to be mislead, unless of course, you only want to test them, in which case I would have to report you to them, but they already had the report before.
–
Also, why would I have to explain myself, or, be obligated,
if I shouldn’t obligate you, and
if obligating you that way would not be good to info and
conducive of positive thinking.?
–
1. - 23 minutes later at 20:03 Mon Feb 1, 2021:
Maybe it’s part of your language to attack the English language
as if it was not English or American,
or,
that you just want to start some propaganda against me to abuse me about my language,
and the communication I use by representing it negatively ,
without objective reasons as to why,
to get some more credit the ways you used to get and
seek to justify the assets gained from, in those ways .?
Maybe incite others to try to create the same integrity level of attacks against the cohesion of the words and the benefit to society of the words, to credit yourself to discredit me of,
as if I wouldn’t be able to analyze it, and would not pay to investigate it,
and I was not offered to apply for government work for security work related to the integrity of that work and the attacks incited towards it.?
After all, if some people can seek to justify it onto others,
surely, it won’t do anymore wrong to do it onto justifiable good valid points,
or, that can be made false excuse of for doctorate degrees,
which,
if no one respects those degrees, including the army,
would not work to be a general for that army either.
Those foundations of the organizations above are how the WHO started for this pandemic.
–
2. - At 20:33:
Additionally,
if you seek to justify to attack someone’s words and communication by making them seem to be ,
annoying,
that is, as annoying as you try to make them be , also annoying to others ,
not in regards to benefit they bring,
and while trying to create influence in regards to the exact same benefit they do bring to society, in the same negative way,
and be addled, and become addled,
and
confusing, inexplicable piles of word salad and have negative value to this forum,
onto others,
and, I’m not only witness of that, but also attacked from you or your associates,
or other associated with this philosophy or psychology to seek to justify to do this onto others, by misrepresenting how you do so,
and misrepresenting your behavior as if good for them,
and,
want me to be misrepresenting you as if good to them,
then, you have other problems outside of the scope of this forum.
Which is also related to the exact same information system methods,
and which is also related with how you try to justify your own justification system in relation to this info system, and how you seek to use it, and make it be as you want it to be,
as well as to try to interfere against the paid benefit from it.
In other words, theft, and, attempted theft, fraud, and also seeking to try to get away with it after the fact, and also trying to get others to associate to do so with you.
–
Also, if you gain from this type of fraud,
why should I seek credit from you, even and especially if you try to get me banned,
which would be an association with you,
a party seeking to get me banned?
Enslaving a bit, against international law?
–
3. - 2 hours later, 1 hour after the last update at 21:35 Mon Feb 1, 2021:
I already report to the UN.
I don’t suggest you try to do that to other people.
Maybe if you find someone else offensive, try to explain to them why and how it is that you find them offensive, and inform them of the damage they may have caused to others,
from their negativity, which they may not have otherwise been able to be aware of,
since no one else who should have informed them did inform them.
Don’t try to interfere against their freedom of expression and opinion just so that you can try to make yourself seem as if some savior of mankind of so on, with no actual real benefit to what you do, and trying to be discredit others just because you want to,
without even trying to prove and explain why you try to discredit the person you attack.
It’s like trying to coerce people in sex crimes or some other life long indictment,
which, they would not only be a party of,
but, if the authorities in charge refuse to accept report of the crimes,
are the principal of the crime, not even accesories.
–
Information has this thing which does not allow others to abuse it,
and, when intended to be coerced into damaging others,
and sought to be used to be made into a weapon against others,
to seek a change,
designed ways to bring change about which are not only more cost-efficient,
but, also, more beneficial for the same people who were deemed to be damaged by the same system, and info,
and, which the party intending to blame the one imparting them with info by communicating it to them, even though there are other ways to impart information and benefit from into ,
which 75% more than the 25% of communication it represents,
seeks to discredit the part who does bring them benefit,
so as to control the benefit they bring, and then, try to get away with it,
as if it was ok for them to try to hide that it was not ok for them to do so,
and try to make the ones who bring benefit to them seem as a traitor,
while they are in fact the ones who are traitors and seek to get others to be as they are.
–
It’s like offering someone to seek credit from fraudulent sources,
so that their works and rights can be forfeited by associating with them.
Instead of letting them inform others about how some party tried to get them to associate with them, so that they can seek to forfeit their rights,
as if it was good for them to do so.
Well, don’t get me wrong, but, transfer of intellectual property rights works,
for rightful employers who don’t discriminate in their manners of employment,
and don’t seek to justify previous discrimination in manners of employment,
and don’t try to coerce people in organized crimes because they don’t want those they indict as criminal to work for them,
and that, while in fact seeking to enslave the same criminals and justify the illness from their mental condition as the best potential limit for mental health,
and to try to misrepresent their work as if good to society,
when it is not only alienating others, but, also, as unhealthy as they are towards themselves,
and seeking to get the target they attack to seem to cause themselves problems,
by misrepresenting them as if they caused themselves problems,
and by seeking to actively cause them problems,
hoping that their diversion towards their own conscience and mental health ,
and misrepresentation towards others,
will be enough to allow them to attack them time and time again, over and over,
ad infinitum aeternam. -(Even ad finitum aeternam.)
I also seek to not only transfer the rights of my work to my fiancée and potential child, but, also to her when we get married,
and use the proof of attacks from you against me as an information for her to use to protect herself from your attacks against her cohesion and family well-being.
I also do happen to have an information system business and company and I’m offered an office with NATO cyber-security headquarter in Tallinn, Estonia, for that.
Which intelligence do you work for?
Is it like some kind of industrial intelligence?
Or are you just from military intelligence?
Yeah, one more thing, the army finds those criminal charges to be enmity towards their association with citizens in NATO territories, and so does the UN, and so does the WHO who care for those military personnel.
–
4. - At 21:59:
It’s like saying, he’s against us, but, he can’t tell us how to get better or why,
because if he did, it would help us to get better ,
and either bother them less, or, be more beneficial to them,
without showing how or how much,
because if he doesn’t,
then, he would endanger the way we are getting support when not proving it,
and hiding it, and trying to get benefit from unfairly hiding it.
Like if trying to create some kind of negative and dangerous secret,
instead of being honest about it, and having reasonable and concrete proof,
not biased and without objectivity, but with an actual good ideal and goal to reach to.














