Out of argumnents?
And? low and null are naturally more risky; any safety net is provided by players, not NPCs.
Out of arguments?
Nope. Your statement that âthere is nothing the PVEâer can do about it beside deleting his accountâ is a steaming great pile of excrement.
I am a PvE player, I donât get ganked, I donât get baited, and I donât get dead.
Simply put I am the proof that your statement is false.
2 Likes
And this is the reason there is no need to use a ârewardâ as an argumnet against a safe highâŚsimply not validâŚ
well there we have it, you want the reward without the risk, you want to interact in PVP but be immune to itâs effects.
you want to set up a situation where everyone can just protect their supply chain in a Balos Bubble 
give it a rest.
1 Like
I wrote this sentence and how I will laugh someday while I read it and drinking a glass of fine wine. 
So what?
EVERYBODY can buy on the market,even you and your enemiesâŚi REALLY donât see your pointâŚ
Even you can become a high trader and benefit from itâŚno one forces you to play the PVP gameâŚand yesâŚthe ones that roam in high SHOULD benefit why not?
As long as everybody can decide to be a high industrialist why not?
What you want is just keeping the current status because you fear the change and the stronger opposition in low/00 and this is in no way better than me benefitting from a safe highâŚso come off from your high horse.
Wat?â˘
Nullsec, naturally high risk from others, high rewards
Lowsec, naturally medium risk from others, medium rewards
Hisec, naturally low risk from others, low rewards.
In nullsec and lowsec the naturally higher risks are decreased by player actions.
In highsec the naturally low risk is increased by player actions.
This is a core part of the gameplay, and you disregard it as an invalid argument?
2 Likes
You are looking at it from a wrong perspective.
What Trust is hinting at, is a scenario where for example goons will put all their industrialists within highsec taking up all the resources and funneling them into their own war efforts. They will not put them on the market.
Under your system, there would be no way to influence this. So it will result in every huge corp setting risk-free industry in highsec and hauling it out to null.
This is why I said in one of my earlier posts that if you want safe highsec, you need to limit it SEVERELY either in amount of highsec available or in the amount of isk/resources that can be extracted from the systems.
While you personally might not exploit risk-free highsec, a n+1 alliance will for sure exploit the system to its extremes.
2 Likes
hey balos, itâs ok , your last reply answered everything i need to know about just how much you know and understand about the game.
let me remind you.
Yes and your point is?
High alreqady has its own rewards that are the lowest in all parts of eve so what is the problem here even if high would become PVP free?
You mean about YOUR game?
You are not the centre of the universe even if your granny tells you that you are every morningâŚ
Risk is inherently tied in with reward, it is a core tenet of the game.
If hisec is freed from PvP, it becomes a risk free area. No risk should mean no reward, you canât have one without the other.
You donât get to have your cake and eat it, sorry.
i just can repeat this permanently but there still would be someone coming out with the same old argumentâŚso to make it CLEARâŚ
YES there will be significant parts of the game(players) that have to actually GIVE UP something for the equality but this is to accept for the greater goodâŚyou are free to leave if you cannot handle itâŚ
And exploits?
Come on exploits are here since 2003 so what would change?
Nothing
How will I laugh in just one year âŚ
Hint: core âtentâ of the game is TO MAKE MONEY 
i clearly said the game, letâs have a look.
yup i said the game, not my game.
thatâs a very childish thing to say, how old are you?
You already have equality, everybody is free to try to play the game in a way that pleases them, which includes trying to interfere with the gameplay of others.
1 Like
YesâŚ6-10 year olds with daddys credit cardsâŚ
I already mentioned it in another postâŚ
Really?
Equality is one part beeing able to force its playstyle upon all others?
Maybe you should reconsider your memeâŚ
Nope, thatâs the core tenet of the business. The game is a product used to do so.
Itâs not going to make money if itâs â â â â . Your game would be â â â â . Short life, quick wins. Dead, in short order.
EVE has never been a fad, itâs been hardcore for long term players. Long term players make up much of the current base. It doesnât take a rocket scientist to work out what would happen if you theme parked it because, letâs face it do you really see the changes stopping with hisec? No, of course not.
Please donât profess to be business savvy when youâre actually clueless. Itâs embarrassing.
1 Like