One of the few honestly doing good for eve, I’m sure he’s trying to filter out the corporate, political ■■■■■■■■ to get changes that the game needs, as apposed to the current rhetoric that seems to be focusing on monetising everything, including pay to win boosters. No players no game.
Pando is level headed and open to discussion on things he may not necessarily agree with, but is willing to find the reasoning behind those discussions, and provide alternatives. He’s a breath of fresh air among null CSM’s who seems to have the big in picture in mind about EVE online.
We need as many level headed and open to discussion CSM’s as possible so that we can find resolutions and compromises as needed to EVE’s complex problems. He definitely should be on for another term (or two).
Thoroughly endorse, pando was a great FC when my Pentag Bros joined Initiative under the Escalated corp. His depth and breadth of knowledge and good community engagement will continue to be an asset to the CSM
Insane idea - pay with PLEX in NES for extra dev time
i get the idea but there is a host of problems coming with it and the chances are slim to non ccp would even consider it, so i won’t spend time and effort on that
Quafe+ is from “biomass” (…or corpse reprocessing)
it could work but not sure about the need
Little things / Small QoL suggestions - Better Visibility Of Other Players’ PI Networks
not sure about importance really
Little things / Small QoL suggestions - 13 requests for Stack Split enhancment since Jun’18
i have brought forward the suggestion to introduce a multi-stack-split feature already (who knows if we get it)
Little things / Small QoL suggestions - PI KB-shortcuts for toggling between groups of structures